• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Dog sperm as a way to prevent unwanted pregnancy in women.

Mmmm... troll or idiot... hard to say with this one. The only non-porn comment he has is in another thread just like this one, asking if horses can get women pregnant if we science it enough.
 
danzuna said:
I didnt give it any validation ---- i talked about it as a possibility because you explained it is the differences between species and you were not here to expand on that
Click to expand...
It's not my job to educate you.
What you did was take a piece of information... refuse to actually investigate further on your own... and then make statements about ZP Proteins that if you 'had' researched you would know were incorrect.

danzuna said:
so if a mere discussion about possibilities and bad reading comprehansion triggers you you are going to be an aweful scientist miss ally
Click to expand...
You're making comments that are factually incorrect based on your ignorance on the subject. That's not how science works... so you're definitely not one to tell me or anyone else if they are going to be a good or bad scientist.

danzuna said:
and by the way ---- I asked the AI bot about this, and apperantly you did not explain this well enough maybe take some lessons from the AIbot
Click to expand...

Are you seriously relying on an AI chat bot for your defense...? Seriously?
JFC you are hopeless.

danzuna said:
and before you say "that exactly what I said you just cant read" --- you didnt... you specificly talked about ZP2 and ZP3 being the main issues while the chatbot says --- 1. there are few barries so more protection for the egg , 2. each sperm and egg have thier own unique "coding" which no other known animals have similar to humans.
Click to expand...

I love how you think this is a dunk on me.

This... this right here shows how ignorant you are on the topic. The differences in the ZP proteins between species is exactly "their own unique coding" that your chat bot references. Do you not understand the sentences:
allyfitz said:
The ZP glycoproteins in humans and canines are different.
Click to expand...
allyfitz said:
No. the ZP proteins are still species specific. They are 'similar' enough to be cataloged as ZP1, ZP2, ZP3, etc... but they are not the same cross species. Gene expression differences between species make for differing behaviors between the ZP proteins and how they behave and what they will interact with.
Click to expand...

You have just shown everyone how you are unable to understand what you are told. I've provided you with far more detailed information than your chat bot did.

Your ignorance on the ZP family of proteins in general is why you needed the chatbot to explain that ZP proteins are different because... well... I have no idea why you would be that dense. I told you they are different... I literally said... The ZP glycoproteins in humans and canines are different.

Let me make this crystal clear to you... ZP1, ZP2, ZP3, and ZP4 proteins are... wait for it... different. That is why we name them different things. Shocker I know!!! And on top of that species differences within a single protein makes them... wait for it... different.
I didn't explain this to you like you were a 2 year old because I thought you would have a functional adult brain who would understand that when you are told that two things are different... that you would understand that they are different.


danzuna said:
if you have explained it like that I wouldnt needed to wait untill you elborate on your first comment about this
Click to expand...

First off... how the hell can anyone explain to you that two things are different if when we say "these things are different"... it isn't clear enough for you?
If I tell you that a Pizza and an Airplane are different. Do you need to run to a chatbot to ask it if they are the same?

It's not my job to teach you. I'm more than happy to pass along knowledge and information, but I am not tutoring you. If you or anyone else is curious I expect you/them to do research on your own. I'm more than happy to answer educated questions, but I'm not going to teach people on this forum the basics of microbiology.

Even more so when I have a thread with links that goes into this issue. You are not owed specific and personal comments educating you on this. I've already done a large write-up about it and posted it for everyone to read. It's linked in my signature and you have seen it in -every- reply I've made in this thread. It's even helpfully titled The Actual Science of Canine Male + Human Female gamete interactions

Educate yourself before you tell others they need to be more educated.
 
allyfitz said:
It's not my job to educate you.
What you did was take a piece of information... refuse to actually investigate further on your own... and then make statements about ZP Proteins that if you 'had' researched you would know were incorrect.


You're making comments that are factually incorrect based on your ignorance on the subject. That's not how science works... so you're definitely not one to tell me or anyone else if they are going to be a good or bad scientist.



Are you seriously relying on an AI chat bot for your defense...? Seriously?
JFC you are hopeless.



I love how you think this is a dunk on me.

This... this right here shows how ignorant you are on the topic. The differences in the ZP proteins between species is exactly "their own unique coding" that your chat bot references. Do you not understand the sentences:



You have just shown everyone how you are unable to understand what you are told. I've provided you with far more detailed information than your chat bot did.

Your ignorance on the ZP family of proteins in general is why you needed the chatbot to explain that ZP proteins are different because... well... I have no idea why you would be that dense. I told you they are different... I literally said... The ZP glycoproteins in humans and canines are different.

Let me make this crystal clear to you... ZP1, ZP2, ZP3, and ZP4 proteins are... wait for it... different. That is why we name them different things. Shocker I know!!! And on top of that species differences within a single protein makes them... wait for it... different.
I didn't explain this to you like you were a 2 year old because I thought you would have a functional adult brain who would understand that when you are told that two things are different... that you would understand that they are different.




First off... how the hell can anyone explain to you that two things are different if when we say "these things are different"... it isn't clear enough for you?
If I tell you that a Pizza and an Airplane are different. Do you need to run to a chatbot to ask it if they are the same?

It's not my job to teach you. I'm more than happy to pass along knowledge and information, but I am not tutoring you. If you or anyone else is curious I expect you/them to do research on your own. I'm more than happy to answer educated questions, but I'm not going to teach people on this forum the basics of microbiology.

Even more so when I have a thread with links that goes into this issue. You are not owed specific and personal comments educating you on this. I've already done a large write-up about it and posted it for everyone to read. It's linked in my signature and you have seen it in -every- reply I've made in this thread. It's even helpfully titled The Actual Science of Canine Male + Human Female gamete interactions

Educate yourself before you tell others they need to be more educated.
Click to expand...
Waste of time, ally. The idiot isn't reading any longer than however long it takes to find a sentence it wants to use to make whatever idiot troll comment it wants to make next.

Stand in front of a mirror and argue with yourself, you'll get no less than the same result and most likely, way better. Trolls will be trolls, idiots will idiot. Anyone and every one who has looked at this trash thread knows what this jackoff is. His entire and only future on this site is troll and maybe creepy masturbater on a good day.
 
Last edited:
Dogdaddy69 said:
Waste of time, ally. The idiot isn't reading any longer than however long it takes to find a sentence it wants to use to make whatever idiot troll comment it wants to meake next.
Click to expand...
I am curious what comments he will take and run to his AI Chatbot lover and then rush back with its answer.
That's levels of idiocy I never would have discovered had I not continued talking to him... so at least he's providing new evidence at how pathetic and weaselly people can be.

Taking comments, going to a chatbot and then returning with its answer is a level of intellectual deficiency that's laughable and pitiful at the same time. Intellectually that's about the same level of self-dignity as men paying women on OnlyFans to tell them to crush his balls and then send her proof and more $ a tribute. I wouldn't be surprised if it comes out later that he does that as well.

Dogdaddy69 said:
His entire and only future on this site is troll and maybe creepy masturbater on a good day.
Click to expand...
His entire and only future in life is an ai-chatbot cuck, troll and maybe creepy masturbator on a good day.
FTFY :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
amorousdog5 said:
So what do people think? Troll or idiot? At this point I've got to go with troll.
Click to expand...
why-not-both-why-not.gif


Edit: Oh... I didn't read far enough... you got to that point yourself. haha
amorousdog5 said:
Now that I think about it, why can't it be both?
Click to expand...
 
Oh My...

Is it threatening to consider science as a process, rather than as ratification or "the truth?"

We can do research and disprove concepts. But "proof" is contingent upon a lack of contrary data. We do not know everything and AFAIK such an expectation is unrealistic.

The OP posted an observation: 2 women did not become pregnant after mating with canines.

The OP made a hypothesis: Dog sperm "broke" the egg.

The OP speculated about the value of possible application: A birth control method.

A contrary observation was posted: A woman became pregnant despite mating canines.

@allyfitz provided current technical knowledge contrary to the hypothesis.

I don't know about bullshit, but crocodile dung was once regarded as a form of birth control. Could the OP's observation indicate a possible reduction in the chance of pregnancy from canine mating? Perhaps, although it could also be the multiple humans mating with the women rather than the canine. Perhaps mating with dogs is as effective as crocodile dung.

So many greater concerns need further research that controlled studies are not warranted, IMHO. But can we be grateful for the OP providing the observation, with hope that the OP will inform us should a pregnancy occur in the future?
 
Grateful? No. None of the "information" gathered by the OP is useful because it's purely anecdotal. There's nothing scientific about him having an orgy and then claiming dog semen keeps his wife from getting pregnant. Similarly if he were to report a pregnancy, that would also be a bit of useless anecdotal evidence.

For any useful conclusions to be drawn, there would need to be a legitimate study done under controlled conditions. That's not going to happen because researchers typically have MORE FUCKING COMMON SENSE than to waste time trying to determine if dog semen reduces the chances of pregnancy.
 
BenTheir said:
I don't know about bullshit, but crocodile dung was once regarded as a form of birth control.
Click to expand...
That's great news, next time I'm traveling up north I can ask a crock if he minds me mounting him. Or does the controceptive aspect come with a delayed effect, as in, you are prevented from reproducing ever again because you reached the manure via the bitey end.
 
amorousdog5 said:
Grateful? No. None of the "information" gathered by the OP is useful because it's purely anecdotal. ... For any useful conclusions to be drawn, there would need to be a legitimate study done under controlled conditions.
Click to expand...
Thank you for the clarification.

I see we mean different things when we use the word "science." My "science" provides "best guesses" subject to revision and utilizes a multitude of information formats while adjusting for variances in reliability. The "science" you refer to with conclusive answers and truth is denoted by "scientism" within my vocabulary.
 
WOW you live most men's dream life. I wish I was born female so much, I would of been making the wildest zoo porn regularly. The thought of being impregnated by a dog and carrying puppies is what I dream of lol
 
BenTheir said:
Thank you for the clarification.

I see we mean different things when we use the word "science." My "science" provides "best guesses" subject to revision and utilizes a multitude of information formats while adjusting for variances in reliability. The "science" you refer to with conclusive answers and truth is denoted by "scientism" within my vocabulary.
Click to expand...
That's a very pretty explanation. However science is by definition systematic, whereas anecdotal evidence is by definition not gathered in any systematic way. Therefore what you practice, which allows anecdotal evidence, is not any form of science. Only pseudo-scientific nonsense.

study.com

What is Anecdotal Evidence? | Examples - Video & Lesson Transcript | Study.com

Anecdotal evidence consists of personal observations instead of empirical data. This lesson provides anecdotal evidence examples and discusses the...
study.com study.com
 
BenTheir said:
The "science" you refer to with conclusive answers and truth is denoted by "scientism" within my vocabulary.
Click to expand...
Real science is all about proposing theories and then testing them to proving them false. Real science is open to being challenged by actual data and repeated studies. But you have to come with the proof of what you claim. Challenging a prevailing beliefs with a story someone pulled out of their ass and claiming its real... isn't science... it's someone being an idiot.

If anyone wants to prove an existing scientific believe wrong... bring receipts.
 
ZooAnim said:
My wife can be proof of the effectiveness of this. She's been doing this for a year and hasn't gotten pregnant yet. Our mutual friend. She has been living with us for half a year and uses this method. Both ladies fuck dogs regularly. We also do orgies with lots of guys who fuck my ladies without condoms and flood them with cum. We also did fertility tests on both ladies. Both ladies are fertile and would have no problem getting pregnant.
Click to expand...
really? This is great news and I would take advantage and try this method. If it turns out to be the case I will be very happy
 
ZooAnim said:
There are five of us, two dogs, two women and me a guy. We do it like this: when one of my women starts having a "fertile window" in her menstrual cycle, she's only fucked by two dogs all day. I don't touch her, I don't want my sperm to accidentally impregnate her. (both of my women are not on birth control pills). The dogs take turns fucking her four or six times during this time and flooding her pussy with cum.
On the first day of the "fertility window" of the menstrual cycle, the dog's sperm enters the egg and the dog's sperm briefly inseminates my beloved wife and the wife is sort of "pregnant" with dogs.
However, the chromosomes will not combine and the egg dies and the body removes the egg.
My lovely wife has been off birth control pills for a year.
Because she fucks with two dogs all day on the first day of her "fertility window" of her menstrual cycle, she doesn't get pregnant, and that's great. She after fucking with dogs the next day she's doing with me and four or more guys + she's having an orgy and she hasn't gotten pregnant yet.
It's our patent to keep her clean of chemical birth control pills and not accidentally get pregnant by strangers.
My wife and our mutual friend likes to fuck other men.
And I like it too when she fucks other guys in front of me. The dog's sperm is great because thanks to it my beloved wife and our mutual friend does not get pregnant. The five of us often have an orgy together. Then our mutual friend Viki who lives with us and my wife are fucked by two dogs and me.

Has anyone tried something similar?


View attachment 358201


Click to expand...
Genius?
 
ZooAnim said:
There are five of us, two dogs, two women and me a guy. We do it like this: when one of my women starts having a "fertile window" in her menstrual cycle, she's only fucked by two dogs all day.
View attachment 358201

Click to expand...
I like your theory. But obviously a major trigger. Until now, I have heard several people here claim that the female egg is fertilised for a millisecond before dying. I wonder why proof of this is being hotly disputed. Because the dog is being used for birth control maybe? Personally, I would keep it between myself, my wife and our dog, but that's not the topic.
 
bumpkin said:
I like your theory. But obviously a major trigger. Until now, I have heard several people here claim that the female egg is fertilised for a millisecond before dying. I wonder why proof of this is being hotly disputed. Because the dog is being used for birth control maybe? Personally, I would keep it between myself, my wife and our dog, but that's not the topic.
Click to expand...

Because it's a fantasy, and complete bullshit, being repeated by misguided people.
 
bumpkin said:
Until now, I have heard several people here claim that the female egg is fertilised for a millisecond before dying
Click to expand...
There is several people claiming Earth is flat, they may be right, but no ship is known to be lost by falling on the edge.
bumpkin said:
. I wonder why proof of this is being hotly disputed.
Click to expand...
Cause there is no proof of it happening or not happening. I would think it was possible, but the theory against looks quite more solid at this point. I mean... really. Check the posts.
 
danzuna said:
explain why

because I know after the period where bad eggs are thrown with the blood and new eggs are in the system you get pregnant by the strongest seed who enters first

we already know as a fact that dog sperm inseminate the egg but then it collapses
Click to expand...
One word: DNA..............Human and dog DNA is not compatible, it just is not. That's it..;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top