• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

How long do you think that it will take before zoosexaulity starts to become as accepted as other sexualities?

title says it

  • 5 years

    Votes: 45 5.6%

  • 2 years

    Votes: 21 2.6%

  • 10+ years

    Votes: 619 77.1%

  • 7 years

    Votes: 20 2.5%

  • Never

    Votes: 98 12.2%
  • Total voters
    803
DVDA said:
You and I are creepy old outddated zoos from heyday BF, we can get away with saying whatever we want
Click to expand...
I predate BF - by a pretty good margin. First downloaded a zoo/beasty pic by sending a FIDONet echomail message from the local dial-up BBS to an address that claimed to be a "gateway" to this newfangled thingamajig they were starting to call the internet. That would have been back around 1989-1990 or so. "The Web" and Google didn't exist yet. Hell, mosaic hadn't been codified, let alone written that far back, and if you said JavaScript, people woulda looked at you funny! Before the first spam - the Green Card lottery - on USENET.
 
UR20Z said:
vic21 said:
Well, its pretty obvious. We wont have to live in fear of criminal charges for our sexuality, and we wouldn't have to worry about those criminal charges when we take the chance to come out to a spouse or family members. If that's not good enough for you, I don't know what is.
Click to expand...
I don't live in fear of/worry about, etc, etc, etc. My sex life is nobody's business, and I behave accordingly. I have no need to tell anybody I fuck horses. It's not a "badge of honor" I feel any need to display. It's not an "I'm speshul" prize the way it seems so many of the droolers who come through here think.

On the flip side, if I were to "come out" as a zoo, I'd be unemployed, and probably in prison in one helluva hurry, the critters that are mine would likely be killed (or at least sexually mutilated) and basically, my life would end, even if I was still walking around breathing.

You describe a benefit that is of no benefit.

Try again?
Click to expand...
So in responding to the hypothetical scenario of decriminalization you assert you would be in prison.... If anyone needs any evidence that you're not listening this is it.
 
FloofyNewfie said:
Well, if the similar poll from THIS thread is anything to go by, had "Never" been an option, it would have likely won by a landslide.

Science may be on our side (assuming that the animal is given a choice in the matter), but one thing that we can never fight against is the abundance of human ignorance. Hell, not even US zoos can agree what's "proper" and what's not when it comes to bestiality. Just look at the recent "Men fucking female dogs is rape." thread that's currently still on the front page of the DF.
Click to expand...
and normies don't agree on what is proper in human sexual relations. Do not forget the issue, there doesn't need to be consensus on some zoo bible to make the case. What we (should) want, what we deserve, is decriminalization. Government needs to stop kidnapping, stealing, killing us because of deeply flawed and contradictory moral logic.

That's all. Once that happens the only inevitable outcome is slow increase in tolerance and better ways to identify true abuse.
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
Ok that was hilarious, but I'm going to out myself here a bit but there are some good stories on these sites. I sometimes fear that they need to be rescued off there. I had a bad experience with herpy.net disappearing without warning.
Click to expand...
I secretly managed a novel for a friend, grammar and spelling, formatting, posting it to all relevant accounts and contributed corrections to another really really long one that I was on a special mailing list to get, but you didn't hear that from me Imagine reading in the year 2022 AD.

I had some drawings on herpy, someone put them there. That's from before I had to go into the internet witness protection program.

Herpy was full of loads of niche good art. I was sad to see it go. I need to look, I may have a siterip somewhere (unless I'm confusing it with some other siterip where my art ended up in).
 
MachineFox said:
I had some drawings on herpy, someone put them there. That's from before I had to go into the internet witness protection program.

Herpy was full of loads of niche good art. I was sad to see it go. I need to look, I may have a siterip somewhere (unless I'm confusing it with some other siterip where my art ended up in).
Click to expand...
I have a considerable amount of the "good" stuff, but yea that's when I was really thinking there had to be a better solution. One of these days I'm going to get some spare time and find, make, or at least proselytize a decentralized solution.
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
I have a considerable amount of the "good" stuff, but yea that's when I was really thinking there had to be a better solution. One of these days I'm going to get some spare time and find, make, or at least proselytize a decentralized solution.
Click to expand...
I'd say most art on Herpy was way above the quality of your average FA submission, but it was never too great. Part of the charm, I guess.

I understand the reasons and advantages of decentralization, but you gotta have enough people interested in it to be useful, otherwise it's gonna be downtime central. For small niche stuff maybe traditional web hosting is the solution.
 
MachineFox said:
I understand the reasons and advantages of decentralization, but you gotta have enough people interested in it to be useful, otherwise it's gonna be downtime central. For small niche stuff maybe traditional web hosting is the solution.
Click to expand...
Well you're assuming that the only form of decentralization is shared computing. There are some systems (again I haven't researched enough, I don't know if it's dead or not what I remember) like: https://skynetlabs.com/. You don't need only people interested in X to host a website about X, a few interested people can pay; and it shouldn't cost very much. Not different from a site like this, it's not inherently easier for a single person to host this website with all its content, but there are enough people willing to pay.
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
Well you're assuming that the only form of decentralization is shared computing. There are some systems (again I haven't researched enough, I don't know if it's dead or not what I remember) like: https://skynetlabs.com/. You don't need only people interested in X to host a website about X, a few interested people can pay; and it shouldn't cost very much. Not different from a site like this, it's not inherently easier for a single person to host this website with all its content, but there are enough people willing to pay.
Click to expand...
Yeah that's a good idea actually.

