• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:

  • Total voters
    1,868
kingo said:
I didnt post a screenshot that danced around the fact, I posted a screenshot of when we can see contact is made. The frame before hand her hand could very well be above his head, either way, it's TWO fingers instead of one. Im happy to post the whole video again for proof if I didnt think you'd use it as an excuse to ban me.

I have reported you, but as I said, I doubt moderators will turn on moderators.

There is no hit, it's a tap at worst, and probably a pat considering she runs her hand down his face in the exact same action and motion.

You are not being impartial.


What you do or do not like, is not impartial. You literally said you deleted something because you did not like it. Not because it broke any rules, but because you did not like it. That is literally the definition of not being impartial.


Being curious about something and justifying it being deleted, without any proof, just curiosity, is also not being impartial.

No rules have been broken, there was no violence against the animal, nor is it a puppy. This has been removed purely because of your high horse. Maybe someone else reported it, that's fine, dozens of people didnt, and it's your job as a moderator to remain impartial either way - and you've totally failed here.
Click to expand...
You're not getting it. I said I didn't like "the rest" "either". The abuse part is against the rules already obviously. Feel free to take it to the DF, we're not arguing in this thread anymore. Flaming and derailing threads is also against the rules, so have a nice reply ban.
 
kingo said:
There were potentially two fingers in the frame before but we dont see contact made until that particular frame, it also doesnt change the fact that it wasn't a "hit."

And unless you're planning on carding each dog then you have to remove every single video based on being "curious how old the pug is." It's not a puppy it's a full grown dog. And for the record, it's not a pug it's a French Bulldog.

Therefore once again, your justification here is based on a preconceived notion and your own taste. Seriously, LOL at saying it's justified because you're curious and SOME people use puppies. The animal is clearly not a puppy and saying it "may be" and therefore the video needs to be deleted is an argument you need applied to ALL videos if that's the hill you want to die on. You can't pick and choose.

The facts are:

• There is no physical abuse in this video, the animal is not struck or hit, contact is made with one (or two) fingers at most and this is a pat that then moves down the side of the animal's face
• There is nothing in this video that would suggest the animal is a puppy, you're just saying that to justify the removal

This has been removed for no valid reason in line with the rules you've set out. Everyone in the video, human and animal, is of age. No one in the video, human or animal, was harmed or coerced in any way shape or form.
Click to expand...
Oh fuck off. What the fuck are you arguing over porn that's not even yours to have posted in the first place? The rules even say if you don't have permission from its owner to post it then you can't.

Take your desire for internet points to go crawl back into your mom's basement.
 
I am open to any questions regarding my content. I love my dogs, and it's important to me that people understand that. My stuff is kind of a lot, but I'm the only one I'd consider to be receiving any kind of abuse in my videos. As someone who has made plenty of private adult content before, (you will not find it don't bother) I am also very comfortable with this for myself. IF this is decided to be an issue, I will have no problem with them being taken down. I am lewd, I am a lot, but I do want what's best for the community.
 
pes said:
Classics of commercial horse porn. I did not even watch the rest. But I am sure as you say it would have no erection, no humps, lame actress who has no clue and possibly fake cum from a limp penis.
Click to expand...
Just for your information there is erection and ejaculation during the first blowjob scene but this does not make up for the bound legs I agree.

I wouldn't find it arousing or post it if there wasn't hard cock or at least some real cum.
 
OK, so I downloaded it.
1. Head bound.
2. 4 legs bound.
3. 7:32 precum from a semi erect penis.
4. No flare.
5. No humps.
6. Two actresses who have absolutely no idea how to jerk a horse off. Of course a mare in front since they would not get the horse erect.
7. Shoving a semi erect penis into various bodily orifices.
8. No cumshot.
Classic commercial crap.
This is what it looks like when a horse ejaculates:
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/ultimate-horse-cumshot-compilation-10-minutes-long.59202/#post-1339454
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/zeta-mo-betta-productions-video-archive.5519/#post-197439
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/found-in-inet.51895/#post-1146980
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/fucked-by-my-first-big-stallion.39889/page-2#post-860778
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/fucked-by-my-first-big-stallion.39889/#post-850274
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/sexiest-horse-handjobs-and-cumshots-videos-pt-1.2757/
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/fuck-me-deep-and-hard.12545/
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/horse-gives-guy-facial.17843/#post-323968
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/good-thrusting-and-happy-ending.10069/#post-185789
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/guy-taking-a-stallions-load-to-the-face.37286/
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/data/video/256/256042-6926f03f556bfc69596785ebe8718252.mp4
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/internet-find-stallion-covers-a-man.64340/
 
Is this acceptable here? At 3.49 the actress clearly holds the hind leg while working the penis with her mouth. One of the actors holds the dog by the collar (e.g., 6.36). From 7.58 on, the actress is humping the penis, and although the dog is erect, there isn't much action from him here (see also 11.19). This goes on until 18.40 or so, and at 18.05 you can see the other actress firmly holding the tail aside. The dog is still held by the collar at 19.36 and losing erection around 20.55 but they keep on licking it.

 
pes said:
OK, so I downloaded it.
<analysis followed>
Click to expand...
Poor PES. Had to analyze this abusive bullshit in detail..

