• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Count to ∞!

143537

MrsShemon said:
True, but even younger people have an interest in older languages.
Click to expand...
Yes, and for all the others there are online translation services. (y)

MrsShemon said:
I'm not too sure about that.
Click to expand...
Oh, I'm quite sure about it. But it doesn't matter at all.

You people stated your age range beforehand and it is not that hard to guess.
One of the advantages of never forgetting anything deemed relevant.

FloofyNewfie said:
On zoo spaces? I surely hope not! Lol
Click to expand...

Lol, oh it's strictly against the rules to talk about it. As such just forget it.

But what I can say is that I was online as early as 9-10 years of age not related to anything sexual, at that time, tho. But I know the .nets well.
 
143542

Insults about ones physical appearance = ban, temp or perma if not in The Dumpster Fire, correct?

For example someone descriping his or her lover by using the term of a male animal, and me replying something in the line that I understand why they need X, because they sure are a "female name of said animal".
That would violate the rules?
In my understanding it would.

Hypotetically of course.
 
143546

MrsShemon said:
Alright then, keep your secrets
# Frodo meme
Click to expand...

Sometimes foxes have to do that.
Imagine how easy it would be to get recognized out there if any media corporation interviews one for more than a regional newspaper article.
No matter the relevance. You people know quite a lot about my real hobbies, interests.

If there would be a really hard-linked proof of "me loving dogs / horses / whatever animal sexually", this can ruin the company. As long as there are only "guesses" and "thoughts" of individuals, all is fine.

But the more unusual someones private lifestyle is, the less room to specify precise ages and / or actual situations at such a website like this one exists.

MrsShemon said:
Aww, you deem me relevant ??
Click to expand...

Sure. Why not? I respect intelligent animals, including intelligent humans.

MrsShemon said:
For example someone descriping his or her lover by using the term of a male animal, and me replying something in the line that I understand why they need X, because they sure are a "female name of said animal".
That would violate the rules?
Click to expand...

Hum, I don't think, "bitch" should be used for female dogs in a derogatory instance, neither for humans. But some humans actually loving being called by this term, I don't know why.
 
143547
YanchaOkami said:
1Sometimes foxes have to do that.
Imagine how easy it would be to get recognized out there if any media corporation interviews one for more than a regional newspaper article.
No matter the relevance. You people know quite a lot about my real hobbies, interests.

If there would be a really hard-linked proof of "me loving dogs / horses / whatever animal sexually", this can ruin the company. As long as there are only "guesses" and "thoughts" of individuals, all is fine.

But the more unusual someones private lifestyle is, the less room to specify precise ages and / or actual situations at such a website like this one exists.
Click to expand...
I fully understand and supports this decision of yours.
I was merely joking earlier.
YanchaOkami said:
Sure. Why not? I respect intelligent animals, including intelligent humans.
Click to expand...
Then I would have to try and come off as intelligent, don't want to disappoint you too much.
YanchaOkami said:
Hum, I don't think, "bitch" should be used for female dogs in a derogatory instance, neither for humans. But some humans actually loving being called by this term, I don't know why.
Click to expand...
I, hypotetically, had more of calling someone with a larger figure a "cow", when talking about the "bull" that was about to indulge in sexual intercourse in mind.
Hypotetically.
 
143552

As I have pretty much admitted what I wanted to do, I will slap my own fingers and issue a fitting punishment.

For the intention of insulting another member MrsShemon was not on friendly terms with, she is hearby punished by MrsShemon with a week temporary ban(self imposed restriction to log in, really)
 
143553

MrsShemon said:
I was merely joking earlier.
Click to expand...

Don't worry. Floofy was quite correct with his higher age limit spectrum. As such not that young.

MrsShemon said:
Then I would have to try and come off as intelligent, don't want to disappoint you too much.
Click to expand...

No need to prove what's already been proven by behavior. (y) Everyone has a few bad days, but there are clear differences between users which behave intelligent and those which let their hormones decide over their actual actions while shutting the brain into "eco-saving modus", unfortunately.

The hypothetical cow is interesting. ? ❤️

Almost has the charm of Schrödinger's cat.

MrsShemon said:
For the intention of insulting another member MrsShemon was not on friendly terms with, she is hearby punished by MrsShemon with a week temporary ban(self imposed restriction to log in, really)
Click to expand...

What?! For a thought-concept? :unsure:
Then just don't log out, that's fulfilling your punishment without hindering your participation. ?‍♂️
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top