ADreamOfLiberty
ZooVille Philanthropist
You've shown time and again you haven't the faintest idea what I'm saying and if you did you wouldn't know how to criticize it. Go play with the other dolts I'm done pretending to give a shit.
How long do you think that it will take before zoosexaulity starts to become as accepted as other sexualities?
- Thread starter vic21
- Start date
TropicalCritter
Zooville Settler
We will get Groenendaels because Swiss Shepherds is racism.
Bloodwolf
Dumpster Diver
Next to no one knows what you’re saying half the time anyway. Not one of your arguments on the idea are anything more than wishful thinking. Again, until I see someone like you or ZT on something like TED talking over the issue no one is holding their breath.
UR20Z
Dumpster Diver
Only if you're pathetic enough to allow them to do so.
Yeah, it'd be nice, but a few moments of rational consideration will give you the only reasonable conclusion: It ain't happening anytime soon. After the fuckery that the (loudmouthed members of) the alphabet-soup brigade fruitcakes have spread far and wide, I'm expecting that things are on the verge of getting *MUCH* worse for all "non-vanilla" sexualities thanks to their antics. I have little doubt that will spill over onto zoos/beasties, as well. Unlike the wishful thinkers who have hope for anything to improve for us, I'm prepared for it - Nobody IRL (that I'm aware of, anyway) has any inkling that I prefer four-leggers as sexual partners, and I intend for that to remain true.
HugDoggy
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
I don't want parades, I don't need anyone knowing what I do sexually with my lovers or whom those lovers are. The only thing I care about in all this is that should anyone ever find out that my partner is not human that nothing bad happens to them.
I have no doubt they would be emotionally distressed just as much as myself if they were forcibly taken from our home, most likely castrated and there is the possibility that once they are in the system that they might get put down.
When you love someone you should care what happens to them just as much as yourself. If my family never knows I'm a zoo, or I end up in jail, or whatever... That is still preferable to any harm coming to my love, at least I know I live in a society as illogical and twisted as to worry about who is rubbing what against or in whom. My animals don't have any concept of the risks we are taking if someone drives in the front gate unexpectedly while we are enjoying time together. I don't take stupid risks like doing things in an open paddock in the middle of the day. But while it is against the law there is always a risk that is just the world we live in. That fact alone can be draining on the human involved. But it is what it is.
So would I like change? Yes.
Am I expecting change? No.
The vast majority of people have little to do with animals in their day to day lives these days, which I think is part of the problem. So maybe we need to get more engaged with animals generally before we worry about changing their thinking on an animal's mutual sexual desires towards the human in their life.
I have no doubt they would be emotionally distressed just as much as myself if they were forcibly taken from our home, most likely castrated and there is the possibility that once they are in the system that they might get put down.
When you love someone you should care what happens to them just as much as yourself. If my family never knows I'm a zoo, or I end up in jail, or whatever... That is still preferable to any harm coming to my love, at least I know I live in a society as illogical and twisted as to worry about who is rubbing what against or in whom. My animals don't have any concept of the risks we are taking if someone drives in the front gate unexpectedly while we are enjoying time together. I don't take stupid risks like doing things in an open paddock in the middle of the day. But while it is against the law there is always a risk that is just the world we live in. That fact alone can be draining on the human involved. But it is what it is.
So would I like change? Yes.
Am I expecting change? No.
The vast majority of people have little to do with animals in their day to day lives these days, which I think is part of the problem. So maybe we need to get more engaged with animals generally before we worry about changing their thinking on an animal's mutual sexual desires towards the human in their life.
ADreamOfLiberty
ZooVille Philanthropist
Chicken or the egg? The irrational is intrinsically unpredictable.
gumo1970
Zooville Settler
Society choose chicken (laws) and did the first step in terms of non acceptance.
ADreamOfLiberty
ZooVille Philanthropist
Perhaps in the middle ages yes, but it goes in reverse too: Can't change the law without changing people's attitude; but it's very difficult to change people's attitude when you're in the closet, and you can't leave the closet when its against the law (more specifically you can't even run a study to prove non-harm).
1. As long as men make the laws (it won’t be; man kind is threatened by it).
2. A k9 Will can has mounted both woman/man if they assume the position. (Maybe considered acceptable). It’s their instinct that drives them.
