How many are zoo exclusive?

[Repreive]

Where did you find that?

As to the need to find excuses, I agree, it's annoying but you get used to it overtime. As I live in a pretty conservative environment and almost never have female visitors I keep stressing that I am not homosexual. Even if I had a dog I don't expect ppl to think I am a zoo, but that might change if I had a female animal, I suppose.

The quote? It's mostly just a joke, utter nonsense. Still funny tho'. Torn between including the proper title and just the name...
Like...

"There's nothing better than the inside of a horse."
~Vice President, Michael Pence (Paraphrased)

 

[marriedkinks]

Not zoo exclusive, but we decided that my husband is only going to get anal and bjs and save my V for the dogs =) So kinda right?

 

[juan_doe_drei]

no.

zoo exclusive isn't a "i'm sick of humans" nor "i'm only doing sex in certain ways", it's "i'm not attracted to humans".

 

[Rainbowgazer]

no.

zoo exclusive isn't a "i'm sick of humans" nor "i'm only doing sex in certain ways", it's "i'm not attracted to humans".

That's absolutely it. When I finally overcame my upbringing and education it became clear that I would never try a human sexual partner again.

 

[Austral]

Not zoo exclusive, but we decided that my husband is only going to get anal and bjs and save my V for the dogs =) So kinda right?

That's an interesting way to manage birth control

 

[ILoveFemaleGSD's]

Never had a human or animal partner but I only want an animal partner. No people, please.

 

[youandme2022]

Wij mogen ons gelukkig prijzen als zoo koppel .

 

[CamoCowboy]

I might as well be. Haven't had an actual human partner since I was in my early 20's.

 

[kaliceadog]

i'm a slut for all, animals, womens, mens.

 

[Danglers]

Im mostly zoo exclusive

 

[MsMolly]

Appreciate the question and the responses, gotta say, after being ghosted, yet again, I think I’d be content zoo exclusive.

 

[ILoveFemaleGSD's]

Appreciate the question and the responses, gotta say, after being ghosted, yet again, I think I’d be content zoo exclusive.

Zoo exclusive is more of a thing you are as a zoophile, where you don't have any desire for a human partner. Unless like if you have lost all attraction to people, then I'd say you are zoo exclusive.

I'm only being stubborn with what it means to actually be zoo exclusive because I myself actually am zoo exclusive and feel nothing for people (beyond platonic love). I have absolutely no desire to be with a human and the idea of having sex with one is very negative, borderline repulsive, whereas with my animal of choice (female German shepherd, which sadly I don't have yet) the idea of having sex with her is extremely desirable. The only way I get aroused when looking at a human is if it is a man (sorry, ladies, you do nothing for me) and he is ejalculating, because then I think of that happening inside of a dog, specifically a German shepherd.

 

[Animale]

gotta say, after being ghosted, yet again, I think I’d be content zoo exclusive.

Yup right there with ya lol

 

[MsMolly]

Zoo exclusive is more of a thing you are as a zoophile, where you don't have any desire for a human partner. Unless like if you have lost all attraction to people, then I'd say you are zoo exclusive.

I'm only being stubborn with what it means to actually be zoo exclusive because I myself actually am zoo exclusive and feel nothing for people (beyond platonic love). I have absolutely no desire to be with a human and the idea of having sex with one is very negative, borderline repulsive, whereas with my animal of choice (female German shepherd, which sadly I don't have yet) the idea of having sex with her is extremely desirable. The only way I get aroused when looking at a human is if it is a man (sorry, ladies, you do nothing for me) and he is ejalculating, because then I think of that happening inside of a dog, specifically a German shepherd.

Thanks for sharing… we all have our own journey ?

 

[ILoveFemaleGSD's]

Thanks for sharing… we all have our own journey ?

I'm just trying to explain that someone who is zoo exclusive is not just someone who, by your own words, "thinks [they would] be content zoo exclusive" (zoo exclusive meaning with just an animal for a partner). I even found a guy who said he was psychologically tested and found to be completely zoo exclusive, being indifferent towards people and completely unarroused by them. There is no need to be an asshole and give me the middle finger, whether just an emoji or not.

 

[arto]

Não é exclusivo do zoológico. Apenas sou muito exigente na minha escolha de humanos... e raramente fico com eles. Então fico com animais até que o humano certo retorne o interesse.

Interesting, and what would this human be like, right?

 

[Duckkus]

I guess I didn’t realize there was a gatekeeper for zoo terminology. Had I known I would have responded the way I do to most other authoritative figures, which is to properly salute with two fingers, not one! ??

Don’t Yuck my Yum!

If your objective was to share your preferred definition of “Zoo Exclusive” maybe try just sharing it rather than directing it at someone and maybe it will be received better, but since you directed it at me I will most definitely tell you to kindly fuck off because I don’t appreciate the “education” your trying to direct at me.

