2022 Sigmund Freud University Vienna Zoophilia Study.

[HugDoggy]

I'm not zoo myself, but I support zoos, as long as they treat their pets with love and respect. I think zoosexuality finally must be accepted by society! So I am not sure if I should participate in this survey!

I think the survey was really aimed at zoos, so I'm not sure if input from a zoo ally would be beneficial to the research. Although it is great you are accepting of the sexuality. One little thing though, most zoos would not refer to the special animal in their life as a "pet" The tend to be imbued with more human terms like companion, friend, lover etc.

 

[vectorized]

The study was a little heavy on Google translate but other than that wasn't too much of a hassle. Took a bit of reflection to answer truthfully.

 

[wicsy]

Liked the ability to answer with my own words! And the last questions are quite standard in most professional surverys as far as I know and used to verify that the responding person isn’t clicking at random

 

[Hannibalpaar]

Okay, we have now declared if our sex life is influenced by powerful others, if we feel guilty about our sex life and if we are taking risks LIKE A THOUSAND TIMES - EACH OF US.

 

[varamiespal]

I feel like I answered a good chunk of questions more than once. The language of some questions was slightly altered; but ultimately asking the same thing. It got tiring the longer I took the study.

Its measuring psychological curve. Measures ones state of mind and consistency by asking same things multiple times with different variations. Used a lot in psychology and when raking for potential leaders in mass of groups.

 

[vin5783]

Just finished it. Tried not to overthink the questions, as some of it I couldn't tell was a translation thing or if I wasn't quite reading it just right. But overall, I hope it helps to shine a light that zoos are just as valid as other forms of sexuality.

 

[insidetheEquine]

Its measuring psychological curve. Measures ones state of mind and consistency by asking same things multiple times with different variations. Used a lot in psychology and when raking for potential leaders in mass of groups.

That actually makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the input!

 

[justalurker22]

I found a lot of the questions were rather shallow.

 

[fendt2]

Thank you for sharing!

 

[Porcelaine]

I found the questions and available answers in this study very engaging and interesting, seems much better than a lot of the studies I've looked at so far. It never felt like I was some kind of lab rat being examined, lol.

 

[FunnyMonkey]

Thank You very much for sharing with Us

 

[Nuri]

The University of Sigmund Freud University Vienna is conducting an anonymous zoophilia study using an online survey that will take no more than 30 minutes to complete.

Here is the link: https://onlinebefragungen.sfu.ac.at/Zoophilia2023/

Research staff:

Birgit U. Stetina
Armin Klaps
Lisa Emmett - Lead Researcher

Zooville.org has been in conversation and has verified that the study is legitimate with a proper letter of intent of using this forum as a survey base. If possible, we highly suggest that you conduct the survey as truthfully as possible and within your margins of personal anonymity. Scientific research into our sexual orientation is always welcomed, and I am glad to have aided them in opening up Zooville to them.

The Letter of Intent is posted below.

View attachment 360716

Best Regards,
ZTHorse

Definitely a few repeats in the questions. Answered honestly

 

[DangerManger]

I believe the repeated answers, being slightly reworded, is to capture your train of thought because you may respond one way to a certain question than you would another even though you may already know it's the "same" question. Also some of the questions definitely were a certain answer, but when asked a slightly different way I answered differently.

Took me about half an hour, definitely a better aimed one than the others I've taken.

 

[Marshall_The_Husky]

The University of Sigmund Freud University Vienna is conducting an anonymous zoophilia study using an online survey that will take no more than 30 minutes to complete.

Here is the link: https://onlinebefragungen.sfu.ac.at/Zoophilia2023/

Research staff:

Birgit U. Stetina
Armin Klaps
Lisa Emmett - Lead Researcher

Zooville.org has been in conversation and has verified that the study is legitimate with a proper letter of intent of using this forum as a survey base. If possible, we highly suggest that you conduct the survey as truthfully as possible and within your margins of personal anonymity. Scientific research into our sexual orientation is always welcomed, and I am glad to have aided them in opening up Zooville to them.

The Letter of Intent is posted below.

