The abusive porn cleanup project
- Thread starter pes
- Start date
-
- Tags
- abuse animal porn clean report
sarahsingletono98
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
sorry for your loss
Silvervine
Citizen of Zooville
No worries, it'll probably be a few weeks before I can help since I have a medical procedure coming up but once I'm recovered I'll pop in and get started.@Silvervine if you would like to help. The sections above are in maintenance mode.
Meaning I have gone through every single piece of porn in them in all the threads.
What is needed now is to keep an eye on the new and active threads.
Which you have to do at least every two days unless you want to spend an hour on it. They grow quickly.
Useful links:
Crap porn identification
Some bad/abusive porn shows up frequently. (Surprisingly it is often commercial zoo porn, who would have guessed.) So this place will accumulate identification screenshots along with links to the reports for fast reference...www.zoovilleforum.net
What is worth reporting (with examples and images)
Over the past few weeks I have been told that people are not sure what to report or what to look out for in videos. So here over time I will put examples and occasionally images of the stuff I regularly report and get successful removals from. Reporting content does not automatically remove it...
If anyone can spare 250k. That would buy me for a year and I can dedicate that time to the forum 
. But in all seriousness I would love to help out more, unfortunately bills need to be paid, horses, doggos and kiddos need their needs taken care of, the usual stuff. This property is not quite self sufficient..... Yet.
. But in all seriousness I would love to help out more, unfortunately bills need to be paid, horses, doggos and kiddos need their needs taken care of, the usual stuff. This property is not quite self sufficient..... Yet.
Theunis323
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
I too put more money in for my horse and three dogs that I struggle myself to live but they are more important to me than myself. 250k is a lot ?If anyone can spare 250k. That would buy me for a year and I can dedicate that time to the forum
sarahsingletono98
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
if you give me 255K i will spot you the 250 lol. horses, doggos and kiddos -- plural! no thanks i only have one of one of those and that is enough. Need a farm hand? and by that I mean someone to browse here all day while you work. Updating the homestead thread later, but going to look at a property today (getting a feel for what is out there, not ready to drain my bank account just yet).If anyone can spare 250k. That would buy me for a year and I can dedicate that time to the forum
Using bait for licking.
1 point. Deleted.
It's a bit like how you can get people in BDSM. It may not be as bad as people fear.
Though just like with people in BDSM some situations can be mishandled as well. How can you tell?
Best way to find out is to talk to people. Ask questions. Get details. There's no "easy" way with things like this.
What people fear may be a "little bit of nervousness". That's perfectly normal. It's only when it goes to "Scared shitless" that it's going to become more concerning (I linked a thread about a scared dog for example. That kind of fear. Poor thing).
It all takes a trained eye. Since I haven't seen any of the vids I'm not going to speculate. What I am saying however is to look for certain signs. Do people raise their voices? That's going to be more harmful. But if someone "calmly employs force" without the shouting it can go better.
It's a bit like how a cop might do it. Exept a number of cops are stupid enough to raise their voice. The good ones will remain calm and won't shout. Picture a drill sergent that camly warns their recruits. No raised voice. Yet firm and stern nonetheless. It can be hard for people to tell how this happens with "physical" force. Try to look for these kind of details in whatever vids you might see.
You might want to watch some cop vids too. See how they handle (and mishandle) situations. That could help. Is force being employed with a "nudge" or a "shove". etc.
Though just like with people in BDSM some situations can be mishandled as well. How can you tell?
Best way to find out is to talk to people. Ask questions. Get details. There's no "easy" way with things like this.
What people fear may be a "little bit of nervousness". That's perfectly normal. It's only when it goes to "Scared shitless" that it's going to become more concerning (I linked a thread about a scared dog for example. That kind of fear. Poor thing).
It all takes a trained eye. Since I haven't seen any of the vids I'm not going to speculate. What I am saying however is to look for certain signs. Do people raise their voices? That's going to be more harmful. But if someone "calmly employs force" without the shouting it can go better.
It's a bit like how a cop might do it. Exept a number of cops are stupid enough to raise their voice. The good ones will remain calm and won't shout. Picture a drill sergent that camly warns their recruits. No raised voice. Yet firm and stern nonetheless. It can be hard for people to tell how this happens with "physical" force. Try to look for these kind of details in whatever vids you might see.
You might want to watch some cop vids too. See how they handle (and mishandle) situations. That could help. Is force being employed with a "nudge" or a "shove". etc.
Let's cover a specific situation. Hypothetically. You mentioned muzzles in your first post. So let's use a muzzle situation.
Let's say a dog is muzzled. But they could be the angry type. This means no muzzle could result in harm for person or/and dog.
Do you consider that to be abusive?
If you can not have sex with an animal safely, then do not have sex with that animal. It is very simple.
The same principle is applied to porn with for example horses with bound legs. It is done for the protection of the female actress. Great, but you can have sex with a horse without ropes, it has been demonstrated.
Making porn does not justify immobilizing an animal.
The same principle is applied to porn with for example horses with bound legs. It is done for the protection of the female actress. Great, but you can have sex with a horse without ropes, it has been demonstrated.
Making porn does not justify immobilizing an animal.
