allistair_crowe443
Tourist
what was it?Just as a heads up, this post i reported about, it was officially released for the public a week or two ago, so its now good.
what was it?Just as a heads up, this post i reported about, it was officially released for the public a week or two ago, so its now good.
Yiff art.what was it?
and nothing of value was lostYiff art.
Which you can say about every single deleted piece of porn as well.and nothing of value was lost
Which you can say about every single one of his unfullfilled pirate request threads.Which you can say about every single deleted piece of porn as well.
But something doesn't have to be violent to be abusive, over handling a dog penis and letting it dry out or become overly sensitive or painful can be abusive but is not necessarily violent. Or sedating a horse so they drop there penis so somebody can play with it is not violent but is still abuse as you are forcing the animal into something that is not for their benefit, such as say giving a vaccination injection, is not pleasant for the animal, (no one likes needles) but the potential pain involved is to benefit them by protecting the animal from something.Violent abuse is just simply wrong....now the word "abuse" today is quite "woked" so I hope the moderators are reasonable folk.
not quite what I said ok..but yes agree what you are saying.....was just making the point that the word "abuse" these days can be "woked" to the point of ridiculous in my opinionBut something doesn't have to be violent to be abusive, over handling a dog penis and letting it dry out or become overly sensitive or painful can be abusive but is not necessarily violent. Or sedating a horse so they drop there penis so somebody can play with it is not violent but is still abuse as you are forcing the animal into something that is not for their benefit, such as say giving a vaccination injection, is not pleasant for the animal, (no one likes needles) but the potential pain involved is to benefit them by protecting the animal from something.
Abuse can be intentional or accidental, but from the animals point of view it's still a problem. It is from their perspective that we must determine if something is abusive or not. They are on the receiving end of it after all.
Maybe I'm just missing your point I thought woke meant "aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues such as racial and social justice." So in relation to the abuse of animals I'm not sure how being actively attentive to something that could be harmful to animals could be a bad thing. And I don't feel that it is possible to be over attentive to something when it comes to the animals we share this planet with. But I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, perhaps we just have different definitions of "woke".not quite what I said ok..but yes agree what you are saying.....was just making the point that the word "abuse" these days can be "woked" to the point of ridiculous in my opinion
The history of "woke" starts with the African American English vernacular long before Black Lives Matter became a political force with the evolution of the meaning "woke" in their movement. It has further evolved and been politicalized, rightfully or wrongly, both on the political right as too progressive and the political left as "abuse" in one form or another. Thus, the definition is just not that simple as stated "aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues such as racial and social justice." The meaning has evolved from racial and social justice to put it simply "I don't like it therefore I am offended"Maybe I'm just missing your point I thought woke meant "aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues such as racial and social justice." So in relation to the abuse of animals I'm not sure how being actively attentive to something that could be harmful to animals could be a bad thing. And I don't feel that it is possible to be over attentive to something when it comes to the animals we share this planet with. But I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, perhaps we just have different definitions of "woke".
As for your comment about the mods hopefully being reasonable folk, they act in all cases that I have been aware of on the side of the animal based on knowledge of the species involved. There are also site rules defining what sort of content is not allowed here, so this is also the framework in which they work. This thread was made so users could speak with others about something they thought might be abusive, but were not sure if it was or not. Thus didn't want to report it in case they were mistaken or didn't feel comfortable reporting it themself for some reason. Overall I think the systems of checks and balances works fairly well on this site, but is a never ending job given a lot of the commercial crap that gets constantly uploaded to the porn section here
Ok, the way you put that is basically why this thread is here, to help people find out if their concerns are valid or over reactions because they can't read the animal clear enough. None of us are born experts on every species.The history of "woke" starts with the African American English vernacular long before Black Lives Matter became a political force with the evolution of the meaning "woke" in their movement. It has further evolved and been politicalized, rightfully or wrongly, both on the political right as too progressive and the political left as "abuse" in one form or another. Thus, the definition is just not that simple as stated "aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues such as racial and social justice." The meaning has evolved from racial and social justice to put it simply "I don't like it therefore I am offended"
This thread is about abusive porn clean-up, and I totally agree. I read and participate only on a portion of the threads that interest me. Some I disagree with or question the content but when I do disagree I ask myself...am I being too "woke"? I do commend the moderators.
It is ok.I couldn't open the video in this post to see it, but it was titled "punch fisting mare" can someone who can open it take a look and make sure it's not violent. I mean a stallion can be a bit rough when entering a mare, but even so unlike a fist a penis even flared doesn't contain bones being slammed in.
Found in the wild, not my vidieo.
We need to keep a record of how many warnings and bans have been done by a mod in a given day. This one should stand for a while, lol!
Dogs constantly pulled back by their hind legs. The second dog is giving many signals asking her to stop.
Incompetent, wrong human like sucking no doubt contributing to the dogs trying to get away all the time.
The last dog is being handled like a brick.
Deleted, warning point give, all people who liked or praised it got one as well. 33 warnings in total. 1 ban due to accumulation of warning points.
After confirmation by another mod the video is underaged. 2 bans then.
Dogs constantly pulled back by their hind legs. The second dog is giving many signals asking her to stop.
Incompetent, wrong human like sucking no doubt contributing to the dogs trying to get away all the time.
The last dog is being handled like a brick.
Deleted, warning point give, all people who liked or praised it got one as well. 33 warnings in total. 1 ban due to accumulation of warning points.
https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/pmv.38997/#post-828887I love PMV like this.
Not stupid cheesy ones that just take a whole scene and just slap some bad music over. I like when someone really edited the vid and makes it sinc up nice. Bonus points for music I'm into.
Let's see if we can start a collection.
Good job.@mntrtwke After reviewing the video in your thread, https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threa...orally-pleasing-her-husky.84305/#post-2085843
It appears to show clear abuse. On top of the fact it is garbage, commercial porn, which usually breeds such abuse to get the shots they "need".
At the beginning of the video, the kissing is fine, but after the cut and the dog suddenly laying down, it all goes downhill. The woman incorrectly strokes his limp penis in the middle of the clip, and the dog becomes more agitated from then on. He actually never shows much interest anywhere in the clip. At the end the dog tries to get up, and to me, appears to even consider going after the woman to give her a firm stop warning while she holds his hind leg to keep it out of her way, and keep him down. The thing that seals the deal for me is after that happens, a man off camera firmly grabs the dog by his front leg, and pulls him back to hold him down. The woman was clearly startled, and probably for good reason, the clip ends there. I wonder why. Couple that with the claims of other users below the post suspecting other things, it's pretty clear.
I've deleted the thread, and issued a 2 point warning.
Real sorry you looked at that too. I just wanted to finish that as fast as possible.@FoxandtheHounds I edited your rather mild ban message.
Fucking zoosadist piece of shit
This stuff boils my blood. A ban is not enough for these fucks though death threats are against the rules.Real sorry you looked at that too. I just wanted to finish that as fast as possible.
Same, and I completely agree. I will not repeat the things I said about it to myself after handling that here. I was going to hop off for a while, but I figured I'd stay incase they got back in.This stuff boils my blood. A ban is not enough for these fucks though death threats are against the rules.
Can get the idea by the users name, but, people, do not feed the troll.Same, and I completely agree. I will not repeat the things I said about it to myself after handling that here. I was going to hop off for a while, but I figured I'd stay incase they got back in.
video
Sorry for that
I will read the rules.