There's so much that we don't understand with genetics. Hell up until crispr we were literally just shooting dna segments at cells hoping something would good would result.as to the level of genetic science and knowledge the whole of the scientific community is at now, we're like children playing with atomic bombs. the WHO and quite a number of genetic research organizations have been warning of such for years now
Covid is just a light scrape. The species barrier and the contagiousness are the big issues there. The virus itself is weak and really overall ineffectual to humans. That 1% mortality rate makes it a joke when it's framed as a "pandemic" virus and is the sole reason why people are even arguing about it in any way.Since covid, I no longer think of this as a likely doomsday scenario. Covid was very contagious, yet to this day the number of total cases is less than 10% of the world population... even with a 100% mortality rate, that wouldn't be enough to cause societal breakdown. Not to mention killing the host reduces the chance for a disease to spread, and you can be damn sure humans would take such a deadly disease way more seriously than even covid.
So in my mind, doomsday by pandemic is out. Doomsday by nuclear war still in play!
Yup. And yet still not strong enough to bring humanity down unless they can find some completely new and unexpected way for it to spread, or it won't infect enough people before we start developing countermeasures. It's hard to say how possible that might be in the future, but for the moment I don't believe humanity has the expertise to engineer such a thing. On the other hand we already have immensely destructive nuclear bombs, each of which can erase millions of lives in a matter of seconds. This is where I'd put my money for doomsday, if not on the gradual destruction of the environment.Anything those crazy fucks invented in bio-warfare is likely to be a 98 or 99% mortality rate.
Ideally, if you have a disease that really can wipe them out. I'm saying I don't think that's currently possible, and I don't know how long it will be until it is. Nukes are already here. Also, even if we're arguing ideally, you don't have to worry about a nuke coming back to your own country and killing all your people after you launch it. You do have to worry about the enemy nukes, though.if attacking a nation with bio-weapons leaves everything intact to take over
Yes they do have biological weapons, but you can't just assume they've all hit 100% mortality rates. But for fun, let's assume they have! Remember what I said about infection rates? Covid was very contagious, but to this day has only infected less than 10% of the world population. Even if one of these engineered diseases has a 100% mortality rate, and can spread as easily as covid (which is less likely as killing the host reduces the chance for spread) it still is not enough to bring down any country.the US has them, Russia, China and probably a number of other nations as well
You really want to compare the healthcare practices of Dark Ages Europe to the modern day?tell that to the flea carrying rats that wiped out 2/3 of the population of Europe
Still, at under 10%, even if they all got sick AT THE SAME TIME (for covid those kinds of numbers took 4 years to accumulate) it wouldn't be enough.For one, getting people seriously ill is worse than killing them, as they require carers, supplies and work, much as seen in Covid
Eh. We are busy conquering the world through pandemics.Hmmmmm let's see how many men mansplained the mysteries of a woman's body today... yikes
All right, I'm willing to have a look. Give me the link.The US and British military did a study and came to the conclusion, air born Anthrax - 1Bk2 could wipe out a full 80 % of the entire population of central and western Europe in less than 1 week
Should probably move this entire post into the dumpster fire where it belongsEh. We are busy conquering the world through pandemics.
Either join and bring pigeon vectors or go
?
It should have been moved there immediately after OP posted.Should probably move this entire post into the dumpster fire where it belongs
iteresting because I asked the AIbot chat about donkey and horses ---- it said they are 95% related and yet they can produce sterile mule but we cant with bonobo chimps ---- its because we are not similar enough in the repreductive systems?we humans are Apes and members of the Great Ape family, we humans share 98.9 % DNA with the Bonobo Chimpanzees
DDAAMMM ... apperantly scinece about women body can only be discovered or talked about by women --- I need my progressive agenda cards to remember those thingsHmmmmm let's see how many men mansplained the mysteries of a woman's body today... yikes
I didnt give it any validation ---- i talked about it as a possibility because you explained it is the differences between species and you were not here to expand on thatNo. the ZP proteins are still species specific. They are 'similar' enough to be cataloged as ZP1, ZP2, ZP3, etc... but they are not the same cross species. Gene expression differences between species make for differing behaviors between the ZP proteins and how they behave and what they will interact with.
It's kinda comical how the moment I bring up ZP2... you just repeating it like its some magic incantation that gives you argument support. You clearly dont understand microbiology, so stop making comments about things that you don't understand.
Here's some advice...
1) Put your dick down...
2) Spend some time researching what proteins are and what they do for a living organism.
3) Spend some time researching human fertilization
4) Spend some time reading up on research literature on differing traits of ZP Proteins between species...
After you have done that... then you can talk about ZP2.
No. the ZP proteins are still species specific. They are 'similar' enough to be cataloged as ZP1, ZP2, ZP3, etc... but they are not the same cross species. Gene expression differences between species make for differing behaviors between the ZP proteins and how they behave and what they will interact with.
It's kinda comical how the moment I bring up ZP2... you just repeating it like its some magic incantation that gives you argument support. You clearly dont understand microbiology, so stop making comments about things that you don't understand.
Here's some advice...
1) Put your dick down...
2) Spend some time researching what proteins are and what they do for a living organism.
3) Spend some time researching human fertilization
4) Spend some time reading up on research literature on differing traits of ZP Proteins between species...
After you have done that... then you can talk about ZP2.
True cursing is not explaining, perhaps people are just over this topic which has been brought up and hashed to death numerous times over the years.many of you didnt say the same thing.... some here just cursed the OP and everyone else --- thats not explanation
Which is exactly what I said with my sperm traffic jam blocking the way comment I said to you.when i tried to discuss -- something intellegent humans do --- the issue I got also stupid answer except from allyfritz and now tammca which by the way both said non human sperm can be somewhat of a contraceptive due to it flooding the vagina and blocking the human sperm
A back and forth requires both people listen to the other's answers carefully, I answered you at 3 very distinct points on the clock, I may not have been as awake and attentive as I could have been on my part if I've missed an actual question you were asking that others had not already answered I'm sorry for that.and in my question to you i asked specific things to really hear your answer because you seemed atleast at the first massage someone to be able to have back and forth
No their sperm does not pass the egg barrier. As others have said some species are similar but none of them are an exact match for a human as far as getting past the egg barrier. (This is where people were getting frustrated with you, as it is a point many have made, some not as politely as others.) Some forms of contraceptive have nothing to do with the egg at all, they work by killing the sperm or making the environment the sperm has to travel through harmful to the sperm. So testing such things on primates for example is valid because their sperm are similar enough that what works on the sperm of that species will also apply to humans. Anything that also coats or blocks access to the eggs outside can also be tested for this reason. But the testing is not being done on these species because their sperm can penetrate into the human egg.then we got about the egg barrier which ally explained there ZP's are not suitable from a dog -- fine, then i went to the AI chat and borught the list of the most similar animals in condition which all the contraceptive pills women take are based on expriements on them so yes it sounds interesting that if you take medicine based on them then does thier sperm passes the egg barier
I guess the problem is on the one hand you seem to want real world answers, but when people say no it can't happen it suddenly becomes hypothetical "well what if it could happen, would it kill the egg." Contraceptives is BIG business you better believe sperm from many different species has been investigated for compatibility and thus provide good test subjects to be exploited by humans.--- this for example is not something that was answered nor discussed previosuly totally based on the topic and science nothing "dellusional" about talking if there is a possible animal that can pass the egg barrier if all our medicine is tried on some of them (apes,monkeys, roudents)
My money is on doomsday by human stupidity first and foremost. The actual tool is just yet to be determined, either we continue to slowly destroy the very environment we need to live or we blow our selves up, it really all works out pretty much of a muchness in the end. Unless we as a species come together and just stop and think.Since covid, I no longer think of this as a likely doomsday scenario. Covid was very contagious, yet to this day the number of total cases is less than 10% of the world population... even with a 100% mortality rate, that wouldn't be enough to cause societal breakdown. Not to mention killing the host reduces the chance for a disease to spread, and you can be damn sure humans would take such a deadly disease way more seriously than even covid.
So in my mind, doomsday by pandemic is out. Doomsday by nuclear war still in play!
True cursing is not explaining, perhaps people are just over this topic which has been brought up and hashed to death numerous times over the years.
no one was pointing it out to me... they just cursed or said "dog sperm can impregnante human egg Stupid" -- which i wasnt even talking about pregnancy i was talking about only passing the egg barrier - so not my fault people dont read because they already want to write something snarkyNo their sperm does not pass the egg barrier. As others have said some species are similar but none of them are an exact match for a human as far as getting past the egg barrier. (This is where people were getting frustrated with you, as it is a point many have made, some not as politely as others.) Some forms of contraceptive have nothing to do with the egg at all, they work by killing the sperm or making the environment the sperm has to travel through harmful to the sperm. So testing such things on primates for example is valid because their sperm are similar enough that what works on the sperm of that species will also apply to humans. Anything that also coats or blocks access to the eggs outside can also be tested for this reason. But the testing is not being done on these species because their sperm can penetrate into the human egg.
I dont see issues with talking in theroy discussing different options --- and ofcourse i personaly dont accept just "no" if I want to know more about the subject (which again - it wasnt just a "no" it was "WHAT ARE YOU HORNY AND STUPID OR SOMETHING??" which is BS response)I guess the problem is on the one hand you seem to want real world answers, but when people say no it can't happen it suddenly becomes hypothetical "well what if it could happen, would it kill the egg."