Fists of Furry
Tourist
Now that just makes me think of Zelda. If Link is as kinky as Epona's dad, I like thinking about what he does with her when he's not off saving Zelda.
Zoophilia in history
- Thread starter ZTHorse
- Start date
Fists of Furry
Tourist
I have gotten off to this sculpture so many times. No lie.
KurodaMiharu
Tourist
Now I love The Legend of Zelda even more <3. Epona is such a wonderful horse
S
ShadowFox88
Guest
Epona is not Greek. She is a Goddess of the Gauls, which were the French Celts. But, yes, her legend involves her father mating with a Celestial Mare.
Polarfoxes
Tourist
I'm super curious to find out what the earliest known erotic depiction of canine genitalia is. Both of the canine penis, and the canine vulva.
Preferably not depictions of the animals engaged in sex with a human* but rather any art made in sexual admiration of the animal itself, or its genitals. True zoophilia.
*because the dog might be there for a degradation aspect rather than zoophilia, though if it contains an accurate canine penis with knot, or anatomically correct canine vulva I'd still be interested
Some imaginary lost artworks I've imagined:
- a prehistoric wooden or clay sculpture of a dog cock that was made for and used as a dildo
- prehistoric lascaux-like cave painting of a female dog with legs spread, vulva big and in heat, drawn near ground-level where the artist could sit and masturbate to it
- sketches of dog porn hidden among the personal belongings of a 19th century illustrator who was secretly a zoophile
- solo dog porn existing in some 18th century Japanese erotic shunga print
These two shunga prints from 1837, which were mentioned earlier in the thread, contain an accurate canine penis with the knot and shape correct. Though it's not erotic, the earliest depiction of any kind of a dog's penis I've managed to find is this Black Desert petroglyph dating to the 1st millenium BCE, found in this PDF on page 91.
What are some early erotic depictions of canine genitalia you're aware of, or can find?
Preferably not depictions of the animals engaged in sex with a human* but rather any art made in sexual admiration of the animal itself, or its genitals. True zoophilia.
*because the dog might be there for a degradation aspect rather than zoophilia, though if it contains an accurate canine penis with knot, or anatomically correct canine vulva I'd still be interested
Some imaginary lost artworks I've imagined:
- a prehistoric wooden or clay sculpture of a dog cock that was made for and used as a dildo
- prehistoric lascaux-like cave painting of a female dog with legs spread, vulva big and in heat, drawn near ground-level where the artist could sit and masturbate to it
- sketches of dog porn hidden among the personal belongings of a 19th century illustrator who was secretly a zoophile
- solo dog porn existing in some 18th century Japanese erotic shunga print
These two shunga prints from 1837, which were mentioned earlier in the thread, contain an accurate canine penis with the knot and shape correct. Though it's not erotic, the earliest depiction of any kind of a dog's penis I've managed to find is this Black Desert petroglyph dating to the 1st millenium BCE, found in this PDF on page 91.
What are some early erotic depictions of canine genitalia you're aware of, or can find?
You think the reason it's such a common theme is that we're very low on the predator scale and are clearly terrified of predators, based on our history of hunting so many species to extinction and our fascination with predator "attacks" on humans, as if the aberration was the attack and not the species that has decided it's too special to belong to a food chain?
I'd think that, historically, animals would represent a strength that we would see as "supernatural"/mythical or at least superhuman, and that, in a time where humanity still shared its world with powerful animals, the "super-human" would logically be an animal-human hybrid. The anthropocentric view of the world has removed natural life from our culture enough that we imagine humans with powers because we don't think of animals as powerful anymore. We take credit for all the work done by oil as if it was done by our own hand, making the speed of a cheetah less and less impressive.
When you think about it, it's this life -one species living in the absence of uninvited natural life- that's the anomaly. This has never happened before, is fundamentally unsustainable, and will come crashing down without people noticing... because it's already started and we've decided it's a political issue. That's how far removed we are from reality. The natural world is collapsing under our weight and at least half of us still haven't noticed.
