140943
?
?
M
MrsShemon
Guest
140944
Take care ya'all, I'll get back to you once I have enough pictures of cute dog legs/paws to make a thread (or post in one of we already have such a thread)
Take care ya'all, I'll get back to you once I have enough pictures of cute dog legs/paws to make a thread (or post in one of we already have such a thread)
caboose
Citizen of Zooville
140945
I literally listened to a podcast who was talking about zooier than thou and said "only thing worse than an animal fucker is a kiddie fucker" ... It really blows to be mentioned in the same breath. I of course 100% agree about that consent is possible with a dog but not with children. Only psychos think otherwise. But that label people put on Zoos is realllllly hard to wash off.
140946
Just as the typical imagined picture of a pedophile looks like some skinny, greasy dude with a thin mustache and no muscle mass (you're picturing him now aren't you? And let me guess, his name is Chester the molester?) Most people think of a zoophile as some fat, greasy, slob with a seriously straggly neck beard that can't get laid. So he takes his sexual frustration out on animals as a simple relief mechanism.
Luckily we do have evidence on our side that bestiality isn't harmful to the animal in all cases, as long as the animal consents and as long as the animal in question calls ALL the shots about the matter. Unfortunately we're working against human ignorance, and human ignorance is something that this species is not in short supply of. As nihilistic as this may sound, I believe that human ignorance is not something we, as a species, are able to overcome. I believe that those which detest zoophilia and bestiality will always outnumber those that engage in it or support it. As history shows this to be the case time and time again. We're freaks and outliers to them.
Unfortunately it doesn't surprise me at all. While I have no qualms nor disgust about myself engaging in bestiality with my canines, I do understand that it's behavior that ~90-95% of people are going to absolutely feel disgusted and horrified by. Pretty much the thought that someone they know, someone they love, or someone they consider a friend engaging in, quite frankly, such abnormal behavior, is just something that most people don't think about and surely not with someone they know. Most people don't want to learn alternative points of view when it comes to such a taboo subject. Just as I myself would not take a pedophile's word that the sex he/she/they engage in is non-harmful. Pretty much their mind is made up that animals do not possess the capability to consent to sex, and the only reason the animal themselves engage in sex is purely due to "instincts."
Just as the typical imagined picture of a pedophile looks like some skinny, greasy dude with a thin mustache and no muscle mass (you're picturing him now aren't you? And let me guess, his name is Chester the molester?) Most people think of a zoophile as some fat, greasy, slob with a seriously straggly neck beard that can't get laid. So he takes his sexual frustration out on animals as a simple relief mechanism.
Luckily we do have evidence on our side that bestiality isn't harmful to the animal in all cases, as long as the animal consents and as long as the animal in question calls ALL the shots about the matter. Unfortunately we're working against human ignorance, and human ignorance is something that this species is not in short supply of. As nihilistic as this may sound, I believe that human ignorance is not something we, as a species, are able to overcome. I believe that those which detest zoophilia and bestiality will always outnumber those that engage in it or support it. As history shows this to be the case time and time again. We're freaks and outliers to them.
140948
Hello Adder, is your arch nemesis named Subtractor? Lol
Hello Adder, is your arch nemesis named Subtractor? Lol
140949
1 foeddy 9 fiddy
Adder
Tourist
Do not mention that name! All my good work is undone by that... thing!
I actually got the name from a show called "the black adder" which I found mildly funny.
140952
140953
I see!
I see!
140954
Adder
Tourist
140955
Thanks for asking, I was wondering how long it would take.
1409 56k modem
140958
140959
littlestmeow
Tourist
140960
There are some interesting things to read in this thread, it's a really good time killer
There are some interesting things to read in this thread, it's a really good time killer
140961
Indeed, this thread is like 40% random sporadic conversations, 10% waves ?, and 50% numbers. Lol
Indeed, this thread is like 40% random sporadic conversations, 10% waves ?, and 50% numbers. Lol
140963
?
??
?
? ?
?
??
?
? ?
1409 double 6
One foot to show off his new J's, the other foot for Onlyfans!
One foot to show off his new J's, the other foot for Onlyfans!
140968 ?
Only yips ?
Only yips ?
M
MrsShemon
Guest
140969
I'll guess I just smut and say what I want to say in the next post so people don't react to stupid words instead of a pic.
I'll guess I just smut and say what I want to say in the next post so people don't react to stupid words instead of a pic.
M
MrsShemon
Guest
140971
Thank you Dane, always the gentleman ?
But it is very much a sexist view about it even when no truths about affection for animals have been told. A dog going for some sniffs in the crotch of a woman will not cause many to turn their heads, same thing can't be said if the dog do it do a man. Dog smelling on a woman is seen as innocent while a dog smelling on a man could make some think "what have he done with the dog for it to act like that?", even if they are miles away from thinking of it to be zoophile stuff.
But men can scratch their own crotch without people starting to look, so you get some "Oh, that is totally innocent" thoughts.
________________________________________________
For @caboose https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/dog-paws.6438/post-2291887
Thank you Dane, always the gentleman ?
If they actually Google bestiality and made Google show them pictures, that view should change. As most pictures coming up are of rather attractive female humans that hints of, or show them having sex with dogs.
But it is very much a sexist view about it even when no truths about affection for animals have been told. A dog going for some sniffs in the crotch of a woman will not cause many to turn their heads, same thing can't be said if the dog do it do a man. Dog smelling on a woman is seen as innocent while a dog smelling on a man could make some think "what have he done with the dog for it to act like that?", even if they are miles away from thinking of it to be zoophile stuff.
But men can scratch their own crotch without people starting to look, so you get some "Oh, that is totally innocent" thoughts.
________________________________________________
For @caboose https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/dog-paws.6438/post-2291887
YIMBY
Tourist
140972
In the end I had to conclude that while every part of them is beautiful, they really are a masterpiece ensemble.
I've had to explain many times, that somebody who identifies others by scent probably wants to know you at your stinkiest.
I used to wonder what my favourite part of a dog was (no, vaginas didn't count for this). I'd think, "Paws are great. Leathery pads, short soft fur, claws good enough for a scratch but not enough to tear.", then I'd think, "Ears are better though. Alert and mobile. Practical yet stylish.", then I'd think, "Fangs are pretty cool though. They've got that dangerous look but can be used to gently", and this would go on for hours.
In the end I had to conclude that while every part of them is beautiful, they really are a masterpiece ensemble.