Agnostic atheism for me.
The agnostic part says that I can't prove my point as the existence or non-existence of deities are unprovable by nature and I should always be open to new knowledge.
The atheist part says that it's far more probable that no deity exists than that a deity, even more so a very specific one exists.
So I'm free from faith and wishful thinking, I prefer to know stuff. Obviously the world isn't entirely filled with facts and theories (scientific or otherwise) are fine as well. I aknowledge them. When it comes to stuff I can't know, I love to speculate, but in the end, if something just seems way to unlikely, it usually does so for a reason.
Also, reason and skepticism is always something I admire. And I don't mean conspiracy theorist skepticism, just the regular kind that makes one think.
As I made clear I don't believe in a creator, therefore I also don't believe in any kind of creation myth. We might not have all the answers to life, the universe and everything (yet), but that doesn't mean that the answer should be the ever so popular "a (sky)wizard did it" placeholder.
And since I don't believe in a creator I also don't believe in a specific reason to be here. We just are, we should make the best of it anyway, since we only live once.
Also I don't ascribe a greater or smaller value to animals than to humans. To me, we are equal in our right to be here. Most animals aren't in any way shape or form less cognisant than we are, they perceive their surrounding through their senses as we do. We just have the ability to communicate our ideas and no way to communicate complex ideas outside our own species. That doesn't make animals less valuable. And it doesn't make humans more valuable. Every lifeform (before emotions get involved) is equally valuable to me, that doesn't take anything away from humans though, because I value a lifeform that is alive way more than most non-living things in the world, so it doesn't really matter what species it is, it's already of (high) value.