• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Count to ∞!

140940

however most people in the general society look at pedophilia as only 10 degrees worse than bestiality is.

140945

I literally listened to a podcast who was talking about zooier than thou and said "only thing worse than an animal fucker is a kiddie fucker" ... It really blows to be mentioned in the same breath. I of course 100% agree about that consent is possible with a dog but not with children. Only psychos think otherwise. But that label people put on Zoos is realllllly hard to wash off.
 
140946
It really blows to be mentioned in the same breath.
Unfortunately it doesn't surprise me at all. While I have no qualms nor disgust about myself engaging in bestiality with my canines, I do understand that it's behavior that ~90-95% of people are going to absolutely feel disgusted and horrified by. Pretty much the thought that someone they know, someone they love, or someone they consider a friend engaging in, quite frankly, such abnormal behavior, is just something that most people don't think about and surely not with someone they know. Most people don't want to learn alternative points of view when it comes to such a taboo subject. Just as I myself would not take a pedophile's word that the sex he/she/they engage in is non-harmful. Pretty much their mind is made up that animals do not possess the capability to consent to sex, and the only reason the animal themselves engage in sex is purely due to "instincts."

Just as the typical imagined picture of a pedophile looks like some skinny, greasy dude with a thin mustache and no muscle mass (you're picturing him now aren't you? And let me guess, his name is Chester the molester?) Most people think of a zoophile as some fat, greasy, slob with a seriously straggly neck beard that can't get laid. So he takes his sexual frustration out on animals as a simple relief mechanism.

Luckily we do have evidence on our side that bestiality isn't harmful to the animal in all cases, as long as the animal consents and as long as the animal in question calls ALL the shots about the matter. Unfortunately we're working against human ignorance, and human ignorance is something that this species is not in short supply of. As nihilistic as this may sound, I believe that human ignorance is not something we, as a species, are able to overcome. I believe that those which detest zoophilia and bestiality will always outnumber those that engage in it or support it. As history shows this to be the case time and time again. We're freaks and outliers to them.
 
140971

Thank you Dane, always the gentleman ?

Most people think of a zoophile as some fat, greasy, slob with a seriously straggly neck beard that can't get laid. So he takes his sexual frustration out on animals as a simple relief mechanism.
If they actually Google bestiality and made Google show them pictures, that view should change. As most pictures coming up are of rather attractive female humans that hints of, or show them having sex with dogs.

But it is very much a sexist view about it even when no truths about affection for animals have been told. A dog going for some sniffs in the crotch of a woman will not cause many to turn their heads, same thing can't be said if the dog do it do a man. Dog smelling on a woman is seen as innocent while a dog smelling on a man could make some think "what have he done with the dog for it to act like that?", even if they are miles away from thinking of it to be zoophile stuff.
But men can scratch their own crotch without people starting to look, so you get some "Oh, that is totally innocent" thoughts.
________________________________________________

For @caboose https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/dog-paws.6438/post-2291887
 
140972
A dog going for some sniffs in the crotch of a woman will not cause many to turn their heads, same thing can't be said if the dog do it do a man. Dog smelling on a woman is seen as innocent while a dog smelling on a man could make some think "what have he done with the dog for it to act like that?", even if they are miles away from thinking of it to be zoophile stuff.
I've had to explain many times, that somebody who identifies others by scent probably wants to know you at your stinkiest.

I used to wonder what my favourite part of a dog was (no, vaginas didn't count for this). I'd think, "Paws are great. Leathery pads, short soft fur, claws good enough for a scratch but not enough to tear.", then I'd think, "Ears are better though. Alert and mobile. Practical yet stylish.", then I'd think, "Fangs are pretty cool though. They've got that dangerous look but can be used to gently", and this would go on for hours.

In the end I had to conclude that while every part of them is beautiful, they really are a masterpiece ensemble.
 
140973
I've had to explain many times, that somebody who identifies others by scent probably wants to know you at your stinkiest.
Just another proof of humans not being as intelligent and knowledgeable as they think they are.
In the end I had to conclude that while every part of them is beautiful, they really are a masterpiece ensemble.
Absolutely!
 
Back
Top