B
BlueBeard
Guest
I agree. They are true if they can be proven true.
I appreciate this. Thank you.
So answer me, is the "killing" of gays just because they are gay (in countries where is legal to kill them) is that murder? Or it is not murder just because the law says it is not murder?
Nah nah nah. We were going to deal with the topic at hand. We were going to avoid non sequiturs, red herrings. Gay people are gay people by definition. To kill a person unlawfully is murder.
If you're still trying to get "murder" to apply to animals, that's a dead end -- unless..... Say, try it the other way. Can you make an argument that an animal is a person? Then killing it unlawfully would be murder. Big ask, but... that's what it would take, right?
What about zoosex, the law says it is animal abuse, so it must be animal abuse because the law say so, right? The law is never wrong, is that your argument?
No, I never said the law was never wrong. I said your definition was contrived. You made it up. (See how you are?
Animal murder is not murder just because the law say so? Right? Have you though that the law may be wrong and that animal murder is actually animal murder? Or that legal killing gays is actually gay murder despite what the law says?
Killing gay people unlawfully is always murder.
Killing animals is never "murder," no matter what the means or motivation.
I don't know how to say that any more clearly. There's no changing those facts because... well... they're facts.
Last edited by a moderator: