• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Dog sperm as a way to prevent unwanted pregnancy in women.

well the body's internal heat, will liquify it making it more thin, but that can also be a factor if the human males was to go right after the animal
 
danzuna said:
we are not discussing possibility of pregnancy so we dont care about the mismatch -- actualy if we are talking about contraceptive so having the mismatch is the point we only need the receptor being similar as in this animals below:

AI chatbot:
Some animals have eggs and sperm that are similar to those of humans in terms of structure, physiology, and genetics. These species are commonly used as models for human reproductive research due to their similarities to humans and their ease of manipulation in a laboratory setting. Some examples include:

  • Primates: Primates, including monkeys and apes, have similar eggs and sperm to those of humans and share many physiological and biochemical similarities. This makes primates good models for the study of human reproduction.
  • Domestic animals: Domestic animals, such as cows, pigs, and sheep, also have similar eggs and sperm to those of humans and share many physiological and biochemical similarities. These animals are commonly used for reproductive research and for the production of transgenic animals.
  • Rodents: Rodents, such as mice and rats, have similar eggs and sperm to those of humans and are commonly used as models for human reproductive research due to their short generation time and easy manipulation.
Click to expand...
seeing as you are most likely not educated in these subjects, < not meant to be a put down, just as to a matter of biological science as I stated as a matter of FACT the receptors as you call them are Proteins. again as I stated Birth Control ? NO. just the odds greatly favor the dogs/pigs whatever getting to the human ovum first just in the amount of massive volume of sperm cells over the amount of the huma males
 
so if I take it the meaning to be, will having sex with a dog on a regular bases lower the ODDS, Key Word ODDS of having a male partner successfully impregnating a female ? yes not NO, it's all in the odds
 
TammCa said:
seeing as you are most likely not educated in these subjects, < not meant to be a put down, just as to a matter of biological science as I stared as a matter of FACT the receptors as you call them are Proteins. again as I stated Birth Control ? NO. just the odds greatly favor the dogs/pigs whatever getting to the human ovum first just in the amount of massive volume of sperm cells over the amount of the huma males
Click to expand...
would you think it is possible for one of these animal that are stated (apes, rodents) can cause a false fertilization in a human egg meaning pass the receptor enter the egg and then faile due to difference in DNA?
 
no, even if fusion occurred < and that would be impossible in the Chromosomic make up in itself, it would not be in a biological sense a false fertilization , because no such fertilization has even occurred
 
TammCa said:
no, even if fusion occurred < and that would be impossible in the Chromosomic make up in itself, it would not be in a biological sense a false fertilization , because no such fertilization has even occurred
Click to expand...
if the semen would pass the receptor and enter the egg would that destroy the egg?
 
yes the very moment the sperm cell entered it no gamete would be produced at all
 
a gamete is a haploid cell that fuses with another haploid cell during fertilization
 
so the egg would be useless after that so techniclly if we could find a species that can pass the barrier it could malfunction the healthy eggs
 
would it be possible to introduce some genetic traits from one species to another , such as dog and human female ? Yes it's being done with now and for the past 20 years, hybrid plants and animals, Golden Rice, Tomatoes that are highly frost resistant. farm animals through gene splicing that cause them to mature faster and come to market faster with less feed. so now is the question of ethics, this kind of genetic research with humans is banned in every nation in the world, except China
 
TammCa said:
would it be possible to introduce some genetic traits from one species to another , such as dog and human female ? Yes it's being done with now and for the past 20 years, hybrid plants and animals, Golden Rice, Tomatoes that are highly frost resistant. farm animals through gene splicing that cause them to mature faster and come to market faster with less feed. so now is the question of ethics, this kind of genetic research with humans is banned in every nation in the world, except China
Click to expand...
"just sciencing it" won't happen in our lifetimes, if ever.
 
nekdoneco123 said:
"just sciencing it" won't happen in our lifetimes, if ever.
Click to expand...
it's happening right now, like the Twins born in China that were genetically produced from an altered Genome, the whole team of researcher's were jailed in China for it
 
TammCa said:
would it be possible to introduce some genetic traits from one species to another , such as dog and human female ? Yes it's being done with now and for the past 20 years, hybrid plants and animals, Golden Rice, Tomatoes that are highly frost resistant. farm animals through gene splicing that cause them to mature faster and come to market faster with less feed. so now is the question of ethics, this kind of genetic research with humans is banned in every nation in the world, except China
Click to expand...
i am not talking about creating an hybrid imbryo -- only to pass the receptor --- i want a sperm that could be used to destroy healthy human eggs without creating pregnancy
 
TammCa said:
it's happening right now, like the Twins born in China that were genetically produced from an altered Genome, the whole team of researcher's were jailed in China for it
Click to expand...
were they produced with the help of a completely different species?
 
no BUT cross species genomic manipulation IS possible and could be done with humans as well, it's all in the matter of introducing compatible genes, turning certain genomic gene sets on and others off, it's called Vertical and Horizontal gene splicing
 
some humans are born with tails and some covered in thick hair, these genetic traits exist within our human genome, sometimes due to a mutation these genes are turned on when through the human evolutionary process were turned off
 
because human genitic manipulation is banned in all nations now, even in China, it's not a matter of it cannot be done
 
What can be done with beans and weat can be done to humans. Thing is, it opens a totally unethical door.

On the other hand, placing human traits in other animals/plants has been done and raised some eyebrows already (talking about producing some human protein) Just figure you try to create a dog with an sperm made to bind after human eggs ?
 
SxaBeast said:
Dog and human) such as buffalo and cows can hybridize freely with fertile offspring. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bovid_hybrid

See also coyote/wolf/dog
Click to expand...
Goattobeloved said:
Also horses and donkeys even if their chromosome count does not match
Click to expand...
Yes. You are both correct here. But both examples are within the same species , I mentioned horses and donkeys, but not cows and buffalo.

Canis and bovinus.

I'm pretty sure too you can add Yaks and Water Buffalo and Oxen to ranks that can be cross-bred with cows as well. It would most likely take lab conditions due to size differences, but you could also add Chihuahua and Wolf to the list of animals in the cross-breeding possibles as well. For that matter, Teacup Poodles

To piggyback off of @SxaBeast linked material, I type hybrid biology into the search bar and got the following page.

en.m.wikipedia.org

Hybrid (biology) - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org

And below, from the above link, I lifted via cut and paste the entire 2nd paragraph from that page.

Species are reproductively isolated by strong barriers to hybridisation, which include genetic and morphological differences, differing times of fertility, mating behaviors and cues, and physiological rejection of sperm cells or the developing embryo. Some act before fertilization and others after it. Similar barriers exist in plants, with differences in flowering times, pollen vectors, inhibition of pollen tube growth, somatoplastic sterility, cytoplasmic-genic male sterility and the structure of the chromosomes. A few animal species and many plant species, however, are the result of hybrid speciation, including important crop plants such as wheat, where the number of chromosomes has been doubled.

In my cut and paste, the bolding is NOT mine, but represents Hot Links from that page to those specific topics.

There is also plenty of circumstantial and recently, physical evidence of Modern Human and Neanderthal hybridization/cross-breeding.

Further, if you follow such information, you may have seen speculation in recent years after the discovery of fully intact Mammoth remains in Siberia of reviving the Mammoth species. Though if I remember correctly, the talk wasn't primarily of hybridizing but of straight up geneticly replacing the DNA in an elephant egg with Mammoth DNA and using an Elephant cow to bring the revived Mammoth baby to term. I didn't dig down into the technology of that but that's the general gist of it.
 
TammCa said:
we/ Genetic science knows just enough about genetic gene splicing to be VERY dangerous. in my opinion it should ALL be banned until more is known about it and it's possible effects in the long term
Click to expand...
Some idiot somewhere will do it because it can be done, full speed into the brick wall because...........

I think you're right. A very very bad idea, but as a species, we do seem bent on self-destruction, and I'm pretty sure science that can be done will be the method that accomplishes that. Because we are too stupid to heed the "Should not be done" concept.
 
knotjen said:
Many seem to consider humans to be "top" of the food chain, the highest order of being, etc.

I think our arrogance as a species puts us a lot closer to the bottom.
Click to expand...
and many have no idea that the human genome is not even close to being the most complex, a banana has a more complex genome than a human
 
knotjen said:
Many seem to consider humans to be "top" of the food chain, the highest order of being, etc.

I think our arrogance as a species puts us a lot closer to the bottom.
Click to expand...
I've argued this before, and I continue to see things this way..........

Man, with tools and technology is an apex predator and the top of the food chain.

Man with no tools or tech is a walking steak sandwich.
 
LOL yea kinda put's a new prospective on just where the human race rates, LOL
 
I attended a week long seminar on this very subject, it is possible to unleash a viral pathogen that could be totally detrimental to the human species as a whole, VERY dangerous territory
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top