BestUnderneath said:
I never even realized all this time that the legs were bound, probably due to the poor resolution of the video.
Click to expand...
My guess would be more into the direction of "poor concentration and focus due to primitive urges overflowing", if not wholly ignorant..

Just watch whatever you plan to upload with closed pants and without being horny. Should be easier to focus on the surroundings and details, then..

And if it doesn't resemble the best for the animal, which automatically excludes any form of "bondage", fixation or comparable, which disallows the animal to at least go away if no interest is given.. then please don't upload it. Better just click the delete button on such crap.
 
YanchaOkami said:
if not wholly ignorant..
Click to expand...
I'm sorry I haven't been blessed with total enlightenment one week after openly discussing my interest in zoo publicly for the first time ever and my only exposure for years being mostly 'commercial crap'.

I would appreciate being educated instead of ridiculed.
 
BestUnderneath said:
I would appreciate being educated instead of ridiculed.
Click to expand...
You are being educated here. I explained to you what is wrong with the video.
For more education:

Crap porn identification

Some bad/abusive porn shows up frequently. (Surprisingly it is often commercial zoo porn, who would have guessed.) So this place will accumulate identification screenshots along with links to the reports for fast reference...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net

Community cum education efforts

There was recently a discussion here that touches the topic of fake cum used in predominantly commercial zoo porn. https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/horse-question.44067/#post-947723 That brought me to an idea of creating educational material that would undeniably demonstrate what real...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net

What is worth reporting (with examples and images)

Over the past few weeks I have been told that people are not sure what to report or what to look out for in videos. So here over time I will put examples and occasionally images of the stuff I regularly report and get successful removals from. Reporting content does not automatically remove it...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net

[ZOOVILLE RULES]

(Rules are subject to being updated over time. Click the Watch button at the top of this post to be notified of new posts in this thread.) Agreement to read and view adult material: The sites is designed and intended to be used by consenting adults - people who are at least 18 years old. Legal...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net
 
pes said:
You are being educated here. I explained to you what is wrong with the video.
For more education:

Crap porn identification

Some bad/abusive porn shows up frequently. (Surprisingly it is often commercial zoo porn, who would have guessed.) So this place will accumulate identification screenshots along with links to the reports for fast reference...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net

Community cum education efforts

There was recently a discussion here that touches the topic of fake cum used in predominantly commercial zoo porn. https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/horse-question.44067/#post-947723 That brought me to an idea of creating educational material that would undeniably demonstrate what real...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net

What is worth reporting (with examples and images)

Over the past few weeks I have been told that people are not sure what to report or what to look out for in videos. So here over time I will put examples and occasionally images of the stuff I regularly report and get successful removals from. Reporting content does not automatically remove it...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net

[ZOOVILLE RULES]

(Rules are subject to being updated over time. Click the Watch button at the top of this post to be notified of new posts in this thread.) Agreement to read and view adult material: The sites is designed and intended to be used by consenting adults - people who are at least 18 years old. Legal...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net
Click to expand...

That wasn't a reference to you (a mod) who has explained things to me when asked, thanks for that by the way.

I specifically quoted a random user to came along to stick the knife in and call me ignorant, blind, horny, etc, etc, etc... I'm pretty sure we had subject well in hand.

Regardless, it honestly seems like life will be easier just not uploading any videos.
 
BestUnderneath said:
I'm sorry I haven't been blessed with total enlightenment one week after openly discussing my interest in zoo publicly for the first time ever and my only exposure for years being mostly 'commercial crap'.

I would appreciate being educated instead of ridiculed.
Click to expand...
I did not insult you at all. And I can't "judge" about you in any way - in regards of forum rules, as I'm just an user here.

I only stated that "the bad resolution" reads like a joke, if other people detected multiple signs of commercial crap by the first look unto the media, hm? Before even watching it fully.

Forgive me for being direct, but you wouldn't believe how FUCKING often and repeatedly one stumbles over such crap uploaded. In the .nets, fortunately less on ZooVille due to the quick and quality handling through reports.

As such a type of allergy begins to form and it's hard to "not tell you directly how your postings read", but instead be caring, loving and welcoming, washing all bad thoughts about your actions aside. ?‍♂️


If you want some sort of "how to identify commercial or abusive crap" tutorial, I believe to have read some quite informative list / "don't"s of media to check for written by @pes in the past, but don't know right now where to find it.
Ah, he already linked them, perfect.
 
I was about to post a similar response. What may come across as a snide or ridiculing remark is the result of seeing too many uploads of questionable media, be it because it's fake / commercial, or downright abusive. Ideally, people would only upload material when thinking with their upper brains rather than the trousers region. Ideally, people would also know they have the choice between reading up on the material the forum staff like @pes provided and then decide what (not) to post, or acknowledging that you cannot trust yourself to post what is within forum rules, and refrain from uploading. The choice is yours.
 
