• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

2022 Sigmund Freud University Vienna Zoophilia Study.

Status
Not open for further replies.
pes said:
That is intentional. It allows the researchers to compare answers to the "same" questions and derive whether the person is serious about it and so on.
Click to expand...
I feel like I am serious, but I start second guessing or even rethinking scenarios that have played out in the past, kind of giving a false answer by accident.
 
Mcflurrybuttz said:
I feel like I am serious, but I start second guessing or even rethinking scenarios that have played out in the past, kind of giving a false answer by accident.
Click to expand...
I think research of this type is aware of this issue and counts with it.
 
pes said:
I think research of this type is aware of this issue and counts with it.
Click to expand...
I hope so, I am really bad over thinker to the extent that I feel like I have to start drawing out logic diagrams to make it make sense to other people and even myself at times.
 
insidetheEquine said:
I feel like I answered a good chunk of questions more than once. The language of some questions was slightly altered; but ultimately asking the same thing. It got tiring the longer I took the study.
Click to expand...
Yesss, now I'm feeling tired from this study :/
 
Just filled it out. I wonder how the study will be used, does anyone know if the results have been published, or if there's been a paper based on the results published?
 
I'm wondering how skewed the study is going to be. Surely there will be a ton of trolls clicking the worst answers trying to give us a bad rep, so really what is this study actually accomplishing? I'm not to sure
 
Combat Wombat said:
I'm wondering how skewed the study is going to be. Surely there will be a ton of trolls clicking the worst answers trying to give us a bad rep, so really what is this study actually accomplishing? I'm not to sure
Click to expand...
I wouldn't have thought trolls would have the patience to do such a long survey and what would they hope to gain unless a LOT of trolls did the survey, in most cases outliers are pruned from such research a lot of the time. Preferring to focus more on the mass of respondents under the middle of the bell curve, as I more representative of the set being examined.
 
Came across this somehow when browsing the site, decided to join and complete the survey. Other than making me question the overall state of my mental health, it was alright. As someone who has taken, and seen survey design, the repetitive questions were absolutely on purpose. If you answered "bad" for one "neutral" on another and "positive" on the same 3 questions, the people who run the study know they can discard your responses because you clearly weren't reading the questions.
 
Max13 said:
Came across this somehow when browsing the site, decided to join and complete the survey. Other than making me question the overall state of my mental health, it was alright. As someone who has taken, and seen survey design, the repetitive questions were absolutely on purpose. If you answered "bad" for one "neutral" on another and "positive" on the same 3 questions, the people who run the study know they can discard your responses because you clearly weren't reading the questions.
Click to expand...
I just completed the survey as well- and while yes, some questions were focused on weeding out bad results- there were others that had nuances to them. Maybe that was just the translation though... kinda tough to take a survey in a different language.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top