• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Count to ∞!

140084

I figured that was the time in your current location. Since your profile location states "From Europe / Germany quite often" I simply Googled the current time in Germany. Lol

Nope, it was pretty much due to the reasons I had listed in the threads. If Salty wants to create another one that completely omits the whole sexual aspect of it all, I'd be fine with that. But as it stands now I don't really see any reasons to bring it back. I may get with a couple of the other staff members and see if we can devise a "minimum age" requirement for sexual activity for the rules. But doing so would be a bit tricky since I don't think any of us have any experience outside of dogs, horses, cows, goats, and maybe sheep. When it comes to dogs I can't just say "no less than the second heat" as you have your oddballs like Salukis which often have their first heat at 1.5 years old. Trying to clarify it outside of "must be of breedable age" is probably going to be an absolute clusterfuck. If a decision is reached, I'll post an update in the threads.
 
140086

Yep, aside from business meetings (quite often around the EU, less abroad) it's mostly Germany right now.

Like written earlier: At the moment we try to establish a hightech new sort of business, would mean it needs at least a high six digit sum from investment companies, this is a hassle. Banks are contracts with devils, tho. :ROFLMAO:

FloofyNewfie said:
Nope, it was pretty much due to the reasons I had listed in the threads. If Salty wants to create another one that completely omits the whole sexual aspect of it all, I'd be fine with that. But as it stands now I don't really see any reasons to bring it back.
Click to expand...

As I don't know that thread wholly, I can only describe like it reads. It's as if it counted like a diary of him loving to report over the growing-up and development (not specifically sexual from how it sounds) of his new doggy girl and that's what he misses much. That's why I wondered that not only the postings related to the heat were removed, if there "should be" such a big amount of diary-like stuff beforehand.

But at the end: it's a result from his action, as such he has to get along with it. If he doesn't want to stay at the forum or just re-do the story-diary sort of reporting in a new thread, that's sad but ultimately his decision.. I can't imagine it would be too hard to post the diary-stories again in 2-3 postings in a new thread and I am sure people would be happy to follow the development of his girl as well as the bonding of the both.

FloofyNewfie said:
When it comes to dogs I can't just say "no less than the second heat" as you have your oddballs like Salukis which often have their first heat at 1.5 years old. Trying to clarify it outside of "must be of breedable age" is probably going to be an absolute clusterfuck.
Click to expand...

That doesn't work.. true. You would necessarily need a hard number, not a "status quo" of her breedability (lol).

It could be based on something like: "No sexual interaction below the age of -throw a fair number of months, like 12- to be shown off or described between any female/male dog and humans, dogs or other animals. Playing between younger dogs is fine (no intercourse).
If a female dog is in heat, posting media or interactions about it is allowed starting from her being at least 12 months of age. The media has to be made after she reached this age."

Else it's really a wild dice as I know dogs which reached first heat at 4,75 months of age. 🤷‍♂️

Others reached first heat at 17,5 to even 21+ months of age. And that would be fine (I don't see any development-sided problem with it, breeders wouldn't see one as well).

And even if they're in heat and fertile with under 5 months of age.. it's logical that nobody with the dogs mental and physical health in mind would either suggest intercourse between her and another dog, nor a human / other animal. That's just a young dog, almost puppy..
 
140087

I see the hardship here. In humans we have said "18 and above", despite "breedable age" happening before that. And dogs are very different where saying "1,5 years and above" would mean that some of the larger breeds have not stopped growing yet. And some have their second heat before turning a year.
So neither a set age nor a number of heats could apply to all dogs as they would have different mental and physical maturity depending on what breed they are.

As we can say that humans live around 80-85 years on average, it would be around 20% of their expected lifetime when it is okey to have sex with them.
So maybe something similar in dogs? As a breed that lives for a shorter time hit second heat and physical maturity earlier than a breed expected to live longer?

But this is not really the place for these discussions.
 
140088

Welcome to the lil' devil! 👋

MrsShemon said:
So maybe something similar in dogs? As a breed that lives for a shorter time hit second heat and physical maturity earlier than a breed expected to live longer?
Click to expand...

Hard to do, as well. Not to mention it would cause more confusion for all those with less information about their (any) breed of dog in mind.

An age number would probably be the best, but 12 months might be too early as well. People might .. abuse the rule by telling their 9 month old dog is 12 months old. 15 months maybe? There you see more clear signs of bone structure growth, muscular one as well, ratios or in relation to the sexual development.

And then there's the big "?" how to verify it.. aside the way that's used right now: by individual judgment through mods / admins. Not sure if in the US they -have- to have a pet passport or comparable.. Here it would be easy to fake, tho.

From my opinion a number of age plus two- or even three-person judgment by experienced mods/admins based on the media files is fine. As that's as precise as it gets. False positives / negatives would still occur, but there's something to link the people to and less hassle around it.