I am not falsifying an excuse when I say I did not notice the few moments of a 38 minute video I usually jump though to get to my favorite parts for a total of 5-10 minutes watching and yes, it would be hard to notice at that resolution/bit-rate when skipping by to the closest POV of the female with the cock.

One other thing I feel should be taken into consideration when dealing with newbies like me, believe it or not I don't actually want to see animal abuse, until now I've only considered it in much broader strokes involving gore, hitting/kicking, audible suffering, etc which I obviously never want to see and avoid like the plague.

Understanding the techniques used in commercial porn the past such as bounding the legs etc or one moment of the dog trying to leave and a woman holding it's leg do not register automatically on the same scale as much more obvious abuse when it's never been brought to your attention before and you most likely are thinking to yourself, if that dog or horse doesn't want to fuck that women she will know about it, possibly die.

Not everyone that joins this forum including me are every going to be amateur or professional veterinarians obsessing about the diameter of every flare and what it means, the one moment in a video when a dog may see something else interesting and try to leave for a moment and trying to understand the dogs psychological motivation at that precise moment in time, which type of the three types of cum (see I learned something) it's producing and therefore how much he is enjoying himself.

So yes, a little patience and a little less automatically implying someone is lying would be appreciated, I also don't like abuse but until now my standards have been much less rigorous and I haven't had cause to consider them, now I do.
 
BestUnderneath said:
One other thing I feel should be taken into consideration when dealing with newbies like me, believe it or not I don't actually want to see animal abuse, ..
Click to expand...
One more reason to check in detail what you are going to upload, or?

BestUnderneath said:
Not everyone that joins this forum including me are every going to be amateur or professional veterinarians obsessing about the diameter of every flare and what it means, the one moment in a video when ..
Click to expand...
Understandable. But you had (and have) all time in the world to check the video you think is worth uploading prior to this process for compatibility with the rules and the fairness, respect and love in regards to the animals shown.

You're a newbie here, absolutely OK. Welcome to ZooVille.

But after you've uploaded something made of commercial / abusive crap, it's a bit late to expect users to not include your prior actions into their thoughts about you. In a direct response to your action, tho.

That's not because they hate you as a newbie or wouldn't welcome you. It's a reaction following something you decided to do. The patience is infinite beforehand of uploading something that breaks rules - or if it doesn't break rules, but after doing this.. you should except at least some sarcasm or plain disliking of the action you did. I didn't call you a liar, by the way - just stated the impression your "resolution" response left in me.
 
Cookiecaretaker said:
Click to expand...

Thank you for mentioning what's happening in the thread, it's a shame to see how people even praise them.

I couldn't check and report it in the thread itself due to "not playing" - just audio. But in regards of..
FloofyNewfie said:
I'm hoping someone will give that one a review soon. Due to work, right now, I'm not in any position to watch the videos.
Click to expand...
.. I'll download it to check it locally and report it if verified. Angers me.

@FloofyNewfie : Do you need another mod / admin to check it cross-wise? Or would it be enough to have 2-3 screenshots showing that she's actually held down here to take action?
 
FloofyNewfie said:
I'm hoping someone will give that one a review soon. Due to work, right now, I'm not in any position to watch the videos.
Click to expand...
Unapproved to download it all.
YanchaOkami said:
Thank you for mentioning what's happening in the thread, it's a shame to see how people even praise them.

I couldn't check and report it in the thread itself due to "not playing" - just audio. But in regards of..

.. I'll download it to check it locally and report it if verified. Angers me.

@FloofyNewfie : Do you need another mod / admin to check it cross-wise? Or would it be enough to have 2-3 screenshots showing that she's actually held down here to take action?
Click to expand...
Many others are welcome to check it out as well... Although if you haven't gotten to it yet, its now in approval status.. Though I could send you some links to it directly
 
Takes a while, but proceeds actually. Seems the D/L was started right before unapproval.

I'll report in short after they're completed.

DL takes a while.png
 
First one shows quite rough handling of that dog girl, but no holding down, as the actual handling starts only after the end of it. It seems to resemble one video cut in five parts.

Second one at 0:25 seconds shows her getting up and he tries to keep her down, but the video is cut shortly afterwards.
I've uploaded a screenshot which is somewhat safe for work and shows the type of handling:

vlcsnap-2023-10-29-02h55m53s518.png
Second half and third to fifth follow..
 
They hold her on the hind legs almost the whole time.

On pt. 3 there's a 2 frame timeframe in which it's visible that she's held down on the belly as well, while most focused on the legs / hind area, as such harder to see. At 1:10 minutes she's trying to get up, but held down again until she can get free. Then it's cut to the other recording device again.

2 frames where it is visible that she's not even only held on the hind legs obviously:

vlcsnap-2023-10-29-03h00m54s415.png

With the other recording device it's ways clearer that she's held down by both most of the time, see this at 1:16 of pt.3:

vlcsnap-2023-10-29-03h05m23s449.png

He (the other guy) then sits over her.. She can't actually move with two people holding her down.

By the way: sorry for not-SFW pictures, I might hide them in a spoiler. It's just not possible to upload those somewhat SFW. ?‍♂️
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top