3. Whether right or wrong I’ve seen bitches in heat tear up male k9’s). If a male has to lay even a hand on a female dog society would not consider it free choice. As for larger animals I have no idea.
4. Society also has biblical and maybe established moral opinions that may take a generation to alter, if then.
I am just stating my thoughts I am not attempting to flame or upset anyone, however if you sit back give serious thought I do believe I am bring valid points.
2. A k9 Will can has mounted both woman/man if they assume the position. (Maybe considered acceptable). It’s their instinct that drives them.
3. Whether right or wrong I’ve seen bitches in heat tear up male k9’s). If a male has to lay even a hand on a female dog society would not consider it free choice. As for larger animals I have no idea.
4. Society also has biblical and maybe established moral opinions that may take a generation to alter, if then.
I am just stating my thoughts I am not attempting to flame or upset anyone, however if you sit back give serious thought I do believe I am bring valid points.
nekdoneco123
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
been there, had a laugh. i don't understand the "logic" behind this conclusion so many ppl make. no girlfriend = gay, i mean i should have a boyfriend to be gay, no?
DolphinOchWolf
Tourist
I'm surprised that the lowest number of years is not at least 50+ years!
No way would beastiality become accepted the same way homosexual human on human sex is now in less than a century or two...or three... I just can't see it.
No way would beastiality become accepted the same way homosexual human on human sex is now in less than a century or two...or three... I just can't see it.
amorousdog5
Citizen of Zooville
As it turns out the two sentences in my post are related to one another, so responding to one of them individually doesn't make much sense. Here they are together:
You going to fight off the police when they come to take your animals? You might say, keep it a secret! But shit happens, and sometimes secrets get out. If that happens, the folks who don't accept you make it your problem whether you allow it or not. Hell, even if you think you can fight it out with the police and make a mad dash to Brazil, they STILL made it your problem by forcing you to abandon your home.
The acceptance of bestiality is so far away that I can't even give a reasonable estimate for the time frame other than to say not less than a century. I'd even acknowledge that 'never' is a possibility, because it's fully possible humanity nukes itself before it happens. However aside from the major hiccup during the Dark Ages, historically societies have been trending toward more sexual tolerance. Because of this I do think if we have enough time, we'll eventually reach the point where finally nobody gives a shit what other people do behind closed doors.
Franny&Zooey
Citizen of Zooville
I tend to agree with this view. I don't see it being accepted at all...
Zoosexuality will never be accepted because it's wrong. I enjoy watching a good zoo movie but that does not change anything. Even most of the people that think having sex with animals is okay would not stand up in public and say that. If they made a movie with their animal friend, they would not show their face. Why, because even they know it's wrong.
Bloodwolf
Dumpster Diver
For a small portion of us no, we don’t. On the other hand, the knights in armor still believe it will be excepted. They won’t be the ones in the light. Just the fools who bend the knee to the belief.
No, we do not show up because other people think it is wrong and it would make our life more difficult because of them.
Your logic makes no sense.
Bloodwolf
Dumpster Diver
Not at all the reason. If I told you to go storm a room with a 9 full of people and no such bullet soaking steel vest are you going to enter that fatal funnel? You can’t begin to make a case if a bullet to the brain pan is indefinite as soon as someone leaks that out of their trap.
I do not have to. I do not need zoo to be widely accepted, for the most part I do not care at all.
And your reply does not address the nonsense in your first conclusion.
saddlebum66
Supreme Citizen of ZV
Sure. Who were you Yesterday, Bud?
Dogdaddy69
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
NO ONE here, who has a fucking brain that actually functions, is waiting for any of you dipshits to do a single thing for any of us.
We ARE quite happy to sit back and watch the retarded ones burn their lives down though. It's cheap entertainment.
More or less, when someone can't ever get a concept through their thick skull, you just have to let nature do what nature does, thin out the stupid for the benefit of all.
ADreamOfLiberty
ZooVille Philanthropist
You're confusing moral conviction with having such a poor theory of other minds that you're unable to see that they'd rip you apart because they're in the wrong.
MashaSobaka
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
This poll was done pretty badly. Never, 10 years, 50 years, 100 years, 200 years would have been more realistic.
I think the attitude will be completely different in 50 years. It is true that throughout history they have been persecuted for thousands of years, but for thousands of years humanity has barely progressed. Today, even in 30 years, huge developments and changes are taking place.