As it's just thoughts and ideas, I don't think the place for discussion is relevant. Mindstorming doesn't worse a situation which is given. (y)
 
140089
YanchaOkami said:
Welcome to the lil' devil! 👋
Click to expand...
I am not that little, even if I am not huge.
YanchaOkami said:
Hard to do, as well. Not to mention it would cause more confusion for all those with less information about their (any) breed of dog in mind.
Click to expand...
But with a "20/25% of expected lifetime", we would pretty much end up in the 15-18 months gap.
YanchaOkami said:
An age number would probably be the best, but 12 months might be too early as well. People might .. abuse the rule by telling their 9 month old dog is 12 months old. 15 months maybe? There you see more clear signs of bone structure growth, muscular one as well, ratios or in relation to the sexual development.

And then there's the big "?" how to verify it.. aside the way that's used right now: by individual judgment through mods / admins. Not sure if in the US they -have- to have a pet passport or comparable.. Here it would be easy to fake, tho.

From my opinion a number of age plus two- or even three-person judgment by experienced mods/admins based on the media files is fine. As that's as precise as it gets. False positives / negatives would still occur, but there's something to link the people to and less hassle around it.
Click to expand...
Absolutely, experienced people reviewing the content and reaching a consensus would likely be the best course of action. But a defined minimum age, as with humans, can't really be just a bad idea, can it?
YanchaOkami said:
As it's just thoughts and ideas, I don't think the place for discussion is relevant. Mindstorming doesn't worse a situation which is given. (y)
Click to expand...
It is just that I have seen many threads relocated to the DF depending on what people started to talk about in them, and I would hate for this thread to end up there.
 
140090
Do you want me to call you big devil instead? :unsure: :husky_grin: It's just a descriptive metaphor, not a factual analysis. I don't know you "live", anyways. (y)

MrsShemon said:
But a defined minimum age, as with humans, can't really be just a bad idea, can it?
Click to expand...
Exactly.. It would lessen the unsure confusion of people and maybe (with some luck and people using their brain cells actively! I know, my hope has no boundaries! ❤️) even prevent them from "accidentally" posting such media files or stories.

Probably it would be good to exclude prior media from the years before establishment of the new rule from this, as to not cause unneeded harassment and war. It's easy to check by the date of creation / last edit and prevents internal targeting of users due to personal disliking.

MrsShemon said:
.. and I would hate for this thread to end up there.
Click to expand...

Oh, that won't happen I hope. If it's that annoying to have a bit mindstorming here.. they could just delete my postings and that's fine with me.
After all the topic is already finished for me and I accept the decisions (without interest in knowing everything, just some clearance was helpful).
 
140091
YanchaOkami said:
Do you want me to call you big devil instead? :unsure: :husky_grin: It's just a descriptive metaphor, not a factual analysis. I don't know you "live", anyways. (y)
Click to expand...
Just a joke from my side, I don't mind to be called lil', little, small, tiny et cetera. Because I am more or less those things.
I don't mind to be called huge, big, fat either, as I am not those things and the one calling me that is simply wrong in their assumptions.
 
140092

For me (> 6"3) most people are small or mostly: casually sized, but I don't see size as any important aspect.

Smaller people have disadvantages and advantages in sports, for my size it's actually a challenge to control all the muscle fibers in a manner which doesn't look weird, this means: if you focus on just "sending signals to your legs" it wouldn't work out very smooth and actually anger me.

Doing this in a more smooth manner consciously is a) exhausting and b) slower as the subconscious mind works hundreds of times faster (but less feedback-loop related, it's semi-automatic subconscious).

Comparable to you walking down a stair consciously, not by your subconscious mind. It will get very stressing, believe me. It's the compromise of being very fast and being big: usually you look sleazy or jerky, not smooth. :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
140093

Yancha is a foot taller than me. Proof of me being lil' have been provided.

Biggest issues with competing with taller people are their reach. Not easy to fight with someone that out-reach you. You being smaller does not equal to you being faster or more nible.
Only one thing to do when fighting a bigger opponent (besides running away from there) and that is to get in close.
Shorter distance between the hip and knee means that up close, you can knee kick while the larger opponent can't, their elbows are still a factor to take in huge consideration, but your own elbows against their chin and knees to their legs and belly might very well settle the fight in your favor.
 
140094

If they're males, you can just grab their testicles and squeeze them VERY carefully (please!), they'll instinctively bow down a bit to protect them.
Or just fake a kick to them (don't kick them, please). They'll bow down instinctively as well, leaving their fingers or hands which are raised above their head probably in reach for you.

As long as you don't hurt them you can just laugh it off as a trick and they're probably bamboozled.

If they're females (rarely 6"3 I guess) ram them two fingers left and right below the rib cage in the sides of their stomach. Not too hard. Just enough so they "twitch" and curl together a bit.

It's plainly impossible to keep something held high into the air while getting such an attack. In some cases they'll let it fall out of the hand as well.
 
140095

I was talking about martial arts, and your suggestions would not be allowed. Even if they could be handly in a street fight situation.
And cross sex training in the ring happens, under very strict and controlled forms, as fighting a guy that can knock you out with a single punch (or even kill you) needs to have restrictions.
 