Imho scale bandwidth and server space according to how much money is paid. If your site is big (art gallery etc) and only a handful of people pay, it will be slow. If more people pay, it will be faster. If it's a small site (imageboard), it's no biggie if only a handful of people pay. That would be fair to the hosts too.

FA sorta kinda used to be like that, entirely community funded. Until it got big and Fagoneer sold it off to that SecondLife ripoff that only emo teens and middle aged German businessmen use. I think they yeeted us at some point, probably got tired of the endless drama and content purges.
 
I'm not very optimistic about zoosexuality being normalized and accepted in even the next ten years.
I doubt that I'll see much public acceptance in my lifetime
in fact I was thinking about it a few days ago and the thought of this and never finding any community with other zoos made me feel kinda sick tbh.
so thats why I'm checking this site out (and some others)
 
Goattobeloved said:
Um... ¿Never again?


Year when the lifestyle becomes fully accepted

In what decade do you think the lifestyle would become fully accepted? Personally, the 2050's. I'm more curious as to what needs to happen for it to be accepted. Like I think the first step would be mainstream movies/tv shows that shed light in a positive way will be screened like Beauty and The...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net

Do you think zoo will ever be accepted?

I mean both socially and legally, I'm really insecure about my whole attraction to animals thing but I just kinda hope one day people will see we're not animals pin not intended
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net

Zeta Chronicles

Zeta Chronicles Written by Libbypaw & @ZTHorse Sketch & Line Art by Mr.Coyote Color by Championwhoops/Twitter
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net
Click to expand...
Thank you.

So tired of the same questions
 
it depends where and when, different countries (or even different parts of countries for that matter) have different standards
 
vic21 said:
Yeah, people really need to start recognizing just how smart animals actually are as well. They might not be as advanced as us but they're definitely not as dead stupid as most people seem to think they are. I think the more that becomes common knowledge the more people will eventually come to the conclusion themselves that they're low IQ adults. I'm just optimistic about how long that'll take.
Click to expand...
A good example of how smart some animals are is that one of my neighbor’s goats has learned how to turn the electric fences off.
 
Hey guys consider the following: Overpopulation.

We could be heroes someday y'know. :ROFLMAO:
 
Zoo is illegal in most places. If it were to become accepted and normalized, then it will create a "slippery slope" that will lead to people with other illegal/taboo kinks and fetishes wanting there's to be accepted and normalized as well. Then who decides where to draw the line on what is "right" and "wrong" ?
 
Blazzy said:
Zoo is illegal in most places. If it were to become accepted and normalized, then it will create a "slippery slope" that will lead to people with other illegal kinks and fetishes wanting there's to be accepted and normalized. Then who decides where to draw the line on what is "right" and "wrong" ?
Click to expand...
We can't create the slippery slope. We are the slippery slope.

Who decides right and wrong? Well, if objective morality exists, nobody "decides" it. If all morality is subjective than it's up to... whoever has the most guns?
 
ScotExotic said:
It's easy to draw the line. It's drawn on sexual maturity & consent. That excludes pedophilia and necrophilia right there.
Click to expand...
Not exactly, somebody could sign away their corpse....

Stoli said:
Blazzy said:
Zoo is illegal in most places. If it were to become accepted and normalized, then it will create a "slippery slope" that will lead to people with other illegal/taboo kinks and fetishes wanting there's to be accepted and normalized as well. Then who decides where to draw the line on what is "right" and "wrong" ?
Click to expand...
Who decides right and wrong? Well, if objective morality exists, nobody "decides" it. If all morality is subjective than it's up to... whoever has the most guns?
Click to expand...
It's not often that somebody answers a philosophical question exactly the same way I would.
 
ScotExotic said:
It's easy to draw the line. It's drawn on sexual maturity & consent. That excludes pedophilia and necrophilia right there.
Click to expand...
Not saying I disagree, but I think it's important to realize that morality is extremely arbitrary and not absolute. Someone's moral compass can be influenced by their culture, country, beliefs, ideologies, the way they were raised, etc. So what you and I see as wrong or right can be very different than the next person.
 
Blazzy said:
Not saying I disagree, but I think it's important to realize that morality is extremely arbitrary and not absolute. Someone's moral compass can be influenced by their culture, country, beliefs, ideologies, the way they were raised, etc. So what you and I see as wrong or right can be very different than the next person.
Click to expand...
Then what's the problem with a slippery slope?
 
ScotExotic said:
The slippery slope can go both ways. Either into oppression or chaos. Both are hell.
Click to expand...
Oppression is a moral concept. A lot of people confuse themselves by mixing moral and amoral concepts. To say something (like a slippery slope real or imagined) is bad is to make a moral claim. It can only be bad if the thing at the bottom of the slope is bad, and if the speaker and listener both agree it's bad there is a common moral ground already.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top