View attachment 360716

Best Regards,
ZTHorse

Awesome! Thanks for the informations!

 

[ukhscvhe]

Niiice! Definitely giving this a go!

 

[Suvrenim]

It timed out on me, also it could do with clarification on the population questions. thats as far as i got

 

[black_knot]

done. some questions were a bit weird and i often didn't know what to answer exactly but i tried my best

 

[MagicPup]

Interesting study. A lot of questions about our satisfaction with our sex life, mental problems/general problems in relation to our sex life, and our sexuality with animals possibly affecting our mentality towards sex as a whole. Unsure of what they're trying to look into here, curious to see what comes of this.

 

[TammCa]

I wonder if Lisa has personal experience in any of that Zoo activity, as being the lead researcher

 

[AppleDash]

I wonder if Lisa has personal experience in any of that Zoo activity, as being the lead researcher

Why should the lead researcher having personal experience? Maybe a nice fantasy for forum members here, but also this kind of remark could totally invalidate whatever data this project will generate as the scrambled thoughts of some apologist.

 

[Kalashnislav]

Do we know when we are supposed to the get the results?

 

[murklak]

I really hate when the same question is asked over and over again, with maybe just one word diffirence than the last question... How many times can one answer "I don't want a STD"? xD

 

[Renee]

I really hate when the same question is asked over and over again, with maybe just one word diffirence than the last question... How many times can one answer "I don't want a STD"? xD

Exactly my thinking! That part was so repetitive!

As for powerful people affecting my sex life, yes. The women that say no/ are not into my fetishes / reject me because of it. I'd say THEY have power. No other powerful people though..... No space lizards or shamans, or masons, etc.....

 

[Miss_Rachel]

I do appreciate that some users on here worry about their continued safety and anonymity, but I would assure anyone who has not taken part do so. We, where we live, care very much for our closeted existence, as well as our security in the wider world. Saying that, we thought it worthwhile to take part. If we are going to spread the word and lend support to those in similar circumstances, then it is worth "educating" the non-zoo world. We are not monsters or abusers, we care deeply, possibly more so than normal pet owners, for our companions, and it needs to be said and clearly understood.

 

[eye_spy_you]

As this was the first thing I did joining the forum it felt like a screening process. Looking over my answers, it was nice to see I'm a non-sex addict that's happy with their sexuality.

 

[ApogeeSolstice]

I'm so happy to see legitimate studies being performed.

 

[ApogeeSolstice]

I do appreciate that some users on here worry about their continued safety and anonymity, but I would assure anyone who has not taken part do so. We, where we live, care very much for our closeted existence, as well as our security in the wider world. Saying that, we thought it worthwhile to take part. If we are going to spread the word and lend support to those in similar circumstances, then it is worth "educating" the non-zoo world. We are not monsters or abusers, we care deeply, possibly more so than normal pet owners, for our companions, and it needs to be said and clearly understood.

Here here!

 

[Un Grand Loup]

Done, but it's almost all the same questions as usual...

 

[Selsharesthan]

This is an extremely biased study. It clearly implies that Zoos are flawed or mentally disturbed in some way. Like what's up with the questions about becoming characters in a novel? Are they wondering if we're schizophrenic or delusional? I got around 65% of the way through the test and quit. I recommend no one else participate.

 

[Goattobeloved]

This is an extremely biased study. It clearly implies that Zoos are flawed or mentally disturbed in some way. Like what's up with the questions about becoming characters in a novel? Are they wondering if we're schizophrenic or delusional? I got around 65% of the way through the test and quit. I recommend no one else participate.

I understand they assume there may be a correlation between zoos, abuse, mental issues, and the study is trying to determinate if that is based.

Honestly, be it cause or consequence, there IS (like in every large group) a number of insane persons in it, schizophenic included, but many depresion and what not. In many cases the animals come as a close, honest relationship (some may call it substitutive, I would not).

Still, possibly by its own nature, nothing comparable with the furry fandom when it comes to insanity types piled together.

Thing is... If the "sane" people here do not participate, and the only input is from the rest. What do you think the study portrait will show? ?