140096

Ah, surely in controlled sparring environments this wouldn't be fair. I was thinking more of encounters in the streets - there's not really a "forbidden" thing, just "morally acceptable" things which might vary.

In martial arts it's unusual to hold things in the air without actually expecting you to kick, hit or grab those or either using it to hit you with it or protect themself, but in that case the most promising way to actually reach it would be either a throw or removal of their stable stance (as such: they fall) with one of the allowed movements. Sitting on the ground it's hard to reach out farther than a standing (smaller) human could reach. (y)

Alternatively a fake attack which results in them taking a defensive stance which nears the object to your reach. :unsure:
 
140997

In a street fight situation, I would try to run away, or hide behind the huge "monster" I usually have in my proximity when I am in locations and hour of the day street fights usually happens.

In MMA and similar, making them fall to the ground is a very good strategy. Same ish weight, so longer limbs actually becomes a disadvantages when your opponent is on top of you.
No wrestling allowed in the martial art that was my cup of tea, so close combat was my only strategy when fighting taller opponents.
 
140098

MrsShemon said:
No wrestling allowed in the martial art that was my cup of tea, so close combat was my only strategy when fighting taller opponents.
Click to expand...

Ah, that's understandable. A good thing is to take their unleashed energy and direct into a direction which doesn't give them the room and stance to reduce their movement energy without falling down or jumping up (a small movement is enough to turn someone in the air).

But from my experience this gets harder and harder the nearer you are to them. I usually don't run and hide, just take one of several self-made toys and activate it, leaving them bamboozled enough to mostly forget about their initial plans.

At the moment working on a small curled up stainless steel whip with a flexible stainless steel chapter "tube" which gets filled by butane / propane and piezo-lighted, while having around 80 "exits" which eject small, but hot jet flames all over the length. To this point it's weighting 720g and 7 feet long. People don't really expect such toys and most don't want to experience them. :ROFLMAO:

(I have two end extensions made from 4,5mm stainless steel wire, which both possess 3 pieces of TIG welded 3 mm thick carp fishing hooks with counterhooks as their end and are screw-on. As such: if it hits a living being, it's very hard to distance from the whip.)
 
140099

You get more points by unleashing combos after combos compared to trying to make someone with a huge control of their body and extremely good balance lose that balance.
Hence ->
Bigger one, run in while blocking, knee jump kick, stay close and pummel, the round only last a couple of minutes after all.

I can imagine most would back off when someone pulls a lightsaber radiating lightning like a Tessla coil and starts swinging it in their direction.
 
140100

MrsShemon said:
I can imagine most would back off when someone pulls a lightsaber radiating lightning like a Tessla coil and starts swinging it in their direction.
Click to expand...

That's a good idea. Unfortunately acetylene is hard to carry in a small bottle, as it is self-combusting even inside the bottle if not kept under pressure liquidized in acetone as example. :unsure:

Had one encounter with some aggressive biker type, which actually started to swing their knife in my direction and coming towards me. I didn't even have any motivation to stay at this place, nor to continue the fight. But sometimes they are braindead enough with their "I'LL KILL YOU!" bullshit, while the whole reason for dissonance was that they are drunk and I am walking without caring for them (due to music in my ears) and neither reacting to them. People shouldn't drink more than they can keep their brain function in balance with.
 
140105

Thank you - it's acceptable, which is something! (y)

Won't and can't tell you guys everything that happened - as such all that proves helpful is to keep going on. "Life happens."

Everyone has quite unhappy and permanent results in their life, but good days come along and that's the most important thing. Working on what lets some sunshine appear. *fuses another plutonium reactor together* (Joke)
 
140108

Hello there! 👋

My evening thoughts: It's really a surprise to see someone such well-prepared and thoughtful like him:

Need help understanding my gf's dog

My gf has a two year old, intact bulldog mix. Whenever we are making out or are getting sexual in any way, he comes over to us, wagging his tail, trying to be close to us. When one of us takes our pants off, he immediately tries to lick cock, balls, pussy or ass. Sometimes, when he is licking...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net

But unfortunately I don't know much ways to actually "raise the active participation of a male dog", as this never was a goal of me. Most were and are quite happy to show their affection themself and love to get stimulation (by hands). 🤷‍♂️ As such the "tricks" of people which let male dogs copulate with themself all the time are not in my repetoirée. :ROFLMAO:
 
140112

Daneζ said:
My day is slow going as I’ve only been up for about an hour now. Gotta go do stuff and things soon tho. How is our elusive floofster?
Click to expand...

Oh, the time shift is immense. Probably like 13-14 hours? Here it is right now 23:45 ~, as such a quarter hour until midnight.

Daneζ said:
Do you know many fat Danes?
Click to expand...

*Laughs in black tea* :ROFLMAO: That's not what I thought about - more in regards of you feeling healthy and happy, not related to body fat!

How's the floofster.. That's a good question, thanks for asking. ❤️
Acceptable, but there's .. ah, just imagine a consuming void of unavoidable results which tore existence itself. There's always loss, hm?
And I'm not respecting lying, as such I wouldn't write "all is perfect". But don't worry. 🦊 🐾
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top