Count to ∞!

[MrsShemon]

143519

No need to be specific. Just a confirmation from me that I have not pictured your age that far from your actual age.

 

[Mare Lover 1975]

143520

 

[FloofyNewfie]

1435 Legal age to purchase alcohol in the U.S.

 

[MrsShemon]

143522

And I will guess @Mare Lover 1975 to be somewhere around 47 to 49.

 

[Deleted member 281309]

143523

 

[jvbeek89]

I'm definitely younger then 143524

 

[ath]

143525

 

[MrsShemon]

143526

I am however not sure of who is the older one of me and @YanchaOkami , one of the mysteries of Europe.

 

[jvbeek89]

As long we are all younger then 143527, i'm okay with it

 

[YanchaOkami]

143528

רוב האנשים כבר לא יכולים להבין את השפה הישנה. הזמן מתאדה כמו ענן של אדי גבינת עז הרים. ?‍

I am however not sure of who is the older one of me and @YanchaOkami , one of the mysteries of Europe.

I'm older than you, even in this body. ?

 

[FloofyNewfie]

143529

How does Moses make tea?

Hebrews it!

 

[MrsShemon]

143530

רוב האנשים כבר לא יכולים להבין את השפה הישנה. הזמן מתאדה כמו ענן של אדי גבינת עז הרים. ?‍

True, but even younger people have an interest in older languages.

I'm older than you, even in this body. ?

I'm not too sure about that.

 

[FloofyNewfie]

143531

I'd imagine Yancha is in his late 30s or early 40s, since I believe he's mentioned being on the internet in the late 90. But I could be wrong on that.

 

[MrsShemon]

143532

Maybe he started webbing at a really young age?

 

[Deleted member 281309]

143533

Hey yall ??

 

[jvbeek89]

143534 i did, still remember that a a kid we were connecting the computer to a phone line, to g online, so thats about my age

 

[FloofyNewfie]

14 double 35

Maybe he started webbing at a really young age?

On zoo spaces? I surely hope not! Lol

 

[MrsShemon]

143536

143534 i did, still remember that a a kid we were connecting the computer to a phone line, to g online, so thats about my age

So around 30 +/- a couple of years.

On zoo spaces? I surely hope not! Lol

?
That was definitely not what I had in mind when reading "being on the internet".

 

[YanchaOkami]

143537

True, but even younger people have an interest in older languages.

Yes, and for all the others there are online translation services.

I'm not too sure about that.

Oh, I'm quite sure about it. But it doesn't matter at all.

You people stated your age range beforehand and it is not that hard to guess.
One of the advantages of never forgetting anything deemed relevant.

On zoo spaces? I surely hope not! Lol

Lol, oh it's strictly against the rules to talk about it. As such just forget it.

But what I can say is that I was online as early as 9-10 years of age not related to anything sexual, at that time, tho. But I know the .nets well.

 

[FloofyNewfie]

143538

?
That was definitely not what I had in mind when reading "being on the internet".

Well, to be fair, I left out that detail on the prior post. It's what I get for being vague.

 

[jvbeek89]

So around 30 +/- a couple of years.

Easy guess, but yes

143539

 

[MrsShemon]

143540

Yes, and for all the others there are online translation services.

Well, you got me there.

Oh, I'm quite sure about it. But it doesn't matter at all.

Alright then, keep your secrets
# Frodo meme

You people stated your age range beforehand and it is not that hard to guess.
One of the advantages of never forgetting anything deemed relevant.

Aww, you deem me relevant ??

 

[FloofyNewfie]

143541

 

[MrsShemon]

143542

Insults about ones physical appearance = ban, temp or perma if not in The Dumpster Fire, correct?

For example someone descriping his or her lover by using the term of a male animal, and me replying something in the line that I understand why they need X, because they sure are a "female name of said animal".
That would violate the rules?
In my understanding it would.

Hypotetically of course.

 

[Deleted member 281309]

143543

 

[FloofyNewfie]

1435 double 4

Insults about ones physical appearance = ban, temp or perma if not in The Dumpster Fire, correct?

Well, probably not a ban, but probably a post removal or even possibly a warning strike. As flamming is against the rules outside of the DF.

 

[MrsShemon]

143545

That settles it then. No point in gaining a warning strike if the reason for that strike gets deleted.

 

[YanchaOkami]

143546

Alright then, keep your secrets
# Frodo meme

Sometimes foxes have to do that.
Imagine how easy it would be to get recognized out there if any media corporation interviews one for more than a regional newspaper article.
No matter the relevance. You people know quite a lot about my real hobbies, interests.

If there would be a really hard-linked proof of "me loving dogs / horses / whatever animal sexually", this can ruin the company. As long as there are only "guesses" and "thoughts" of individuals, all is fine.

But the more unusual someones private lifestyle is, the less room to specify precise ages and / or actual situations at such a website like this one exists.

Aww, you deem me relevant ??

Sure. Why not? I respect intelligent animals, including intelligent humans.

For example someone descriping his or her lover by using the term of a male animal, and me replying something in the line that I understand why they need X, because they sure are a "female name of said animal".
That would violate the rules?

Hum, I don't think, "bitch" should be used for female dogs in a derogatory instance, neither for humans. But some humans actually loving being called by this term, I don't know why.

 

[MrsShemon]

143547

1Sometimes foxes have to do that.
Imagine how easy it would be to get recognized out there if any media corporation interviews one for more than a regional newspaper article.
No matter the relevance. You people know quite a lot about my real hobbies, interests.

If there would be a really hard-linked proof of "me loving dogs / horses / whatever animal sexually", this can ruin the company. As long as there are only "guesses" and "thoughts" of individuals, all is fine.

But the more unusual someones private lifestyle is, the less room to specify precise ages and / or actual situations at such a website like this one exists.

I fully understand and supports this decision of yours.
I was merely joking earlier.

Sure. Why not? I respect intelligent animals, including intelligent humans.

Then I would have to try and come off as intelligent, don't want to disappoint you too much.

Hum, I don't think, "bitch" should be used for female dogs in a derogatory instance, neither for humans. But some humans actually loving being called by this term, I don't know why.

I, hypotetically, had more of calling someone with a larger figure a "cow", when talking about the "bull" that was about to indulge in sexual intercourse in mind.
Hypotetically.

 

[FloofyNewfie]

143548