• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:

  • Total voters
    1,872
dogluver101 said:
View attachment 479650
smh... I don't think I have to explain the part of that.
If that's true, guess there's gonna be another article about someone getting caught.
Click to expand...
We are going to see this a lot probably.

Does anyone know who she is?! She’s fine as hell.

We need more of her!
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net
Report on sight. Always remove.
1. Shows face.
2. Improper handling.
3. Fetishits are already trying to dox her.
4. If the link is to be believed she is fencehopping.
 
@pes Was that "who is she" already asking about that lady in dogluvers post?? Shesh... fast!

Worst of that is most of those don't wish them harm, more like the opposite. And wishfully thinking if they contact her, she'll be happy to talk to them.

They just don't think.
...Don't realise of their identity is out there, someone will cause big troubles
 
pes said:
We are going to see this a lot probably.
Click to expand...
Hopefully not.

Anyone dumb enough to actually upload media proving their involved status regarding animal "abuse" (in terms of most countries laws) regarding remote animals of different owners should just put a sticker stating their sexual preferences to their forehead and go jaywalking in a shopping aisle preferably filled by ex-inmates from biker gangs after 9 PM..

..and exclude the poor animals from potential media and law enforcement attention. Goddamn idiots (the humans doing this, not the animals).

In the utmost cases those animals will suffer under such dumb activities. Even if "just the owners" placed a camera surveillance unknown to the dog caretaker, it might still produce lots of hassle for the owners & animal(s).
 
My two cents… Some day I hope that people accept Zoophilia and add a “Z” to the growing LGBTQ_ _ _ acronym. From what I see, it seems like the two main attacks we get from the rest of the world is that 1. it is immoral and 2. It is abusive which is in my opinion why animal rights groups have been able to get law makers to pass legislation that makes it illegal essentially everywhere. all of the abusive porn over the internet is giving our community the biggest black eye… it needs to stop or we will never see the day people’s opinions turn around. If it becomes difficult to convince people that zoophiles abuse animals, then the immoral part is easy to get past… just think, it was considered immoral to be any of the LGBTQ acronym 40-50 years ago… we’ve come a long way since. So speak up when you see abuse… it hurts animals AND the people that love them.
 
FoxandtheHounds said:
Thank you for that, I deleted my own post to get rid of their name in the quote. I guess I need to start translate checking more stuff. Second thing I did not check thoroughly enough today, my bad.

They're banned now.
Click to expand...
Nah. You people are fine and working overtime as you do. Let native speakers care for those details ?

I do not really mind a nasty name much as long as the person is doing good. But if someone is posting wrong things I'd take the bad name to be *meaningful*
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
Goattobeloved said:
Nah. You people are fine and working overtime as you do. Let native speakers care for those details ?

I do not really mind a nasty name much as long as the person is doing good. But if someone is posting wrong things I'd take the bad name to be *meaningful*
Click to expand...
What language was that? The translator I used did not recognize it even separated into individual words.
 
I PM'd pes the explanation.

Still, sometimes the same word can have different meanings, in this case words by separate... dogs playing this instrument

But the construction would not make sense for it when placed together. So basically better rely on a *insert language* native speaker in those cases.
9k=.jpg
 
Alternatively, copy and paste the original text here. I would like to think that I am not the only multilingual person here, so hopefully then a native speaker of that particular language could chime in.
 
The first video in post #2 and the last video in post #3 show the tail is held aside with ropes. The second video contains fisting, which I always find concerning because of the damage it can do. In addition, there is no reaction from the mare, not even winking at the end. The third video uses some sort of contraption which (I assume) is used for AI to keep her lips apart.

And of course she is tied up....

 
AppleDash said:
The first video in post #2 and the last video in post #3 show the tail is held aside with ropes. The second video contains fisting, which I always find concerning because of the damage it can do. In addition, there is no reaction from the mare, not even winking at the end. The third video uses some sort of contraption which (I assume) is used for AI to keep her lips apart.

And of course she is tied up....

Click to expand...
This one just keeps popping up, deleted yet again.
 
kingo said:
What the hell are you talking about? No one hit the dog or anyone for that matter. And handled how? He licks his owner and then has sex with her. The only time he is "handled" is when she strokes him while he licks her. Are you just making things up as an excuse to delete posts now? This is absured.
Click to expand...
So I guess you missed the part at about 1:12 into that video where she bops him on his head? Could've gotten nipped or something but that's no excuse. Or how about before that when to get him into the position she wanted him in the method she used was basically pushing him around and even kind of tossing him down there? That's what I meant by "handled".

I promise I am not, nor would I ever make things up just to delete posts or warn someone. It is ok if you are upset about it, a lot of people I warn are so focused on the sexual act itself the abuse goes unnoticed to them.
 
kingo said:
She literally taps him on the top of the head with her pointer finger and she also keeps her hand there as her fingers trace the side of his head, that is not a hit it's a pat. She doesn't push him away or shoo him nor does he even flinch. You're making things up to justify your own taste in videos and that's not what an impartial moderator should do.
Click to expand...
I am not making things up, I am impartial. Your post was reported, I reviewed it, and deleted it based on what I saw. If you disagree, you can feel free to report any of these posts, or any other messages including your warning for other mods to review.
 
Sounds like someone is a bit salty

I'm of the opinion that if it appears like abuse or forcing, it probably is.

Some dogs are trained as such but aren't abused and know their order
 
kingo said:
Makes it hard when you delete the content.





Here is the "hit" in question. Note she then runs this finger down the side of his face.

Brutal I know.
Click to expand...
There was a few more fingers there a few seconds earlier. Also, curious how old the pug is. It's not unusual for people to use puppies or smaller dogs in general because they will constantly lick. Which is why people use puppies. Justified in removal.
 
kingo said:
There were potentially two fingers in the frame before but we dont see contact made until that particular frame, it also doesnt change the fact that it wasn't a "hit."

And unless you're planning on carding each dog then you have to remove every single video based on being "curious how old the pug is." It's not a puppy it's a full grown dog. And for the record, it's not a pug it's a French Bulldog.

Therefore once again, your justification here is based on a preconceived notion and your own taste. Seriously, LOL at saying it's justified because you're curious and SOME people use puppies. The animal is clearly not a puppy and saying it "may be" and therefore the video needs to be deleted is an argument you need applied to ALL videos if that's the hill you want to die on. You can't pick and choose.

The facts are:

• There is no physical abuse in this video, the animal is not struck or hit, contact is made with one (or two) fingers at most and this is a pat that then moves down the side of the animal's face
• There is nothing in this video that would suggest the animal is a puppy, you're just saying that to justify the removal

This has been removed for no valid reason in line with the rules you've set out. Everyone in the video, human and animal, is of age. No one in the video, human or animal, was harmed or coerced in any way shape or form.
Click to expand...
There was a hit. It might not have been the most violent, but it was there. If you were 100% sure that video was ok, you would not have posted a screenshot that dances around the actual facts.

You said I was not impartial, I told you to take the opportunity to report me for other mods to look into this, and I stayed out of it. Not transparent or fair enough?

This is your hill, not ours. The video was reported for a dog being hit, no matter how slight, my name will not be on the report as the one letting that go. The reporter seen it, and I seen it. I even told you to report me for other eyes to look at it. I'm not going to argue about it in here anymore. This thread has a purpose, and I will not derail it any further.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top