• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:

  • Total voters
    1,871
dartel said:
Mods have repeatedly said the watermark on videos is fine, just no direct clickable links to it.
Click to expand...
It's worth saying though. But correct it's my opinion in this regard. Anything leading back there is advertising in that respect.

If they could cut out the watermark I would say it's more ethical. But yeah "mainstream commercial" content is abusive regularly
 
Reconscope said:
It's worth saying though. But correct it's my opinion in this regard. Anything leading back there is advertising in that respect.
Click to expand...
Only if you're psychotic enough to type in an address you saw on a video/image. Even 25 years ago when I was a stupid teen viewing porn on aol dialup I wasn't dumb enough to trust some watermark link to be safe to navigate to.
 
Can someone review this please?
It is very likely the same commercial crap that has been reported in the same thread before. My tor browser can not play it though.
Look for the usual signs of horse porn crap.
Limp dick sucking, no flare, no/fake cumshot, bound legs, bound head, mare in front, limp dick shoved into various body orifices, no real erection, no humps, no excitement.
 
pes said:
Can someone review this please?
It is very likely the same commercial crap that has been reported in the same thread before. My tor browser can not play it though.
Look for the usual signs of horse porn crap.
Limp dick sucking, no flare, no/fake cumshot, bound legs, bound head, mare in front, limp dick shoved into various body orifices, no real erection, no humps, no excitement.
Click to expand...
Grrr, I hope I didn't get fleas after the trip to that place.
So many pop-up and adds probably a few viruses and malware chucked in for good luck I feel so dirty.

Oh and as for the horse I think he had an errection by accident at one point because the 8 minutes of masturbating in front of him obviously wasn't a turn on for him, and you don't need to use two hand to try and get a stallion inside a vagina, if the horse has any sort of regidity to the shaft. just how soft he was, was very obvious when she was sucking on him. I can't tell you if the cum was yoghurt or condensed milk because their were links covering the scroll bar that I wasn't going click on if you paid me. And I wasn't going to sit through another 15 minute or whatever to the end. But if she managed to get more than 2 drops of precum out that stallion I would be incredibly amazed. The camera cut to some other horses watching the "action" from their stalls, but during the sex you never saw the head of the stallion involved, so chances are very high he was being held still.

In short I would consider it crappy commercial porn with no consideration of the horses enjoyment for the act. I have taken screen shots at various places if mods want to see them, but thought better than posting them here.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
pes said:
View attachment 285702
@Dirk087 @dogfan50 https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/dirty-rimming-human-female-by-male-animal.58291/

Another Asian abuse. This time showing that the actresses are forced into porn just like the animals.
This is scat porn and the actress is gagging. So anyone who liked this does not absolutely mind watching a woman being forced into some literal abusive shit.

Identifier:
View attachment 285701
Click to expand...
Isn't that the basis of this kind of japan kink?
 
 
dogfan50 said:
Perhaps she is a PAID actress, and it is part of the script to perform that way. You don't know.
Click to expand...
So you believe a person who is into a kink would be visibly disgusted by it and would not enjoy it. The disgust was not fake just like her complete lack of skill in any of the other videos. These people have by far not the amount of skill to be able to act that well.
You are just trying to find an excuse.
 
Hey just wanted to check and see if anyone else is having trouble with getting notifications for things you report. Up until a couple of weeks ago I would receive a notification for every report submitted, whether it was a correctly or incorrectly reported item. Now, even when I am reporting on absolute rule breaks, my notification response rate is only around %40 if that. Any ideas?
 
Mikedncn said:
Hey just wanted to check and see if anyone else is having trouble with getting notifications for things you report. Up until a couple of weeks ago I would receive a notification for every report submitted, whether it was a correctly or incorrectly reported item. Now, even when I am reporting on absolute rule breaks, my notification response rate is only around %40 if that. Any ideas?
Click to expand...
For what I know, In most forums feedback to reporting user is not a function, but up to the mod to leave a note or explanation in goodwill.

Possibly depends on the mod dealing with the issue or the workload, but sure. Feedback is always appreciated and helps knowing what is to be reported ?
 
Goattobeloved said:
For what I know, In most forums feedback to reporting user is not a function, but up to the mod to leave a note or explanation in goodwill.

Possibly depends on the mod dealing with the issue or the workload, but sure. Feedback is always appreciated and helps knowing what is to be reported ?
Click to expand...
Oh that would make sense. I was mostly bringing it up because I wasn't sure if it was a mod function or a system function, and if it were system I thought it should be known. But thank you
 
Mikedncn said:
Hey just wanted to check and see if anyone else is having trouble with getting notifications for things you report. Up until a couple of weeks ago I would receive a notification for every report submitted, whether it was a correctly or incorrectly reported item. Now, even when I am reporting on absolute rule breaks, my notification response rate is only around %40 if that. Any ideas?
Click to expand...
HugDoggy said:
I've had a similar issue, I know the report was acted on as the clips were removed, but didn't see any message as I have gotten in the past.
Click to expand...
It depends on who handles the report. When a moderator handles a report they have to click on either "Resolved" or "Rejected" when closing out the report. If resolved/rejected is pushed there's also a checkmark box underneath that which states "Send resolution/rejection alert:" when checkmarked it activates a text box which allows us to type an alert message to send to the reporter. If "Send resolution/rejection alert:" isn't checkmarked, the reporter won't receive a notification.

I typically key in a short response, and almost always thank the reporter when I handle a report. Such as, "Deleted post, thanks." or "Deleted thread, thanks." or "Deleted and given a warning, thanks." or "Edited their post and gave them a warning, thanks." Etc... Not all mods with bother doing this though, and will just close out the report.
 
Mikedncn said:
Ok, thanks floof. I'm just going to start bookmarking anything I report so I can check back later to keep up with it. Appreciate the help!
Click to expand...
What do you think is the secondary purpose of this thread? :D I do not usually get notifications, so this holds the links for easy checking.
It has even more uses. :D Sometimes a mod rejects a report usually the mods you do not see online often do that (even though it happens rarely) but some other mod sees the public report here and decides that it is actually a good idea to remove the thread.
It is also maybe a little persuasion tool. Since the report is public not acting on it might look bad in some of the worse cases making the mods (at least those more benevolent) maybe rethink their decision. I heard a few years back, removing content was not going so smoothly.

Of course the main purpose is education, connecting idiots to their abusive posts forever and providing history and identification for repeated posts of the same crap.
 
pes said:
What do you think is the secondary purpose of this thread? :D I do not usually get notifications, so this holds the links for easy checking.
It has even more uses. :D Sometimes a mod rejects a report usually the mods you do not see online often do that (even though it happens rarely) but some other mod sees the public report here and decides that it is actually a good idea to remove the thread.
It is also maybe a little persuasion tool. Since the report is public not acting on it might look bad in some of the worse cases making the mods (at least those more benevolent) maybe rethink their decision. I heard a few years back, removing content was not going so smoothly.

Of course the main purpose is education, connecting idiots to their abusive posts forever and providing history and identification for repeated posts of the same crap.
Click to expand...
Lol, I check here as well, I guess I thought it was implied since I wrote it here. But I do appreciate the help sir!
 
pes said:
Of course the main purpose is education, connecting idiots to their abusive posts forever
Click to expand...
By mentioning them and the quoting them in the report giving them the ability to respond (which basically does not happen) and learn (which maybe happens but mostly in the way they stop posting it here and learn nothing useful).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top