I'm betting that part of our mutualistic relationship with dogs, going back before "civilization", would be as a consequence-free sex partner. The shape of the dog penis is so perfect for stimulating the human vagina, it's almost as if dogs were bred for this. I'm talking 10k-15k years ago, when sex wasn't taboo and people shared everything in their tribes because they literally needed to trust each other with their lives every single day. I'm not sure how we can know these things with any certainty, but in the book Sapiens, the author talks about women being bred by multiple partners at the same time out of the belief you could combine more than two sets of genes.
In a world where resources are scarce and competition is fierce and violent, and in a time before vibrators or netflix, you can see where "fucking the dog" would be part of life. Necessity is the mother of invention and the human brain hasn't changed fundamentally in at least 30k years.
I'm also guessing that more people are engaging in acts of bestiality with the pandemic because our lives are more closely mimicking how we lived in caves. I doubt it will ever become mainstream or openly discussed, but I do wonder how much more prevalent zoosexuality will be. Between their tongues, penises, etc. I doubt it's a happy accident that everything fits so well. We've lived with dogs for too long for there to not be some sexual selection pressure there, assuming ancient humans had sex with animals but I think we'd be laughably naïve to think that zoosexuality is new. There's a reason your nostrils are big enough for your finger but your ears aren't; nothing in nature that is preserved over time is accidental and there would need to be a clear benefit for humans to share their living space with dogs. I'd actually be surprised if there wasn't a direct connection: you'd be more likely to feed a dog that fucks you well than one that doesn't and we've been living with and breeding these animals so long we don't know when it started. If it hasn't always been a thing, it wouldn't be a thing.
In a world where resources are scarce and competition is fierce and violent, and in a time before vibrators or netflix, you can see where "fucking the dog" would be part of life. Necessity is the mother of invention and the human brain hasn't changed fundamentally in at least 30k years.
I'm also guessing that more people are engaging in acts of bestiality with the pandemic because our lives are more closely mimicking how we lived in caves. I doubt it will ever become mainstream or openly discussed, but I do wonder how much more prevalent zoosexuality will be. Between their tongues, penises, etc. I doubt it's a happy accident that everything fits so well. We've lived with dogs for too long for there to not be some sexual selection pressure there, assuming ancient humans had sex with animals but I think we'd be laughably naïve to think that zoosexuality is new. There's a reason your nostrils are big enough for your finger but your ears aren't; nothing in nature that is preserved over time is accidental and there would need to be a clear benefit for humans to share their living space with dogs. I'd actually be surprised if there wasn't a direct connection: you'd be more likely to feed a dog that fucks you well than one that doesn't and we've been living with and breeding these animals so long we don't know when it started. If it hasn't always been a thing, it wouldn't be a thing.
haha what a massively inconvenient sexual orientation. I pity the swan zoos
allyfitz
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
ive thought this for a while now. If you go back to the paleolithic times, there would have been a few alpha males that would have their pick of the women, and they'd want to make sure any children were theirs. So how would he keep his women satisfied and less willing to fuck other men in the tribe? Well, if he lets them fuck the dogs whenever they want, and they're able to get satisfied from that... they'd probably rather do that than risk cheating with another man possibly being caught and being thrown out of their high status position as the alpha's woman.
Back in the day being thrown out from such a position would probably mean death, as the rest of the men would also not want to have anything to do with you because of fear you'd pull the same shit on them. Back then life was brutal. A woman wouldnt want to fuck up a good situation by fucking another guy in the tribe if she has her mans blessing to fuck the dogs whenever she wants.
Also, its interesting to note that copulative tying is very uncommon in nature. I mean it makes sense... while you're tied... you're not very effective at defending yourself. From what I've read this is generally why it's so uncommon among species.
And interestingly among wild canids, the knots are smaller and the ties are shorter. So why the difference?
I've wondered if domesticated dogs one of the breeding benefits of dogs among prehistoric man didn't also have an impact on knot size.
Because you're right... its so unnaturally good at pleasing a woman. For the chieftain or whoever, if you know one of your male dogs pleasures your women more than the others... you might consider breeding him instead of the others for offspring. It wont make much of a difference immediately, but over 10,000 years it will.
Why would large knots have evolved in domesticated dogs to such a degree when large knots not something we see among wild Canids.
