• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:

  • Total voters
    1,870
pes said:
Include the quote in the reports if possible as evidence, otherwise the op can change or remove it.
Add the thread where it is posted as well. Basically as much information as you can.
Click to expand...
He tried to edit it. At least he didn't figure out the "can delete history" which I hate, and was ignored when I said to disable their ability to do that.
 
pes said:
Include the quote in the reports if possible as evidence, otherwise the op can change or remove it.
Add the thread where it is posted as well. Basically as much information as you can.
Click to expand...
I took screenshots just in case that happened because I am on my phone
 
Ok thank you. I know how to do it on pc, but my mobile browser makes the site look different, so I just did a quick screenshot in case he was able to change it before I figured out technology lol
 
pes said:
Include the quote in the reports if possible as evidence, otherwise the op can change or remove it.
Add the thread where it is posted as well. Basically as much information as you can.
Click to expand...
Mods can see post edits.
 
pes said:
If it is, that kind of porn does not belong here.
Click to expand...


Semi hard, not interested horses, dogs being used as dildos, or letting their cocks get dry while some dipshit is trying to blow the dogs' front portion of his shaft, which if there is real scene related audio, you'd no doubt hear the whimpers of pain from the dog. None of these commercial vids have any active animals, let alone the people involved being zoos. The commercial garbage for the most part, use animals as a fetish/kink like a fucking dildo, with NO love for the welfare of the animal. A classic example is the black great dane, sometimes referred to as Hector. That poor boy is starved(look at his ribs showing, along with his spine. That's not show quality, that's lack of food and/or poor health), and manhandled just to make a lame video.

The sooner these types of videos are removed, the better this forum will be. And, there won't be any bad ideas for those new to being a zoo, that won't harm their four legged friends.
 
Last edited:
Enigma214 said:
Semi hard, not interested horses, dogs being used as dildos, or letting their cocks get dry while some dipshit is trying to blow the dogs' front portion of his shaft, which if there is real scene related audio, you'd no doubt hear the whimpers of pain from the dog. None of these commercial vids have any active animals, let alone the people involved being zoos. The commercial garbage for the most part, use animals as a fetish/kink like a fucking dildo, with NO love for the welfare of the animal. A classic example is the black great dane, sometimes referred to as Hector. That poor boy is starved(look at his ribs showing, along with his spine. That's not show quality, that's lack of food and/or poor health), and manhandled just to make a lame video.

The sooner these types of videos are removed, the better this forum will be. And, there won't be any bad ideas for those new to being a zoo, that won't harm their four legged friends.
Click to expand...
it's kinda refreshing to see someone mentioning Hector without going "his dick was the biggest ever" or "great danes totally have the biggest tools" myth the content featuring him created. i also doubt the average viewer of such cares how he looked besides his penis which is fucking sad if you think about it.

i personally wouldn't mind if everything even remotely resembling a commercial production was banned here even if it ment losing some of the more tame ones like stuff from petlust. tho i do have some reservations about some of their content. the girls look drugged in some of the m/fdog category vids and Divan the dane (at least i think that's what the brindle one was called) looks drugged in all vids featuring him.
 
dartel said:
Mods can see post edits.
Click to expand...
Yes but we can not. So the OP could argue with us here that he did not say that until a mod comes in and if a mod comes in. If you quote the original post, there is no space for claiming you did not say that.
 
Yes, Hector... I remember him when I started looking for online porn.

He WAS spectacular in size, so yes, one tent to look there in awe. The part about being thin, well, some danes are natural thin even when cared. I can buy that.

On the rest, yes. The abuse was obvious. Overused, dildogging, just lying apatically in there... A very sad live for him indeed.

On petlust, I basically respect the production. Zoos in there and mostly look good. It was really a nice surprise when I started finding them among the commecial stuff.
The only thing that hit me straight in the face was a photo of one on the dogs with holes in the neck from an spike choke collar. I mean... Maybe the dog needed it? Maybe he pulled hard by surprise and got hurt? Well, *may* happen if you use such atrocious devices. BUT do not have him in a production until he looks well. Shesh!
 
There was some shady business around petlust too. I heard it from someone a while ago but can not remember what exactly it was. But as long as you are producing content for money and you have paying customers who expect their content delivered, the potential for abuse goes very high.
Petlust had videos with snakes. It may have been a large snake, but cloacal penetration is extremely dangerous for snakes and the snake looked like an oversized garden hose the whole time, there was literally no way to tell what the animal felt.

Sex with reptiles/snakes FAQ

There is this interesting article that explains why having sex with reptiles is not a good idea and harmful for the animals most of the time. While this topic does not appear often I thought this might be useful to have here: http://www.subgenius.com/bigfist/hallscience/X0086_ScalySexFAQ.html...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net
 
nekdoneco123 said:
it's kinda refreshing to see someone mentioning Hector without going "his dick was the biggest ever" or "great danes totally have the biggest tools" myth the content featuring him created. i also doubt the average viewer of such cares how he looked besides his penis which is fucking sad if you think about it.

i personally wouldn't mind if everything even remotely resembling a commercial production was banned here even if it ment losing some of the more tame ones like stuff from petlust. tho i do have some reservations about some of their content. the girls look drugged in some of the m/fdog category vids and Divan the dane (at least i think that's what the brindle one was called) looks drugged in all vids featuring him.
Click to expand...
I have mixed feeling about Petlust stuff, some of it looks fine, but then other times I start to wonder about a few things, where I'm just not sure I know how willing the animal really is.

