• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:

  • Total voters
    1,695
FoxandtheHounds said:
Thank you for that, I deleted my own post to get rid of their name in the quote. I guess I need to start translate checking more stuff. Second thing I did not check thoroughly enough today, my bad.

They're banned now.
Click to expand...
Nah. You people are fine and working overtime as you do. Let native speakers care for those details ?

I do not really mind a nasty name much as long as the person is doing good. But if someone is posting wrong things I'd take the bad name to be *meaningful*
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
Goattobeloved said:
Nah. You people are fine and working overtime as you do. Let native speakers care for those details ?

I do not really mind a nasty name much as long as the person is doing good. But if someone is posting wrong things I'd take the bad name to be *meaningful*
Click to expand...
What language was that? The translator I used did not recognize it even separated into individual words.
 
I PM'd pes the explanation.

Still, sometimes the same word can have different meanings, in this case words by separate... dogs playing this instrument

But the construction would not make sense for it when placed together. So basically better rely on a *insert language* native speaker in those cases.
9k=.jpg
 
Alternatively, copy and paste the original text here. I would like to think that I am not the only multilingual person here, so hopefully then a native speaker of that particular language could chime in.
 
The first video in post #2 and the last video in post #3 show the tail is held aside with ropes. The second video contains fisting, which I always find concerning because of the damage it can do. In addition, there is no reaction from the mare, not even winking at the end. The third video uses some sort of contraption which (I assume) is used for AI to keep her lips apart.

And of course she is tied up....

 
AppleDash said:
The first video in post #2 and the last video in post #3 show the tail is held aside with ropes. The second video contains fisting, which I always find concerning because of the damage it can do. In addition, there is no reaction from the mare, not even winking at the end. The third video uses some sort of contraption which (I assume) is used for AI to keep her lips apart.

And of course she is tied up....

Click to expand...
This one just keeps popping up, deleted yet again.
 
kingo said:
What the hell are you talking about? No one hit the dog or anyone for that matter. And handled how? He licks his owner and then has sex with her. The only time he is "handled" is when she strokes him while he licks her. Are you just making things up as an excuse to delete posts now? This is absured.
Click to expand...
So I guess you missed the part at about 1:12 into that video where she bops him on his head? Could've gotten nipped or something but that's no excuse. Or how about before that when to get him into the position she wanted him in the method she used was basically pushing him around and even kind of tossing him down there? That's what I meant by "handled".

I promise I am not, nor would I ever make things up just to delete posts or warn someone. It is ok if you are upset about it, a lot of people I warn are so focused on the sexual act itself the abuse goes unnoticed to them.
 
kingo said:
She literally taps him on the top of the head with her pointer finger and she also keeps her hand there as her fingers trace the side of his head, that is not a hit it's a pat. She doesn't push him away or shoo him nor does he even flinch. You're making things up to justify your own taste in videos and that's not what an impartial moderator should do.
Click to expand...
I am not making things up, I am impartial. Your post was reported, I reviewed it, and deleted it based on what I saw. If you disagree, you can feel free to report any of these posts, or any other messages including your warning for other mods to review.
 
Sounds like someone is a bit salty

I'm of the opinion that if it appears like abuse or forcing, it probably is.

Some dogs are trained as such but aren't abused and know their order
 
kingo said:
Makes it hard when you delete the content.





Here is the "hit" in question. Note she then runs this finger down the side of his face.

Brutal I know.
Click to expand...
There was a few more fingers there a few seconds earlier. Also, curious how old the pug is. It's not unusual for people to use puppies or smaller dogs in general because they will constantly lick. Which is why people use puppies. Justified in removal.
 
kingo said:
There were potentially two fingers in the frame before but we dont see contact made until that particular frame, it also doesnt change the fact that it wasn't a "hit."

And unless you're planning on carding each dog then you have to remove every single video based on being "curious how old the pug is." It's not a puppy it's a full grown dog. And for the record, it's not a pug it's a French Bulldog.

Therefore once again, your justification here is based on a preconceived notion and your own taste. Seriously, LOL at saying it's justified because you're curious and SOME people use puppies. The animal is clearly not a puppy and saying it "may be" and therefore the video needs to be deleted is an argument you need applied to ALL videos if that's the hill you want to die on. You can't pick and choose.

The facts are:

• There is no physical abuse in this video, the animal is not struck or hit, contact is made with one (or two) fingers at most and this is a pat that then moves down the side of the animal's face
• There is nothing in this video that would suggest the animal is a puppy, you're just saying that to justify the removal

This has been removed for no valid reason in line with the rules you've set out. Everyone in the video, human and animal, is of age. No one in the video, human or animal, was harmed or coerced in any way shape or form.
Click to expand...
There was a hit. It might not have been the most violent, but it was there. If you were 100% sure that video was ok, you would not have posted a screenshot that dances around the actual facts.

You said I was not impartial, I told you to take the opportunity to report me for other mods to look into this, and I stayed out of it. Not transparent or fair enough?

This is your hill, not ours. The video was reported for a dog being hit, no matter how slight, my name will not be on the report as the one letting that go. The reporter seen it, and I seen it. I even told you to report me for other eyes to look at it. I'm not going to argue about it in here anymore. This thread has a purpose, and I will not derail it any further.
 
kingo said:
I didnt post a screenshot that danced around the fact, I posted a screenshot of when we can see contact is made. The frame before hand her hand could very well be above his head, either way, it's TWO fingers instead of one. Im happy to post the whole video again for proof if I didnt think you'd use it as an excuse to ban me.

I have reported you, but as I said, I doubt moderators will turn on moderators.

