• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:


  • Total voters
    1,695
I think fake cum or drugging the animal to be hornier should be included in things to remove.

99% of videos I've seen in zoophilia are either fake brazilian stuff or forcing animals either physically or with use of drugs
 
this "need more intel on X" is creepy as fuck. and what's the point anyway? getting to a live show? marry her?
Sad thing is that I had no clue how many people like this were out there before coming to ZV.

Other sad thing is just how many of them gravitate here just because it would seem that they assume that just because we're animal fuckers, that we must be ok with all the downright sick shit as well.

I am thankful for the people that work so hard to keep as much of this kind of shit out as they can.
 
Oh, all drugging of animals is absolutely horrible.
It was a question of why they drugged the animals, not what drugging we should allow. The answer about what drugging should be allowed is ZERO.
There are few common reasons drugs are used:

Some species like horses have retractor muscles to pull their penis back into their sheath when not in use. So if you use a muscle relaxant on that muscle the animal can't keep their penis inside their sheath. And thus to those that don't know any better they think the horse has an erection rather than just being dropped from the sheath.

A sedated animal is a lot calmer and will put up with more because they aren't fully aware/cognizant of what is being done to them.

Anesthetic can dull the feeling of pain so the animal doesn't attack the human forcing something in their ass for example.

I would not be held responsible if I ever witnessed someone doing such things to make an animal compliant for sex! The use of drugs to obtain sexual contact is reprehensible.

Other uses for drugs outside of abusive porn creation are things like collecting semen from a wild animal in a captive breeding situation where it might be dangerous to extract the sample. So they sedate the lion or whatever and use electro-ejaculation to extract the semen. It's debatable ethically if this practice is abuse or not. It is Non-Consensual, but is done for the preservation of the species.
 
Last edited:
There are few common reasons drugs are used:

Some species like horses have retractor muscles to pull their penis back into their sheath when not in use. So if you use a muscle relaxant on that muscle the animal can't keep their penis inside their sheath. And thus to those that don't know any better they think the horse has an erection rather than just being dropped from the sheath.

A sedated animal is a lot calmer and will put up with more because they aren't fully aware/cognizant of what is being done to them.

Anesthetic can dull the feeling of pain so the animal doesn't attack the human forcing something in their ass for example.

I would not be held responsible if I ever saw someone doing such things to make an animal compliant for sex! The use of drugs for any of the reasons I just described is reprehensible.
So summarized as rape.

But thank you for your explanation, I have wondered why the stallions equipment is just hanging there the very few times I have seen such a video.
When he really wants to it is very hard, and not just dangling under him.
 
So summarized as rape.

But thank you for your explanation, I have wondered why the stallions equipment is just hanging there the very few times I have seen such a video.
When he really wants to it is very hard, and not just dangling under him.
Correct, just dangling there is a common sign drugs were used. That's not to say it can't happen if they teased the stallion with a mare in estrus, he started out as hard naturally but then became soft with some human mishandling his penis. But usually when a horse loses their erection they also retract very soon afterwards. Even after a stallion has just ejaculated they often start to retract before they have even finish dripping the last drops of their cum.
 
this "need more intel on X" is creepy as fuck. and what's the point anyway? getting to a live show? marry her?
Probably the same reason those kind of people try to find out as much as possible about the female users here.
Some wants to doxx them, but most want to "join in" either with content just for them (power dynamic) or a physical meetup where they can watch irl and perhaps get a chance to insert their own little pecker in the woman.
If food is being used to make the dog lick when they wouldn't do so otherwise, that is baiting and should be reported.
I did, mods get to decide now.
And sorry in advance to the mod that needs to watch it.
 
I would like to point out that asking for or posting personal information is going to get people banned eventually especially when it is not your personal information.

This gem just got you a 3 months long ban. Enjoy.

As a zoo I am not going to tolerate anyone trying to dox people who have sex with animals. Not only because it is incredibly disrespectful but also because it threatens the lives of their animals.
Several users had to escape the forum after being stalked by morons who think they are entitled to watch them have sex with animals. You are not.
On top the same type of idiots then has the audacity to complain that there is no new porn.
Well guys if you treat the people who make porn for you this way, it is your own fault.
I could not agree more with this. Which is why two more users just got the same. 3 month ban for posting a full name and far too much more over a search for a video.

@k9partnerNL and @Faun do not dox people.
 
Abusing animals like drugging, muzzling, or forcing them to do things is sickening
I hope those poor animals get a better home and recover well from that trauma
 
Another bright mind testing how long a ban you can get for posting PII of someone who is not you.
2nd time same problem. Sometimes you really have to wonder.
I changed it to permanent. There is no way this mother fucker is getting a third chance at doxxing and second chance at posting some abusive shit.

If someone gets a warning or temp ban for something that bad and they repeat the offense, it needs a permanent ban in my book.
 
Latest post by Zoohorse, already reported. andr603b, SuperStud86 and Lycanherve apparently were thinking with their dicks and missed the chain on the front left foot of the poor elephant. He also seems agitated, from what I understand of elephants.
andr603b, SuperStud86 and Lycanherve should at the very least get a warning for liking that.
What the hell is wrong with people if they think it is okay to post content with restrained animals?
 
andr603b, SuperStud86 and Lycanherve should at the very least get a warning for liking that.
What the hell is wrong with people if they think it is okay to post content with restrained animals?
FoxandtheHounds has mentioned that:
Reacting to abusive content in a positive way has resulted in warnings and bans for several users in the past.
But yes, it's sad and disgusting, and I even got so sickened by it I ended up donating anonymously to an elephant rescue to make up for it.
 
And deleted. Thank you to the mod who did that :D

Honestly if I wouldn't get warning/banned for it, I'd love to just respond to any of those posts with a picture of Pan Lin, an elephant who spent 25 years carting around tourists and got a deformed back for it, or that video of the "trainers" of these work elephants beating an exhausted elephant with pipes to show the hell these animals go through. Then again that one guy didn't notice the chains cutting into the leg of his "favorite bull" so I doubt it would do much.

As a note, don't look up Pan Lin if you have a tender heart. It's sad.
 
So I'm noticing that This Thread had one video on the page that needed to be reported; the mare was trussed up like a Christmas Ham and fidgeting, possibly not wanting to be bred (I didn't watch past the first second to see her body language.

I reported it, but with 50+ pages of content and comment to comb through, this might need some help. I'd appreciate any assistance. With it being a solo thread there shouldn't be a whole lot, but where there's one... I've checked 54-56 as of my posting this.
 
Back
Top