• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:


  • Total voters
    1,674
That one has been reported a couple of times, and usually it's rejected due to the premise that the female dog seems to really be enjoying herself in the video, and is behaving like a typical receptive female dog in heat. But there is a couple of gray aspects to the video, such as the guy lifting her up, the fact that she has a leash on (not sure if it's attached to anything or just loose), and the fact that during one of the times the guy dismounted she wasn't allowed to spin and clean herself. But overall, the canine appears to be enjoying herself.

So it sits in the sort of "gray" category.

That's understandable, I was concerned by a few points:
1. The leash has tension on it at multiple points, which means she's definitely tied to something and is being hindered by it.
2. Obviously as you mentioned her being held and lifted up
3. There's some yawning and lip licking in the video which is generally a sign of stress and/or discomfort. Context matters of course but I feel like when you combine that with her trying to leave at several points it's a bad sign.

Edit: I make no attempt to claim she's being forced entirely to participate, the video doesn't seem to suggest that, but my main point is it seems unethical for her to be forced to stay in place and not leave/return as she pleases.
 
That one has been reported a couple of times, and usually it's rejected due to the premise that the female dog seems to really be enjoying herself in the video, and is behaving like a typical receptive female dog in heat. But there is a couple of gray aspects to the video, such as the guy lifting her up, the fact that she has a leash on (not sure if it's attached to anything or just loose), and the fact that during one of the times the guy dismounted she wasn't allowed to spin and clean herself. But overall, the canine appears to be enjoying herself.

So it sits in the sort of "gray" category.
I agree, she's definitely enjoying herself from what I see and not really restricted in her movement, a bit of a grey area with being picked up but I've had one that didn't mind at all.
 
Just a susden idea for improvement.

I was seeing a thread where soneone asked if there was sonething better and @pes just handled them a number of "better video threads"

So, my suggestion... Maybe, once a thread is "cleaned" and mostly decently viewable videos, you could add a known tag like "reviewed" or something similar.

That way:
1 - People knows it is mostly trash free. I mean even not-thst-bad things, like fake cum are still a total downer :D
2 - it will let people reviewing videos that thread was mostly reviewed already and work on another
 
Just a susden idea for improvement.

I was seeing a thread where soneone asked if there was sonething better and @pes just handled them a number of "better video threads"

So, my suggestion... Maybe, once a thread is "cleaned" and mostly decently viewable videos, you could add a known tag like "reviewed" or something similar.

That way:
1 - People knows it is mostly trash free. I mean even not-thst-bad things, like fake cum are still a total downer :D
2 - it will let people reviewing videos that thread was mostly reviewed already and work on another
I was considering something like this, the problem is that as long as a thread is open for replies, new content can be added that would invalidate the reviewed tag. The forum does not have any convenient system for systematic reviewing unfortunately.
 
In theory it could be done with some of the smaller threads with a single poster, the large ones that have multiple posters resharing who knows what would take a good amount of time to review and approve.
 
I do systematic thread reviewing currently in the FM dog section while keeping an eye on the other smaller sections. Bu I had to skip the fast moving threads for now since they jump around too much. So currently I am cleaning the older stuff. While the newly posted content get caught by other people or me since it pops up in the new posts.
Either way there is so much stuff there that it is going to take me 4 years to go through all of it. :D

I am going from page 1 ->, and earlier before I became a mod I went from the other side, so from the back the section is clean up to about page 33.
If someone wants to help out and not re-review the stuff I went through start on page 33 and go towards 1.

By the way including the deleted stuff the section has 112 pages. :D
 
I was considering something like this, the problem is that as long as a thread is open for replies, new content can be added that would invalidate the reviewed tag. The forum does not have any convenient system for systematic reviewing unfortunately.
Yes, I was thinking about that too.

(Also, someone autotagging his thread so it looks like reviewed ?)

Tag with date would make searching for it difficult.
Pointer post in the thread would give up who was reviewing it which does not need to be known to users...
 
how about a little "clean" or "reviewed" line on each post with content? i mean, it's not like you're not clicking every single one of them already....
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
I was considering something like this, the problem is that as long as a thread is open for replies, new content can be added that would invalidate the reviewed tag. The forum does not have any convenient system for systematic reviewing unfortunately.
Could not a tag contain a date or page number so you can tell when, or which pages have been reviewed?
 
Hey can anyone check out this thread and possibly help before it turns bad?
I couldn't find anything in the search that might be relevant
 
I am not sure whether the things I noticed are severe enough, so if the canine experts could double-check then that would be great.

First one is https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/wife-and-dog.19908/ At 0.45, she pushes dog's head in her crotch. Skip a bit further to 2.18 (and onward), and I got the impression that the dog wasn't very much enthusiastically involved,and that she moves him back and forwards at the chest to simulate any thrusting. At 2.42 she has moved her hands to his head, so I wondered whether here she actually was thrusting him by pulling and pushing his head

The second one is https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/another-bj.20066/ From 0.12-0.31 the dog tries to lick himself, but she doesn't let him. From At 1.14 I noticed a stretched leash on the left of the screen, so was the dog basically tied up?

