Sexy
video
We are going to see this a lot probably.View attachment 479650
smh... I don't think I have to explain the part of that.
If that's true, guess there's gonna be another article about someone getting caught.
Because asking who she is is not technically against the rules.Why not remove those particular fetishists then?
Yes.@pes Was that "who is she" already asking about that lady in dogluvers post?? Shesh... fast!
Hopefully not.We are going to see this a lot probably.
You may as well power edit his user name, for what is worth ??Known abuse I've deleted before, and some others. Dogs held in place, yanked by tail, and an aggressive blowjob that was infuriating. 3 point warning between two posts. I also deleted the gif from your avatar.
Thank you for that, I deleted my own post to get rid of their name in the quote. I guess I need to start translate checking more stuff. Second thing I did not check thoroughly enough today, my bad.You may as well power edit his user name, for what is worth ??
Nah. You people are fine and working overtime as you do. Let native speakers care for those details ?Thank you for that, I deleted my own post to get rid of their name in the quote. I guess I need to start translate checking more stuff. Second thing I did not check thoroughly enough today, my bad.
They're banned now.
What language was that? The translator I used did not recognize it even separated into individual words.Nah. You people are fine and working overtime as you do. Let native speakers care for those details ?
I do not really mind a nasty name much as long as the person is doing good. But if someone is posting wrong things I'd take the bad name to be *meaningful*
When I double checked it before deleting my post and banning them I got spanish.What language was that? The translator I used did not recognize it even separated into individual words.
This one just keeps popping up, deleted yet again.The first video in post #2 and the last video in post #3 show the tail is held aside with ropes. The second video contains fisting, which I always find concerning because of the damage it can do. In addition, there is no reaction from the mare, not even winking at the end. The third video uses some sort of contraption which (I assume) is used for AI to keep her lips apart.
And of course she is tied up....
Why? Why hit a dog in any way though? I didn't like the rest of the way he was handled either. Deleted, 2 permanent warning points.[ATTACH[/ATTACH]
So I guess you missed the part at about 1:12 into that video where she bops him on his head? Could've gotten nipped or something but that's no excuse. Or how about before that when to get him into the position she wanted him in the method she used was basically pushing him around and even kind of tossing him down there? That's what I meant by "handled".What the hell are you talking about? No one hit the dog or anyone for that matter. And handled how? He licks his owner and then has sex with her. The only time he is "handled" is when she strokes him while he licks her. Are you just making things up as an excuse to delete posts now? This is absured.
I am not making things up, I am impartial. Your post was reported, I reviewed it, and deleted it based on what I saw. If you disagree, you can feel free to report any of these posts, or any other messages including your warning for other mods to review.She literally taps him on the top of the head with her pointer finger and she also keeps her hand there as her fingers trace the side of his head, that is not a hit it's a pat. She doesn't push him away or shoo him nor does he even flinch. You're making things up to justify your own taste in videos and that's not what an impartial moderator should do.
There was a few more fingers there a few seconds earlier. Also, curious how old the pug is. It's not unusual for people to use puppies or smaller dogs in general because they will constantly lick. Which is why people use puppies. Justified in removal.Makes it hard when you delete the content.
Here is the "hit" in question. Note she then runs this finger down the side of his face.
Brutal I know.
There was a hit. It might not have been the most violent, but it was there. If you were 100% sure that video was ok, you would not have posted a screenshot that dances around the actual facts.There were potentially two fingers in the frame before but we dont see contact made until that particular frame, it also doesnt change the fact that it wasn't a "hit."
And unless you're planning on carding each dog then you have to remove every single video based on being "curious how old the pug is." It's not a puppy it's a full grown dog. And for the record, it's not a pug it's a French Bulldog.
Therefore once again, your justification here is based on a preconceived notion and your own taste. Seriously, LOL at saying it's justified because you're curious and SOME people use puppies. The animal is clearly not a puppy and saying it "may be" and therefore the video needs to be deleted is an argument you need applied to ALL videos if that's the hill you want to die on. You can't pick and choose.
The facts are:
• There is no physical abuse in this video, the animal is not struck or hit, contact is made with one (or two) fingers at most and this is a pat that then moves down the side of the animal's face
• There is nothing in this video that would suggest the animal is a puppy, you're just saying that to justify the removal
This has been removed for no valid reason in line with the rules you've set out. Everyone in the video, human and animal, is of age. No one in the video, human or animal, was harmed or coerced in any way shape or form.