Wombat_intl
Tourist
One of the things I learned when I was involved with one a university admin back in the day is that up to 85 percent of books, art and research material held at campus libraries are not available to student or the public. If you want to see any of it you have to file a request and approval. Since my admin was into bestiality she occasionaly had to join her in the restricted tombs to go through some of it. I could have gone through it for months and not view all of that they had on the subject.
allyfitz
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
When I was in university (last year), I ran into this a few times when needing to do research. It wasn't overly difficult, I just had to file a request to the Special Collections Dept, and then wait a few days for them to retrieve the book or material, and then I had to view it with them in the same room to make sure I didn't damage it or try to steal it.
I never once ran into the problem of being told no anytime I wanted to access something... just had to jump through hoops to get it.
Scientific Journals on the other hand... suck. Most of them are seriously pay-walled, and so you need to either cough up a lot of money, or request your professor pull the paper for you. That's where my research into the interaction of Canine and Human gamettes came to a screeching halt. While there were some papers that were public that I could get access to to get protein information I needed... so much was in papers I couldn't. There's even papers from the 50s and 60s that are still paywalled. A researcher named Bartlett did a bunch of studies on the subject, "Biochemical Characteristics of Dog Semen", "Studies on dog semen. I. Morphological characteristics", and "Studies on dog semen. II. Biochemical characteristics". But they're all paywalled. I was able to take advantage of a free trial to get access to one of them last year, but I havent read the others. And for obvious reasons I wasn't going to walk up to my professor and ask him to download them for me. lol
D
Deleted member
Guest
OMG you guys, sorry to hear of that level of censorship!
When I went to school, we didn't have that. Surprisingly the more things have got "Liberal", the left are doing the censoring like crazy according to my kids.
When I went to school, we didn't have that. Surprisingly the more things have got "Liberal", the left are doing the censoring like crazy according to my kids.
allyfitz
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
It's not exactly censorship, as the word is normally used. With respect to research materials that are non-digital... It's usually dont to protect the item, either because its old... or because the number of the books that were printed were so low that the institution doesn't want to risk it being damaged or misplaced because its not easy to replace.
With respect to digital papers, that's the racket of Science Journals. Read up on the Aaron Swartz case to get a better understanding. Here's what he wrote about it. https://archive.org/details/GuerillaOpenAccessManifesto Science Journals effectively have a legal extortion scheme/monolopy. In order to advance your research career you need to write papers and publish them in science journal, In order to write papers you need access to prior papers. So you have to publish on their platforms to get anywhere, and you have to pay them to access the material already on them. The more respected the name, the more it costs, and the more important it becomes to have your work published there.
TheSeeker
Citizen of Zooville
I went to a hippie private school and in 5th grade my perverted teacher taught us about that story. He was not shy to tell us about zoophilia… probably why he got fired
Worshipper Wolf
Tourist
Also Fenrir is Loki's son.
Patroclusmerm
Tourist
Moral of the story loki was freak who gave no fucks
I will mention one that i didn't see anyone mentioning.
Caligula really loved his horse Incitatus. Horse roamed free in house, bathed in their baths, had servants, almost appointed consul, exc. I wonder what was happening there ...
Most that is known about him came from one historian who didn't like him that much and who wrote about him after his demise, so everything needs to be taken lightly.
Caligula really loved his horse Incitatus. Horse roamed free in house, bathed in their baths, had servants, almost appointed consul, exc. I wonder what was happening there ...
Most that is known about him came from one historian who didn't like him that much and who wrote about him after his demise, so everything needs to be taken lightly.
Wasbitchpolly
Prized Citizen of ZV
Greek
Wasbitchpolly
Prized Citizen of ZV
The original Gumby and Pokey ?
Yeah, the Greek, they were naughty indeed.
Wasbitchpolly
Prized Citizen of ZV
They still are......so I’m told ?
Greek and Rome were the paradise for animal lovers as I was told. Those orgies were taking days and every exotic/farm animal was involved you can name.
Orgies with exotic animals? Name the place and I'm on the plane within an hour
Funny
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
a very interesting motif, imagine it as a base on a porcelain banquet dinner set ;-)
Some would appreciate it
Mn42as
Citizen of Zooville
So iff i understand it right, there is a lot off ancient zoophilia material behind closed doors never to be seen for the public?
Someone should make a documentary about ancient zoophilia but it would probably be to controversial to do so nowadays.