Don't yuck my yum is my new favourite phrase!

 

[MsMolly]

Don't yuck my yum is my new favourite phrase!

Don't yuck my yum is my new favourite phrase!

I can’t take credit for it, but I do love it

 

[ILoveFemaleGSD's]

If your objective was to share your preferred definition of “Zoo Exclusive” maybe try just sharing it rather than directing it at someone and maybe it will be received better, but since you directed it at me I will most definitely tell you to kindly fuck off because I don’t appreciate the “education” your trying to direct at me.

Interesting. I only directed towards you because I could see that you have a misunderstanding. I tried to politely correct you.

If you're wondering why it took me so long to get around to this, it's because I've all but abandoned this shithole of a website in favor of a much better place, so I didn't even know about your reply until I got a pm over on the other forum from someone who wanted to talk to me about you (an exclusive, actually) and your immature and childish behavior. I was trying to be nice and explain to you that being zoo exclusive isn't just being able to be content with just an animal partner, it's only being able to be content with an animal partner. How do I know? Well, a few ways. First, it's not just my personal definition, it's pretty well agreed upon by me and my fellow exclusives. Second, it's the story of my fucking life. I, just like my fellow exclusives, can't be happy with a human partner. You, on the other hand, have the self righteousness to declare that you are a zoo exclusive because you can be content with just an animal because you can't make it with a human. You are resorting to it as a next best thing. For me, and my fellow exclusives, there is no better thing. This is the best thing. And quite frankly, after my interactions with you, it's no mystery as to why no one likes you. Apologies, but the truth can hurt. Good day.

 

[ILoveFemaleGSD's]

Dude, I could care less why it took you so long to respond

I know and knew that

I had forgotten about this conversation like I forgot about you.

Same. Until I got messaged on an entirely seperste forum about you

take your judgment and kindly fuck off.

No judgement from me. You defined something incorrectly, and I politely corrected you. Then you became an asshole

Adieu

 

[FinnMcFissile]

Exclusive, would be me.

 

[seahorse999]

Still figuring it out? Sex with other people still feels good I'm just not as interested.

 

[Rainbowgazer]

Interesting. I only directed towards you because I could see that you have a misunderstanding. I tried to politely correct you.

If you're wondering why it took me so long to get around to this, it's because I've all but abandoned this shithole of a website in favor of a much better place, so I didn't even know about your reply until I got a pm over on the other forum from someone who wanted to talk to me about you (an exclusive, actually) and your immature and childish behavior. I was trying to be nice and explain to you that being zoo exclusive isn't just being able to be content with just an animal partner, it's only being able to be content with an animal partner. How do I know? Well, a few ways. First, it's not just my personal definition, it's pretty well agreed upon by me and my fellow exclusives. Second, it's the story of my fucking life. I, just like my fellow exclusives, can't be happy with a human partner. You, on the other hand, have the self righteousness to declare that you are a zoo exclusive because you can be content with just an animal because you can't make it with a human. You are resorting to it as a next best thing. For me, and my fellow exclusives, there is no better thing. This is the best thing. And quite frankly, after my interactions with you, it's no mystery as to why no one likes you. Apologies, but the truth can hurt. Good day.

My first impulse to react to this text was with a "like", as juan_doe_drei did as I agree to most of what you say. But what I don't like is this confrontative way as in "it's no mystery why no one likes you". I didn't read the whole communication and therefore can't judge at all whose statement I support more (though I guess it's yours), but I'd prefer another kind of discussion in which the opposite side is not so ultimately degraded.

 

[juan_doe_drei]

My first impulse to react to this text was with a "like", as juan_doe_drei did as I agree to most of what you say. But what I don't like is this confrontative way as in "it's no mystery why no one likes you". I didn't read the whole communication and therefore can't judge at all whose statement I support more (though I guess it's yours), but I'd prefer another kind of discussion in which the opposite side is not so ultimately degraded.

?

fair point.

it's one of those things that has irked me for a while as well, but i looked back up, and @MsMolly did not actually say she considers herself zoo exclusive, so there was definitely a bit of misunderstanding on @ILoveFemaleGSD's and my part. so..

my apologies, Ms Molly.

in the interest of understanding, i would like to explain why it gets under my skin when people who are sick of dating declare themselves zoo exclusive (until they fall in love again). there are struggles with being zoo exclusive that aren't something that people who are attracted to both animals and humans inherently have to deal with (though admittedly, due to circumstances, they might also share some of the struggles of a zoo exclusive).

