• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:

  • Total voters
    1,790
Thanks for deleting the video I reported a few days ago! I didn't get a notification that it was resolved but I don't see it anymore so I'm assuming it's gone. It was an absolutely disgusting video with every kind of hurtful behavior one could exhibit and it's abhorrent that so many gave it a thumbs up
 
GAThrawn said:
Thanks for deleting the video I reported a few days ago! I didn't get a notification that it was resolved but I don't see it anymore so I'm assuming it's gone. It was an absolutely disgusting video with every kind of hurtful behavior one could exhibit and it's abhorrent that so many gave it a thumbs up
Click to expand...
The report is still active.
We are debating whether the dog is even alive. The original author of the video has a history of animal abuse from before.
 
pes said:
The report is still active.
We are debating whether the dog is even alive. The original author of the video has a history of animal abuse from before.
Click to expand...
I did not need to see that, from now on anyone else that posts content from BigAwoo is getting banned.
 
We do not know that from the video.
But this user had previous content removed for animal abuse.
I am pretty sure you can google his username to confirm. Having content on one of the most abusive video porn sites also does not help much.
 
Last edited:
pes said:
We do not know that from the video.
But this user had previous content removed for animal abuse.
I am pretty sure you can google his username to confirm. Having content on one of the most abusive video porn sites also does no help much.
Click to expand...
That's sad... Really. Why can't the government catch those who actively harm animal life instead of worrying and baiting the "easy" ethical or desperate people?
 
Navin said:
I recorded this a few years ago before knowing this place. I started when I was a kid and only stopped cause pets in my house never were mine and I couldn't keep em.

Now I wish I'd recorded myself more cause I let my dogs lick me for years and now all just lives in my memories.

If I get a pet in the future I will for sure starting to record myself more and put it all out there.
Click to expand...
Using bait for licking.
Deleted, warned.
 
pes said:
Using bait for licking.
Deleted, warned.
Click to expand...
alright, sorry? I didn't think of the nature of using mayonnaise, but I get why it can be abusive since the dog is not doing it by himself. won't happen again.

pes said:
Using bait for licking.
Deleted, warned.
Click to expand...
btw I have a question and is if I can use my own saliva? Sorry about the dumb question but I read the rules in M/M and it doesn't say anything about using baits and I dunno if I can use my own saliva.
 
Having taken a look at the voting, I am shocked and worried that 700 users voted no. That means they likely fapped to abusive content without reporting it...so they could go back the next day and fap to it again
 
GAThrawn said:
Having taken a look at the voting, I am shocked and worried that 700 users voted no. That means they likely fapped to abusive content without reporting it...so they could go back the next day and fap to it again
Click to expand...
Or they voted before seeing any abusive porn and did not return to fix the vote.
I consider the poll to not be very accurate.
 
Maybe the poll question should read "have you seen porn you realized was abusive"?

For one, most fappers will not have found this thread cause... it is out of the porn section.

And more seriously, when you are seeing something out of your knowledge base, (like watching "odd" porn with animals you are not familiar with) it is easy to overlook something obvious to knowledged people.

In any case the poll is not that important for the thread function at thus point
 
Sharing this because I want to get a second opinion on this:
User HereForElephantSchlongs says he found an elephant video, but because the elephant is chained, they can't share it. Instead, they describes the video, gives as detailed a name as possible to find the channel, and a couple of other users are asking for it in DMs.

My opinion is that sharing a description of a vid on YT and giving the channel name in a very roundabout way still counts as against the rules, as one is still using the forum to share media that is abusive. Breaking the rules but with extra steps, as it were. But again, not a mod so just wanting another set of eyes on this. Feels silly throwing this in the ring when there's so much underage porn but hey, abusive is abusive.

EDIT: Nice to see my instinct was right on that and it got pulled.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top