D
Deleted member 281309
Guest
143523
I am however not sure of who is the older one of me and @YanchaOkami , one of the mysteries of Europe.
True, but even younger people have an interest in older languages.רוב האנשים כבר לא יכולים להבין את השפה הישנה. הזמן מתאדה כמו ענן של אדי גבינת עז הרים. ?![]()
I'm not too sure about that.I'm older than you, even in this body. ?![]()
On zoo spaces? I surely hope not! LolMaybe he started webbing at a really young age?
So around 30 +/- a couple of years.143534 i did, still remember that a a kid we were connecting the computer to a phone line, to g online, so thats about my age
?On zoo spaces? I surely hope not! Lol
Yes, and for all the others there are online translation services.True, but even younger people have an interest in older languages.
Oh, I'm quite sure about it. But it doesn't matter at all.I'm not too sure about that.
On zoo spaces? I surely hope not! Lol
Well, to be fair, I left out that detail on the prior post. It's what I get for being vague.?
That was definitely not what I had in mind when reading "being on the internet".
Well, you got me there.Yes, and for all the others there are online translation services.![]()
Alright then, keep your secretsOh, I'm quite sure about it. But it doesn't matter at all.
Aww, you deem me relevant ??You people stated your age range beforehand and it is not that hard to guess.
One of the advantages of never forgetting anything deemed relevant.
Well, probably not a ban, but probably a post removal or even possibly a warning strike. As flamming is against the rules outside of the DF.Insults about ones physical appearance = ban, temp or perma if not in The Dumpster Fire, correct?
Alright then, keep your secrets
# Frodo meme
Aww, you deem me relevant ??
For example someone descriping his or her lover by using the term of a male animal, and me replying something in the line that I understand why they need X, because they sure are a "female name of said animal".
That would violate the rules?
I fully understand and supports this decision of yours.1Sometimes foxes have to do that.
Imagine how easy it would be to get recognized out there if any media corporation interviews one for more than a regional newspaper article.
No matter the relevance. You people know quite a lot about my real hobbies, interests.
If there would be a really hard-linked proof of "me loving dogs / horses / whatever animal sexually", this can ruin the company. As long as there are only "guesses" and "thoughts" of individuals, all is fine.
But the more unusual someones private lifestyle is, the less room to specify precise ages and / or actual situations at such a website like this one exists.
Then I would have to try and come off as intelligent, don't want to disappoint you too much.Sure. Why not? I respect intelligent animals, including intelligent humans.
I, hypotetically, had more of calling someone with a larger figure a "cow", when talking about the "bull" that was about to indulge in sexual intercourse in mind.Hum, I don't think, "bitch" should be used for female dogs in a derogatory instance, neither for humans. But some humans actually loving being called by this term, I don't know why.