Finally there is https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/a-classic-she-loves-to-suck-see-comments-for-long-version.383/
At the start of the video in the first post it seems that there is no erection, just the penile bone. From 0.15 on, she pushes the dog's head away a couple of times, following by pushing the leg at 1.06. Then the longer clip (post 19) shows a limp penis at 2.23, which might just be foreplay. At 3.10 she needs to tell the dog to stay, but at 3.28 you can see some active thrusting. What bothered me though was at 6.30 the dog being on his back, while she decides to squat over him for penetration.
 
Thank you for bringing these to everyone's attention. You can also "report" these and mods will get 2 notices (here and a report), I highly suggest that method
 
First one is https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/wife-and-dog.19908/ At 0.45, she pushes dog's head in her crotch. Skip a bit further to 2.18 (and onward), and I got the impression that the dog wasn't very much enthusiastically involved,and that she moves him back and forwards at the chest to simulate any thrusting. At 2.42 she has moved her hands to his head, so I wondered whether here she actually was thrusting him by pulling and pushing his head
Deleted, thanks.

The second one is https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/another-bj.20066/ From 0.12-0.31 the dog tries to lick himself, but she doesn't let him. From At 1.14 I noticed a stretched leash on the left of the screen, so was the dog basically tied up?
Deleted. Definitely an incompetent and careless moron. She is ignoring the dog's attempts to get away, lick himself, turn around and holds his leg down.
39 likes and praising comments, 2020

1st video. Leg held down, completely incompetent sucking, ignoring his licking attempts.
59 likes. 2019
2nd video. Limp dick sucking, taking advantage of the penis bone, dildogging. The dog is soft most of the video.
Deleted. Thanks.
 
@wishful_thinking
Almost anywhere you click in this 1h long video it is fake cum or commercial crap porn with animals held in place.
Removed.
 
Does anyone recognize or know who these Asian Woman are? Perhaps have any more videos on them? I have a few videos.
Video 4,5 have been removed many times in the past. Asian zoo porn is almost exclusively animal abuse or close to it.
Video 4: dog held on his back until he finally escapes, incompetent penis rubbing, literally no idea how to jerk a dog off.
Video 5: same dog held on his back despite several attempts to get up, no skill, literally no idea how to jerk a dog off. Disgusting non-zoo actress literally disgusted by what she is doing.
 
this thread is based af

ty to all the reporters here

@pes i found that addon i mentioned that autoreports posts and comments that contain censored words, you can configure censors to not actually change the word and use this as a sort of automated search and report, flagging words you feel are often associated with content that may endorse or display abuse i.e. dildogging, teen, puppy or known actress names. Or words/phrases that are possible correlations like japanese, russian dildo, or 'stunning blonde/brunette/milf/wife'.


might improve mods quality of life depending at least a little less on the underused report button and certainly beats manual sifting through each new post and comment.

or it might just be more burden on yall

in any case theres the resource lol
 
this thread is based af

ty to all the reporters here

@pes i found that addon i mentioned that autoreports posts and comments that contain censored words, you can configure censors to not actually change the word and use this as a sort of automated search and report, flagging words you feel are often associated with content that may endorse or display abuse i.e. dildogging, teen, puppy or known actress names. Or words/phrases that are possible correlations like japanese, russian dildo, or 'stunning blonde/brunette/milf/wife'.


might improve mods quality of life depending at least a little less on the underused report button and certainly beats manual sifting through each new post and comment.

or it might just be more burden on yall

in any case theres the resource lol
Thanks. Only admins can install additional software and maybe even only they can use some features.
Things like this have to go through the administrator staff. @ZTHorse
 
I did a Ctrl + F search in the community rules for bait and licking, and I didn't come up with any rule against using bait in porn. I understand that we both wouldn't do that with our own animals, but we would need to have a community agreed rule to remove those. I think it falls into the category of "not harmful".
There is not an explicit rule against this, but a strong history of content like that being removed by other mods as well.
It falls under the category of forcing an animal to do sexual stuff to you. In this case tricking the animal into it.
It is a dishonest and disingenuous practice that does not respect the animal's sexual desires or the lack off and therefore I and other mods remove that.
 
In that case, I suggest we make it official with a poll asking people their thoughts and then have it added to the rules if supported. I believe that dogs will lick for the taste without it being sexual whether bait is used or not. The dog may or may not have sexual feelings even in baitless porn.
Make the poll then and once it has finished you may mention the mods and ask for reconsideration.
The majority of the forum is made of fetishists, so you are very likely going to get high support for not removing baiting.
 
I did a Ctrl + F search in the community rules for bait and licking, and I didn't come up with any rule against using bait in porn. I understand that we both wouldn't do that with our own animals, but we would need to have a community agreed rule to remove those. I think it falls into the category of "not harmful".
its using the reward training method to reinforce behavior that wasnt happening previously. its what everyone out there thinks all zoophiles are, dog rapists.
 
Back
Top