Banning all commercial porn is possibly a extreme measure, but given how little of it that I've seen which I have no concerns with, it might be an effective way to solve a lot of the problems with the porn here. But if it was banned it might kill off a lot of traffic to this site, now don't get me wrong here, I absolutely don't want abusive stuff on this site, but while people are coming here for their porn we can just possibly bash some tiny amount of education about how to handle animals properly into their heads. Because they sure as fuck aren't getting that at any of the other animal porn sites out there.
 
And zooville is sponsored by a commercial zoo porn producer. And from what I have seen this producer learned little from the past - dildogging, human like sucking and generally common porn behavior. I have not seen any abuse worth reporting but that is maybe because I have only seen maybe two videos from veronica hot zone or whatever the name is.
 
@CBYJ55
CBYJ55 said:
ASIAN BESTIALITY PORN - Japanese and Chinese Girls FUCK ANIMALS
Size: 5062297741 bytes (50.06 GB), duration: 00:13:44, avg.bitrate: 10314 kb/s
Audio: aac, 44100 Hz, stereo (eng)
Video: h264, yuv420p, 1920x1080, 25.00 fps(r) (eng)
Click to expand...
This is known animal abuse. Clearly you can not tell the difference. Let alone the rest of your threads many of which link to other commercial crap which is also animal abuse. Including bound horses, fake cum and pretty much any type of animal abuse that has been reported in this thread in the past few years.

CBYJ55 said:
Team Russia Petlove collection
Size: 58488272787 bytes (58.69 GB), duration: 18:55:10, avg.bitrate: 1616 kb/s
Audio: aac, 44100 Hz, stereo (und)
Video: h264, yuv420p, 852x478, 23.98 fps(r) (und)
Click to expand...
Team russia is banned for cp.
 
Last edited:
@UnclearObjective
UnclearObjective said:
I am very new to this and also my first post here. This is from a long video that I cut down. Her "Name" is Paola from what I understand. Love her interaction with the camera and her smile. Quite an older clip from what I can tell but thought I would share.
Click to expand...

Commercial crap again in the horse section. It is almost like there is almost nothing else to post there. :D
00:00 head bound.
No real erection in the entire video, no flare, no humps, no cumshot, no excitement, no skill nonzoo actress, limp dick shoving. All the usual contents of crap commercial zoo porn.
 
pes said:
First video. That might be a puppy, what do you think?
Click to expand...
So I couldn't say for sure, but a few things would suggest it is a puppy:
The way the ears sit; it is common in a lot of pointy eared breeds for the ears to not be very erect when quite young.
The way the paws look and move at one point seems slightly um-coordinated, again a trait more common in puppies than adult dogs.
When the woman pushes the dog back, panicked sounds are heard for a second like the dog thinks he might be falling of the bed, which would be unusual for an adult dog who would just clamber forward without the worried noices.

This is circumstancial, and only my opinion, but I would say the odds of this being a puppy is more likely than not to my eye.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
gsdmixg said:
First video. Dog is tied to something off camera by the collar and being held in place.
Click to expand...
That one has been reported a couple of times, and usually it's rejected due to the premise that the female dog seems to really be enjoying herself in the video, and is behaving like a typical receptive female dog in heat. But there is a couple of gray aspects to the video, such as the guy lifting her up, the fact that she has a leash on (not sure if it's attached to anything or just loose), and the fact that during one of the times the guy dismounted she wasn't allowed to spin and clean herself. But overall, the canine appears to be enjoying herself.

So it sits in the sort of "gray" category.
 
FloofyNewfie said:
That one has been reported a couple of times, and usually it's rejected due to the premise that the female dog seems to really be enjoying herself in the video, and is behaving like a typical receptive female dog in heat. But there is a couple of gray aspects to the video, such as the guy lifting her up, the fact that she has a leash on (not sure if it's attached to anything or just loose), and the fact that during one of the times the guy dismounted she wasn't allowed to spin and clean herself. But overall, the canine appears to be enjoying herself.

So it sits in the sort of "gray" category.
Click to expand...

That's understandable, I was concerned by a few points:
1. The leash has tension on it at multiple points, which means she's definitely tied to something and is being hindered by it.
2. Obviously as you mentioned her being held and lifted up
3. There's some yawning and lip licking in the video which is generally a sign of stress and/or discomfort. Context matters of course but I feel like when you combine that with her trying to leave at several points it's a bad sign.

Edit: I make no attempt to claim she's being forced entirely to participate, the video doesn't seem to suggest that, but my main point is it seems unethical for her to be forced to stay in place and not leave/return as she pleases.
 
FloofyNewfie said:
That one has been reported a couple of times, and usually it's rejected due to the premise that the female dog seems to really be enjoying herself in the video, and is behaving like a typical receptive female dog in heat. But there is a couple of gray aspects to the video, such as the guy lifting her up, the fact that she has a leash on (not sure if it's attached to anything or just loose), and the fact that during one of the times the guy dismounted she wasn't allowed to spin and clean herself. But overall, the canine appears to be enjoying herself.

So it sits in the sort of "gray" category.
Click to expand...
I agree, she's definitely enjoying herself from what I see and not really restricted in her movement, a bit of a grey area with being picked up but I've had one that didn't mind at all.
 
Just a susden idea for improvement.

I was seeing a thread where soneone asked if there was sonething better and @pes just handled them a number of "better video threads"

So, my suggestion... Maybe, once a thread is "cleaned" and mostly decently viewable videos, you could add a known tag like "reviewed" or something similar.

That way:
1 - People knows it is mostly trash free. I mean even not-thst-bad things, like fake cum are still a total downer :D
2 - it will let people reviewing videos that thread was mostly reviewed already and work on another
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top