The fact that today a politician, religious leader, or animal protector wants to ban it does not mean that a child born today who will be a politician, religious leader, or animal protector in 30 years will not partially accept it. Especially today, when young people are born among the LGBT+ flags and woke stuff and any liberant shit.
In addition, communication with animals also develops.
Leniency will probably also depend on the area, it is certain that it will not be the USA where they will start legalizing it. It is too stubborn, naive, hypocritical for that.
Western Europe is much more likely, the attitude there is already much milder and the topic of legalization is raised from time to time, but then they always get knocked down.
In the past, the church also opposed condoms, but in the end they managed to explain in the holy text why it is good. lol
Zoophilia will win over time. We will defeat the enemy like SG-1 defeated the Ori religion.
I think the attitude will be completely different in 50 years. It is true that throughout history they have been persecuted for thousands of years, but for thousands of years humanity has barely progressed. Today, even in 30 years, huge developments and changes are taking place.
The fact that today a politician, religious leader, or animal protector wants to ban it does not mean that a child born today who will be a politician, religious leader, or animal protector in 30 years will not partially accept it. Especially today, when young people are born among the LGBT+ flags and woke stuff and any liberant shit.
In addition, communication with animals also develops.
Leniency will probably also depend on the area, it is certain that it will not be the USA where they will start legalizing it. It is too stubborn, naive, hypocritical for that.
Western Europe is much more likely, the attitude there is already much milder and the topic of legalization is raised from time to time, but then they always get knocked down.
In the past, the church also opposed condoms, but in the end they managed to explain in the holy text why it is good. lol
Zoophilia will win over time. We will defeat the enemy like SG-1 defeated the Ori religion.
Last edited:
saddlebum66
Supreme Citizen of ZV
No thats not what The Church did....they bowed to public pressure that began post WWII, and continued right up to "The Pill" and "D-i-v-o-r-c-e". Contraceptives were illegal in almost all states and many countriesuntil the early Sixties when it became obvious to the church that it was a "cant lick em, so you"d better join them, or Die".... and that was a vast majority of people.This poll was done pretty badly. Never, 10 years, 50 years, 100 years, 200 years would have been more realistic.
I think the attitude will be completely different in 50 years. It is true that throughout history they have been persecuted for thousands of years, but for thousands of years humanity has barely progressed. Today, even in 30 years, huge developments and changes are taking place.
The fact that today a politician, religious leader, or animal protector wants to ban it does not mean that a child born today who will be a politician, religious leader, or animal protector in 30 years will not partially accept it. Especially today, when young people are born among the LGBT+ flags and woke stuff and any liberant shit.
In addition, communication with animals also develops.
In the past, the church also opposed condoms, but in the end they managed to explain in the holy text why it is good. lol
Zoophilia will win over time. We will defeat the enemy like SG-1 defeated the Ori religion.
Unless that sort of 'opportunity' happens in the Zoo world,( and why should it? We're a tiny minority).there will be no readon for the mundane world to rethink this.
beastboyky
Tourist
I think it’ll be a while for sure, it’s mostly people thinking it’s just a kink , or that people are abusing animals etc . I mean look at the one girl who was just caught with her dog (ex saw it on the home camera). They basically accused her of abusing the dog and forcing him. It’s a warped perception people have and they try and throw other labels onto those who practice zoo that harms the reputation. I honestly think more people are zoo than we know , we’re just shamed into hiding .
beastboyky
Tourist
Ah I remember having an argument with someone who told me my dog does not have a soul.
K_9River_rat
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
It's wrong yet you're here and enjoy watching it.
You contradict yourself here.
Why is it wrong? Who or what gets to decide?
There is no right and wrong in the big picture.
Was it wrong that the moon slammed into the Earth?
Or wrong that a volcano blows and kills thousands?
Right and wrong are decided by the participants. If a dog wants to, which rest assured some do indeed initiate sexual conduct with humans having no prior sexual contact with a human or any kind of training in that behavior, and the human he's trying with wants to as well, who in the hell are you or anyone else for that matter to butt in and decide it's wrong?
How about I condemn you for beating off to zoo porn because I think it's wrong?
I wouldn't because I don't believe I should have a say in what you do behind closed doors that isn't hurting anyone or any thing of someone else's, including animals.