There is no hit, it's a tap at worst, and probably a pat considering she runs her hand down his face in the exact same action and motion.

You are not being impartial.


What you do or do not like, is not impartial. You literally said you deleted something because you did not like it. Not because it broke any rules, but because you did not like it. That is literally the definition of not being impartial.


Being curious about something and justifying it being deleted, without any proof, just curiosity, is also not being impartial.

No rules have been broken, there was no violence against the animal, nor is it a puppy. This has been removed purely because of your high horse. Maybe someone else reported it, that's fine, dozens of people didnt, and it's your job as a moderator to remain impartial either way - and you've totally failed here.
Click to expand...
You're not getting it. I said I didn't like "the rest" "either". The abuse part is against the rules already obviously. Feel free to take it to the DF, we're not arguing in this thread anymore. Flaming and derailing threads is also against the rules, so have a nice reply ban.
 
kingo said:
There were potentially two fingers in the frame before but we dont see contact made until that particular frame, it also doesnt change the fact that it wasn't a "hit."

And unless you're planning on carding each dog then you have to remove every single video based on being "curious how old the pug is." It's not a puppy it's a full grown dog. And for the record, it's not a pug it's a French Bulldog.

Therefore once again, your justification here is based on a preconceived notion and your own taste. Seriously, LOL at saying it's justified because you're curious and SOME people use puppies. The animal is clearly not a puppy and saying it "may be" and therefore the video needs to be deleted is an argument you need applied to ALL videos if that's the hill you want to die on. You can't pick and choose.

The facts are:

• There is no physical abuse in this video, the animal is not struck or hit, contact is made with one (or two) fingers at most and this is a pat that then moves down the side of the animal's face
• There is nothing in this video that would suggest the animal is a puppy, you're just saying that to justify the removal

This has been removed for no valid reason in line with the rules you've set out. Everyone in the video, human and animal, is of age. No one in the video, human or animal, was harmed or coerced in any way shape or form.
Click to expand...
Oh fuck off. What the fuck are you arguing over porn that's not even yours to have posted in the first place? The rules even say if you don't have permission from its owner to post it then you can't.

Take your desire for internet points to go crawl back into your mom's basement.
 
I am open to any questions regarding my content. I love my dogs, and it's important to me that people understand that. My stuff is kind of a lot, but I'm the only one I'd consider to be receiving any kind of abuse in my videos. As someone who has made plenty of private adult content before, (you will not find it don't bother) I am also very comfortable with this for myself. IF this is decided to be an issue, I will have no problem with them being taken down. I am lewd, I am a lot, but I do want what's best for the community.
 
pes said:
Classics of commercial horse porn. I did not even watch the rest. But I am sure as you say it would have no erection, no humps, lame actress who has no clue and possibly fake cum from a limp penis.
Click to expand...
Just for your information there is erection and ejaculation during the first blowjob scene but this does not make up for the bound legs I agree.

I wouldn't find it arousing or post it if there wasn't hard cock or at least some real cum.
 
OK, so I downloaded it.
1. Head bound.
2. 4 legs bound.
3. 7:32 precum from a semi erect penis.
4. No flare.
5. No humps.
6. Two actresses who have absolutely no idea how to jerk a horse off. Of course a mare in front since they would not get the horse erect.
7. Shoving a semi erect penis into various bodily orifices.
8. No cumshot.
Classic commercial crap.
This is what it looks like when a horse ejaculates:
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/ultimate-horse-cumshot-compilation-10-minutes-long.59202/#post-1339454
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/zeta-mo-betta-productions-video-archive.5519/#post-197439
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/found-in-inet.51895/#post-1146980
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/fucked-by-my-first-big-stallion.39889/page-2#post-860778
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/fucked-by-my-first-big-stallion.39889/#post-850274
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/sexiest-horse-handjobs-and-cumshots-videos-pt-1.2757/
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/fuck-me-deep-and-hard.12545/
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/horse-gives-guy-facial.17843/#post-323968
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/good-thrusting-and-happy-ending.10069/#post-185789
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/guy-taking-a-stallions-load-to-the-face.37286/
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/data/video/256/256042-6926f03f556bfc69596785ebe8718252.mp4
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/internet-find-stallion-covers-a-man.64340/
 
Is this acceptable here? At 3.49 the actress clearly holds the hind leg while working the penis with her mouth. One of the actors holds the dog by the collar (e.g., 6.36). From 7.58 on, the actress is humping the penis, and although the dog is erect, there isn't much action from him here (see also 11.19). This goes on until 18.40 or so, and at 18.05 you can see the other actress firmly holding the tail aside. The dog is still held by the collar at 19.36 and losing erection around 20.55 but they keep on licking it.

 
pes said:
OK, so I downloaded it.
<analysis followed>
Click to expand...
Poor PES. Had to analyze this abusive bullshit in detail..

BestUnderneath said:
I never even realized all this time that the legs were bound, probably due to the poor resolution of the video.
Click to expand...
My guess would be more into the direction of "poor concentration and focus due to primitive urges overflowing", if not wholly ignorant..

Just watch whatever you plan to upload with closed pants and without being horny. Should be easier to focus on the surroundings and details, then..

And if it doesn't resemble the best for the animal, which automatically excludes any form of "bondage", fixation or comparable, which disallows the animal to at least go away if no interest is given.. then please don't upload it. Better just click the delete button on such crap.
 
YanchaOkami said:
if not wholly ignorant..
Click to expand...
I'm sorry I haven't been blessed with total enlightenment one week after openly discussing my interest in zoo publicly for the first time ever and my only exposure for years being mostly 'commercial crap'.

I would appreciate being educated instead of ridiculed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top