#1 is aging. do you have someone who will take care of you as you age to the point of needing someone else to help you care for yourself? a zoo exclusive is less likely to, but it's not a guarantee, i admit. some zoo exclusives (like myself) have found a roommate who is also zoo exclusive, and the plan is to grow old together and hopefully find someone younger than us who would like to join our small slice of heaven with the expectation of caring for the animals with us and hopefully sticking around to care for _us_ as we age, because we sure aren't going to have children to do that. that said, though, someone who _isn't_ zoo exclusive could also end up in the same situation as they age if they don't find someone to be in a committed relationship with, or they commit to someone of the same sex and therefore don't have children either.
sorry, that was really wordy... i hope you get what i'm saying.

#2 is the pain of the death cycle -- companions dying several times over the course of one's life. this happens less to equine-focused zoos, but it still happens. again, without a human companion around, it's harder to deal with the pain of the loss with someone who understands that it wasn't "just a pet". but also, it doesn't negate the chance of this happening to someone who isn't zoo exclusive.

eh... my brain is tired. i know i had more to add to this, but i can't recall what else i wanted to say. we all have struggles as zoophiles. zoo exclusives simply have a different set of struggles (most likely).

 

[ILoveFemaleGSD's]

My first impulse to react to this text was with a "like", as juan_doe_drei did as I agree to most of what you say. But what I don't like is this confrontative way as in "it's no mystery why no one likes you". I didn't read the whole communication and therefore can't judge at all whose statement I support more (though I guess it's yours), but I'd prefer another kind of discussion in which the opposite side is not so ultimately degraded.

Have you looked at how she has talked to me? Swears me up and down, given several middle fingers (emojis count), etc. Was my comment maybe a step to far, yes I'll admit that, but so is saying fuck you just for trying to make sure she has a clear understanding of what it means to be a zoo exclusive, because with the way her original post was worded it seemed as though she thinks being zoo exclusive is merely just something one can be content with, rather than an actual permanent lifestyle that is the only thing that makes one happy.

 

[juan_doe_drei]

Have you looked at how she has talked to me? Swears me up and down, given several middle fingers (emojis count), etc. Was my comment maybe a step to far, yes I'll admit that, but so is saying fuck you just for trying to make sure she has a clear understanding of what it means to be a zoo exclusive, because with the way her original post was worded it seemed as though she thinks being zoo exclusive is merely just something one can be content with, rather than an actual permanent lifestyle that is the only thing that makes one happy.

right, but she may have meant "i could be content with being zoo exclusive (had i been born that way instead"

and apologies. my post above appears before , but it took me so long to edit the post that you( @ILoveFemaleGSD's ) weren't able to take what i said into account with your reply.

this -- https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/how-many-are-zoo-exclusive.410/page-15#post-2745170

 

[Animale]

I think as soon as name calling comes on either side the argument is already lost and both sides have failed because you only resort to name calling when you have nothing intelligent to add to the conversation. Just my opinion. as far as the topic. I think there could be a few different ways to interpret it. The word exclusive simply means excluding anything else. So someone who is zoo exclusive for their whole life is def zoo exclusive. And someone who goes a period of time be it 6 months a year or more that they were only with their dog then during that time they were zoo exclusive by definition because they excluded everything but their animal at that time. So both sides are right. why does someone always have to be wrong? Why cant we acknowledge were all different but were still in the same boat. There isnt exactly a lot of us.

 

[ILoveFemaleGSD's]

this -- https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/how-many-are-zoo-exclusive.410/page-15#post-2745170

That's a great way to go about explaining it, where you said about the dating and what not. Thanks

 

[juan_doe_drei]

I think as soon as name calling comes on either side the argument is already lost and both sides have failed because you only resort to name calling when you have nothing intelligent to add to the conversation. Just my opinion. as far as the topic. I think there could be a few different ways to interpret it. The word exclusive simply means excluding anything else. So someone who is zoo exclusive for their whole life is def zoo exclusive. And someone who goes a period of time be it 6 months a year or more that they were only with their dog then during that time they were zoo exclusive by definition because they excluded everything but their animal at that time. So both sides are right. why does someone always have to be wrong? Why cant we acknowledge were all different but were still in the same boat. There isnt exactly a lot of us.

i was going to reply to this earlier, then changed my mind.
then changed my mind again.

i wanted to say "but it IS different", but i clearly laid out in my previous post that i can't deny that there are similarities between zoo exclusives and those who are zoo but not life-long exclusives (or exclusive by attraction rather than by circumstance). maybe it just boils down to ego -- "but it's our label, we made it, not them, and it's all i have to hold onto that makes me special!"

*shrug*

so maybe it just needs a new label? or as many have said (probably for millennia), perhaps labels are kinda pointless. .. but they're not _entirely_ useless... they can make statements a bit more concise as long as everyone knows the full context, but clearly, not everyone does, and maybe it doesn't matter.

perhaps what this poll _should_ have said was "how many zoophiles here aren't attracted to humans?"

 

[Animale]

perhaps what this poll _should_ have said was "how many zoophiles here aren't attracted to humans?"

I think this would have cleared up the entire argument for sure.