• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:


  • Total voters
    1,694
@Carolina666
Commercial crap fake thick dog cum trash. Dog forced to stay in position by holding all 4 paws. Uninterested nonzoo idiot wrongly sucking him and spitting out thick cum.

Learn how dog work:

Deleted.
 
@dogman60
Nothing about that rope around the head and the head twisted back feels wrong to you?

An above average, excellent video as it gives shots of the rest of the cow. I don't know much about cows and am wondering if the vocalizations she's making are orgasms? I was disappointed though that there isn't a finish...
@EponasDevotee neither to you? I would have expected better from you honestly.
 
@dogman60
Nothing about that rope around the head and the head twisted back feels wrong to you?


@EponasDevotee neither to you? I would have expected better from you honestly.
*sighs* As I stated I don't know about cows or even how they're handled. The head device looks similar to some rope halters that are used on equines. The background is dark so some detail is difficult to make out (my vision isn't 20/20 either). As abuse has been identified then it's definitely a no-go. I can only apologize for my lack the knowledge and non existent experience with cows...
 
Last edited:
We finally got a family dog for the kids. She’s very curious and I’ve always been really intrigued by zoo.

Last week whilst the family was outside, Bella followed me to my office and I got my cock out.

She wasn’t stopping. The best feeling ever.

Mods - apologies if I do this wrong… first time posting haha

Using bait for licking.
Read the rules.
Deleted, warned.
 
I've been wondering since I found out that some cow porn, which showed the whole cow, that I posted a comment on was deemed abusive. How much of the close-up equine (and other) porn is abusive but can't be identified as such because of the limited perspective of the close-up material? If I were to make a guess likely a good part. I'm distressed that I didn't recognize the abuse in the cow video due to my lack of knowledge and experience with cows...
 
We work with what we have.
The cow video looked like he has to hold her tight on that rope so she does not move away.
The problem with "it is done in the industry so it is ok" approach is that the industry does not really care much. So it is not a good measure of animal wellbeing.
 
We work with what we have.
The cow video looked like he has to hold her tight on that rope so she does not move away.
The problem with "it is done in the industry so it is ok" approach is that the industry does not really care much. So it is not a good measure of animal wellbeing.
The "Industry" is only concerned with max numbers with least effort, it very nature even if not intended all ways ends in abuse by necessity of doing things en mass!

why I started raising my own meat as I am against that, so in general if you can even compare it to "standard" practice you all ready know you're off to a bad start
 
where is that list?
Search for underage. The items on the list have been confirmed by several mods to be underage and removed before.
 
ty (May help to link that to those threads you nuke but leave so others can get familiarized with it)
 
Pfft. Like any porn hound would check it.
No but people like me who are highly visually acute will, then should I stumble across any of it report it! I nearly never go into that area, but should they post it in general section with vague title I'll usually peek just to figure out wtf they're bleating about. which is exactly how I ended up right here right now.
 
Problem is I am *not* going through a list of images of that *even* to identify and report.

Not a big problem as I am not usually uploading commercial videos, but you get my feeling there... If I was uploading, I would likely not have the will to check either.

Thanks guys. Shows many times moding *can* be really hard
 
Problem is I am *not* going through a list of images of that *even* to identify and report.

Not a big problem as I am not usually uploading commercial videos, but you get my feeling there... If I was uploading, I would likely not have the will to check either.

Thanks guys. Shows many times moding *can* be really hard
I count on that fact for banning pedos.
 
I don't remember seeing another video where the dog is exposed on its back.

Your young slim girl is forcefully raping a dog holding him by his legs and flipping him on his back.
Forcing his sheath over the knot.
Sucking him the wrong way.
Jerking him like a human and constanly holding his snout in a fist.

How you could not recognize this is animal abuse is beyond me.
4 warning points.
Deleted.
 

These images contain these prompts and look very young:
painful, young:1.0...
Are we in a phase where we are creating images of women in pain who are also barely legal or underage?
Images deleted, 3 warning points.
Is this why the author was banned? It said underage AI art on her profile, but it seems like a difficult thing to determine. FYI I never saw the pics, so I’m not commenting on whether or not they should have been deleted, I trust the mods judgment. But she is in her early 20s (I think 22/23?), recently started k9, and had posted about how it was painful at first. It seems like the prompt (based on the short description above at least) could well have been an artistic expression of her own first time or experiences, which wouldn’t have been underaged. The mods make the final call, but a ban does seem harsh.

With AI art it might be helpful to have some guidelines on acceptable prompt content. If the prompt had said “teen” instead of “young” this would be a very different situation, but young is a relative term that doesn’t pick out a specific age range. Perhaps it shouldn’t be used, but with new technologies we also need to establish new norms.

On a tangent, I was looking for the rules section on warning points and couldn’t find it. How many points before being banned?
 
We do not ban people only based on the prompt, the prompts are usually not even available, but also on how the images look.
We have a guideline, if it looks underage it is underage. So if you generate an image that has features which make it look like an underage person, it will be treated that way.

It is not difficult to generate images of people who do NOT look to be barely legal.
So there is a very easy way to avoid bans like this, yet for some reason people are not taking that route.

 
Back
Top