Last edited:
If it was that simple I would not have asked you the question. I want to see an open mind from you.
You didn't give me a "yes" or a "no" or "it depends". You skipped ahead to trying to explain and justify yourself (a common oversight). I'm calling this a snap judgement. I'm saying I don't see an open mind when you go "It's that simple". You might not like what I say. But I'm saying it straight.
It depends.
It always depends. You are not considering this properly. You see what you fear and you make snap judgements. You are not being realistic about this. You are not considering other owners that want to do things with their dogs, which they WILL do. Despite your protests. Nothing you or I say here will change this. If it is going to happen then how can the risk be minimized?
Still think it's simple? Think this through Pes.
Now me, personally I'd let myself be a target and would never put a muzzle on a dog. But that's me. Others aren't going to be willing to risk being bitten. It's better to "allow anger". That's when people and animals alike will defuse. When you don't "flail back" or something. This is me however. That's me. What I have to consider here is others who will do the things you fear. Wherever you like it or not. I can't stop it. You can't stop it. But what you CAN do is is go "if it's going to happen then let's be careful about it." Address context more. You. Gave. Me. None.
I'm being honest Pes. If you want to stop the conversation we can. But I'm concerned about owners and dogs as well. And that means "consider the possability". The problem isn't "danger". It's "Not knowing the situation and mishandling it".
Yes, I am fully aware that banning someone from here does not erase that person from existence.
But animal abuse is not going to be tolerated on here. That is the extent of what we can do. And that is what we do.
Yes it is. When we decide something here is animal abuse, we delete it. And we warn or ban the user. That is the end of what we can do here.
We are pretty clear on what is animal abuse and how it is handled. The knowledge is there and available to anyone to read and learn.
That does not mean we will allow animal abuse to exist on the forum as an example of what not to do.
You can do better. You are being close minded.
Would it help put your mind at ease if I walk into a police station and get them to agree with me?
I wouldn't mention the site. Or you. I'd just talk to them about how to handle situations better. Something you seem to stubonly refuse to consider.
It would be my risk to take. I am fine with that. When it comes right down to it people just want to know danger isn't being ignored. And if you're just trying to "push it all away" then that is ignoring the danger.
Would it help put your mind at ease if I walk into a police station and get them to agree with me?
I wouldn't mention the site. Or you. I'd just talk to them about how to handle situations better. Something you seem to stubonly refuse to consider.
It would be my risk to take. I am fine with that. When it comes right down to it people just want to know danger isn't being ignored. And if you're just trying to "push it all away" then that is ignoring the danger.
That is irrelevant on the forum. We have our rules which we enforce the way we do.
What exactly do you want to change in the system we currently use? And please be concise and clear.
The outcome obviously has to be that animal abuse will not be allowed to exist on the forum.
That includes restraining or immobilizing an animal or having sex with an animal that does not want to have sex with you so you have to protect yourself from the animal. That is in other words called rape.
It is not irrelevent.
An open mind considers the possability. A closed mind does not. The more you pretend things are simple the more you will harm people. And animals too. This is me warning you of the danger. I am the danger. If I say danger it MEANS danger.
The abuse will exist. When you don't want to see it. That's when the BIGGEST danger happens Pes. The danger is turning a blind eye to it.
What if what you see as "abuse" isn't as abusive as you fear? But you don't consider that do you?
An open mind considers the possability. A closed mind does not. The more you pretend things are simple the more you will harm people. And animals too. This is me warning you of the danger. I am the danger. If I say danger it MEANS danger.
Let's say you delete every vid. ALL of them. Do you think that will stop people? The answer is no of course.
The abuse will exist. When you don't want to see it. That's when the BIGGEST danger happens Pes. The danger is turning a blind eye to it.
What if what you see as "abuse" isn't as abusive as you fear? But you don't consider that do you?
Yes we do. Unclear reports are discussed between several mods.
What is considered abuse is described in the rules. If you post that, it is your misfortune.
We do not aim to fix the entire world. As said before our reach ends with where the forum ends.
But we will not have animal abuse here just as an example of what not to do.
This is treading into dangerous waters. Abuse is abuse and will be treated as such. It sounds to me like you are trying to rationalize abuse. If a dog does not want to participate and he or she is forced to, that is abuse and will be treated as abuse and the person posting will be educated unless it's painfully obvious then it's simply just a ban.
There is no "well the situation” bullshit. Animals are pretty damn clear when they don't want to participate.
Muzzle? No. That just means it shouldn't be happening in the first place. The dog is dangerous.
There is no "well the situation” bullshit. Animals are pretty damn clear when they don't want to participate.
Muzzle? No. That just means it shouldn't be happening in the first place. The dog is dangerous.
I suggest you stop while you're ahead, advocating animal abuse and sex with immature animals will see you banned in short order, neither is tolerated here nor is it up for debate.
Reconscope
Supreme Citizen of ZV
Why is there almost as many noes as the amount of yeses?
Does that mean we are floating dandy?
Does that mean we are floating dandy?
Cookiecaretaker
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
i am just here to boop ALL the snoots
Last edited:
Can't say that I didn't give them fair warning.
dartel
Prized Citizen of ZV
I think we have this figured out pretty well and no help is needed at the moment.
