• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:

  • Total voters
    1,674
jonesd1000 said:
In this instance they didnt tell the model exactly who she was goig to work with.
The look on her face of shock and intrigue when the brought the dogs in.
Click to expand...

Another example of Asian animal abuse. Same producer as before. This video is a shortened cut of a longer version.
In the long version the dogs are held in place by two guys, both have choke collars, they use bait for licking, use the dogs as sex toys, tons of dildogging, limp sucking, disgusting nonzoo actress. All the usual commercial crap.

No wonder the OP had to cut it. Fortunately in this case that is not enough.

Identifier:
427.png878.png
 
Last edited:
pes said:
The long version of this unwatchable disgusting crap can be found by searching for
Click to expand...
Is it wise to say where to find the full version, on a site where it will no doubt still be available? I get that it might be useful for a mod reference if the clip here is only questionable, but I have no doubt some people lurk this thread to find the very stuff, we are trying to stop from being spread on ZV and whatever tiny trickle effect elsewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
HugDoggy said:
Is it wise to say where to find the full version, on a site where it will no doubt still be available? I get that it might be useful for a mod reference if the clip here is only questionable, but I have no doubt some people lurk this thread to find the very stuff, we are trying to stop from being spread on ZV and whatever tiny trickle effect elsewhere.
Click to expand...
It's going to be found regardless whether we say anything or not. However yes it's best to censor any probable sources into more misuse handling of animals
 
dartel said:
Mods have repeatedly said the watermark on videos is fine, just no direct clickable links to it.
Click to expand...
It's worth saying though. But correct it's my opinion in this regard. Anything leading back there is advertising in that respect.

If they could cut out the watermark I would say it's more ethical. But yeah "mainstream commercial" content is abusive regularly
 
Reconscope said:
It's worth saying though. But correct it's my opinion in this regard. Anything leading back there is advertising in that respect.
Click to expand...
Only if you're psychotic enough to type in an address you saw on a video/image. Even 25 years ago when I was a stupid teen viewing porn on aol dialup I wasn't dumb enough to trust some watermark link to be safe to navigate to.
 
Can someone review this please?
It is very likely the same commercial crap that has been reported in the same thread before. My tor browser can not play it though.
Look for the usual signs of horse porn crap.
Limp dick sucking, no flare, no/fake cumshot, bound legs, bound head, mare in front, limp dick shoved into various body orifices, no real erection, no humps, no excitement.
 
pes said:
Can someone review this please?
It is very likely the same commercial crap that has been reported in the same thread before. My tor browser can not play it though.
Look for the usual signs of horse porn crap.
Limp dick sucking, no flare, no/fake cumshot, bound legs, bound head, mare in front, limp dick shoved into various body orifices, no real erection, no humps, no excitement.
Click to expand...
Grrr, I hope I didn't get fleas after the trip to that place.
So many pop-up and adds probably a few viruses and malware chucked in for good luck I feel so dirty.

Oh and as for the horse I think he had an errection by accident at one point because the 8 minutes of masturbating in front of him obviously wasn't a turn on for him, and you don't need to use two hand to try and get a stallion inside a vagina, if the horse has any sort of regidity to the shaft. just how soft he was, was very obvious when she was sucking on him. I can't tell you if the cum was yoghurt or condensed milk because their were links covering the scroll bar that I wasn't going click on if you paid me. And I wasn't going to sit through another 15 minute or whatever to the end. But if she managed to get more than 2 drops of precum out that stallion I would be incredibly amazed. The camera cut to some other horses watching the "action" from their stalls, but during the sex you never saw the head of the stallion involved, so chances are very high he was being held still.

In short I would consider it crappy commercial porn with no consideration of the horses enjoyment for the act. I have taken screen shots at various places if mods want to see them, but thought better than posting them here.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
pes said:
View attachment 285702
@Dirk087 @dogfan50 https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/dirty-rimming-human-female-by-male-animal.58291/

Another Asian abuse. This time showing that the actresses are forced into porn just like the animals.
This is scat porn and the actress is gagging. So anyone who liked this does not absolutely mind watching a woman being forced into some literal abusive shit.

Identifier:
View attachment 285701
Click to expand...
Isn't that the basis of this kind of japan kink?
 
 
dogfan50 said:
Perhaps she is a PAID actress, and it is part of the script to perform that way. You don't know.
Click to expand...
So you believe a person who is into a kink would be visibly disgusted by it and would not enjoy it. The disgust was not fake just like her complete lack of skill in any of the other videos. These people have by far not the amount of skill to be able to act that well.
You are just trying to find an excuse.
 
Hey just wanted to check and see if anyone else is having trouble with getting notifications for things you report. Up until a couple of weeks ago I would receive a notification for every report submitted, whether it was a correctly or incorrectly reported item. Now, even when I am reporting on absolute rule breaks, my notification response rate is only around %40 if that. Any ideas?
 
Mikedncn said:
Hey just wanted to check and see if anyone else is having trouble with getting notifications for things you report. Up until a couple of weeks ago I would receive a notification for every report submitted, whether it was a correctly or incorrectly reported item. Now, even when I am reporting on absolute rule breaks, my notification response rate is only around %40 if that. Any ideas?
Click to expand...
For what I know, In most forums feedback to reporting user is not a function, but up to the mod to leave a note or explanation in goodwill.

Possibly depends on the mod dealing with the issue or the workload, but sure. Feedback is always appreciated and helps knowing what is to be reported ?
 
Goattobeloved said:
For what I know, In most forums feedback to reporting user is not a function, but up to the mod to leave a note or explanation in goodwill.

Possibly depends on the mod dealing with the issue or the workload, but sure. Feedback is always appreciated and helps knowing what is to be reported ?
Click to expand...
Oh that would make sense. I was mostly bringing it up because I wasn't sure if it was a mod function or a system function, and if it were system I thought it should be known. But thank you
 
Mikedncn said:
Hey just wanted to check and see if anyone else is having trouble with getting notifications for things you report. Up until a couple of weeks ago I would receive a notification for every report submitted, whether it was a correctly or incorrectly reported item. Now, even when I am reporting on absolute rule breaks, my notification response rate is only around %40 if that. Any ideas?
Click to expand...
HugDoggy said:
I've had a similar issue, I know the report was acted on as the clips were removed, but didn't see any message as I have gotten in the past.
Click to expand...
It depends on who handles the report. When a moderator handles a report they have to click on either "Resolved" or "Rejected" when closing out the report. If resolved/rejected is pushed there's also a checkmark box underneath that which states "Send resolution/rejection alert:" when checkmarked it activates a text box which allows us to type an alert message to send to the reporter. If "Send resolution/rejection alert:" isn't checkmarked, the reporter won't receive a notification.

I typically key in a short response, and almost always thank the reporter when I handle a report. Such as, "Deleted post, thanks." or "Deleted thread, thanks." or "Deleted and given a warning, thanks." or "Edited their post and gave them a warning, thanks." Etc... Not all mods with bother doing this though, and will just close out the report.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top