• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:


  • Total voters
    1,743
View attachment 558172

We have fun on Snapchat
?

Using bait.
Deleted.
 
Hi pes, just wanted to say you're awesome. Keep up the great work cleaning this place up :love:

Btw for ages I thought I was going crazy thinking your pfp was blinking cuz I was just catching it at the corner of my eye but realised it actually is after staring it down for a while :LOL:
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: pes
Hi pes, just wanted to say you're awesome. Keep up the great work cleaning this place up :love:

Btw for ages I thought I was going crazy thinking your pfp was blinking cuz I was just catching it at the corner of my eye but realised it actually is after staring it down for a while :LOL:
I just noticed the blink a few days ago myself! I was like, wtf was that, some scrolling artifact. Then I had to have a stare down contest to test!
 
I just noticed the blink a few days ago myself! I was like, wtf was that, some scrolling artifact. Then I had to have a stare down contest to test!
I know right! but whenever pes bear winks at me now I just give him a wink back ?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: pes
Wow, fucking a fish? I didn't even know that was possible! But then again, I knew nothing about zoo stuff before joining this site!
 
Poor fishy, I hope whoever he is gets one of those pee hole fishes stuck up his dick.
I've actually read stories of people in South America who pee in lakes and fish travel up the pee stream and attack from the inside. That freaked me the hell out
 
what can you do about someone in a group i'm in sharing a meme that is really telling to how they see animals? i don't know if it's against the rules as it's not actually abusive content, however it's very very off-putting to me. just take a look.

i know some part of it IS against the rules if we count young animals in discussions of pedophilia/CSA considering it features two young animals.
1715993984719.png1715993967150.png
"beasts were put on this earth for human pleasure" "they're just stupid animals" "will fuck any beast as small as a mouse" "no animal around him is safe" and they're putting that in a positive light.

i feel like it's probable this person has liked/posted abusive content on here aswell.

the group is zoophile memes.
 
what can you do about someone in a group i'm in sharing a meme that is really telling to how they see animals? i don't know if it's against the rules as it's not actually abusive content, however it's very very off-putting to me. just take a look.

i know some part of it IS against the rules if we count young animals in discussions of pedophilia/CSA considering it features two young animals.
View attachment 564216View attachment 564215
"beasts were put on this earth for human pleasure" "they're just stupid animals" "will fuck any beast as small as a mouse" "no animal around him is safe" and they're putting that in a positive light.

i feel like it's probable this person has liked/posted abusive content on here aswell.

the group is zoophile memes.
I'll take a look in a moment.
 
what can you do about someone in a group i'm in sharing a meme that is really telling to how they see animals? i don't know if it's against the rules as it's not actually abusive content, however it's very very off-putting to me. just take a look.

i know some part of it IS against the rules if we count young animals in discussions of pedophilia/CSA considering it features two young animals.
View attachment 564216View attachment 564215
"beasts were put on this earth for human pleasure" "they're just stupid animals" "will fuck any beast as small as a mouse" "no animal around him is safe" and they're putting that in a positive light.

i feel like it's probable this person has liked/posted abusive content on here aswell.

the group is zoophile memes.
Was this on this site or elsewhere? I may have mis read the beginning there.
 
How is it that the quality of the "meme" directly correlates with the apparent age of the creator and poster? It looks like it was drawn by a 6 year old, demonstrates the mentality of a 6 year old and has the misinformation only a 6 year old can make up.

Anywho, If it's on the forum. The poster needs to be thrown out.
 
Was this on this site or elsewhere? I may have mis read the beginning there.
How is it that the quality of the "meme" directly correlates with the apparent age of the creator and poster? It looks like it was drawn by a 6 year old, demonstrates the mentality of a 6 year old and has the misinformation only a 6 year old can make up.

Anywho, If it's on the forum. The poster needs to be thrown out.
it's on the forum! the group is "zoophile memes"
 
Back
Top