• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:

  • Total voters
    1,871
Ok so I don't know about this one, in this section of the clip I don't think the horse is being hurt and it's not surprising he isn't erect if he's peeing. I just get the vibe that the woman was actually trying to get some other fluid out of him at the time. And clearly he's not thinking super sexy thoughts with what's happening, so not sure which side of the remove fence I'm standing on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
HugDoggy said:
Ok so I don't know about this one, in this section of the clip I don't think the horse is being hurt and it's not surprising he isn't erect if he's peeing. I just get the vibe that the woman was actually trying to get some other fluid out of him at the time. And clearly he's not thinking super sexy thoughts with what's happening, so not sure which side of the remove fence I'm standing on.
Click to expand...
All of that aside, it clearly doesn't belong solo animals, so should be removed on that grounds alone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
I would just like to ask, aren't fence/owner-hopping videos pre-rule change supposed to be given some leniency? Every time I get a "report resolved" notification for one from 2019/2020 the user is warned or banned. I thought verbal warnings were going to be given for first offenses on old posts (of course all these users may have records I don't know of)
 
gsdmixg said:
I would just like to ask, aren't fence/owner-hopping videos pre-rule change supposed to be given some leniency? Every time I get a "report resolved" notification for one from 2019/2020 the user is warned or banned. I thought verbal warnings were going to be given for first offenses on old posts (of course all these users may have records I don't know of)
Click to expand...
A couple I think I gave a notice, but one that was really sus where someone was on the side of the road getting a lick job and left. I believe he was given a warning. But could be wrong.
 
This will be a long one so bear with me, I usually just report and move on, but in this case, and the multiple instances of abuse shown, it warrants being posted in here. I can also copy/paste my info in here for my eventual report of the clip. Maybe we can get some identifiers for the clips I'm going to specify in this report for future action? For the compilation I mean, anyone else in here should be able to tell an under age animal. We don't need to show them here. One clip I'm going to report does not show the abuse, but a pic from the clip was used as an identifier in a story I read in this thread during a conversation between @FloofyNewfie and @pes I believe. The person who is in the clip is a verified abuser. So the identifiers do indeed help. See report below.

All information pertains to this clip...Post in thread 'ZMV 3 part video series' https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/zmv-3-part-video-series.65417/post-1948790

Timestamps and examples are as follows.
7:32 to 7:39- Man having vaginal sex with a calf.
7:53 to 8:01- Man having oral sex with a calf.
8:12 to 8:24- Yet another clip of a man having vaginal sex with a calf.
10:53 to 10:56- This is the clip I mentioned earlier of a man having sex with a female dog that doesn't show abuse, but was previously used to identify the man in the clip as an abuser earlier in this thread.
12:48 to 12:50- I'll be honest, I'm not 100% sure what's going on here, but I think I know. You'll see.
14:17 to 14:19- Quick shot of a man having sex with a female dog, it's quick but I believe she whines. The human didn't stop.

All of these instances are from part 3 of a compilation video set. The other two videos are posted in the same thread. I have not reviewed them yet, but I will review them later for another report. Unless someone else beats me to it. I would appreciate it.
 
All of these instances are from part 3 of a compilation video set. The other two videos are posted in the same thread. I have not reviewed them yet, but I will review them later for another report. Unless someone else beats me to it. I would appreciate it.
Click to expand...

Nevermind, the thread is gone. Thanks @pes.
 
@Zorge @Oldman (I got a PM from the OP on this)
This thread got deleted with: "Your thread Small dogs was deleted. Reason: Forced shit. Don't post shit like this again."
So in case anyone is clueless on why, here is the explanation:
1. The dog looks emaciated. Skin and bone but that might still be just appearance.
2. 1:05 both legs held in front of the camera, because you can not have a dog move out of the frame when people are paying you on chaturbate, can you. The dog is visibly trying to move.
The woman is sucking him in the known and incorrect way. This continues until the dog finally manages to get away where the video cuts. There is quite a bit of struggling there and leg holding.
3:31 the dog is moved into frame and is visibly stressed and not fine with it. Tense body language through the whole thing. Any chance the dog has, he is moving away.
8:10 the whole sex scene is a guy holding the dog on the woman and simulating humping by moving the whole dog. Several times his hand can be seen.
11:01 the woman is holding his paw to force him to stay on her, the moment he can, he jumps off.
12:00 more holding and simulated humping.

This is what it looks like when you rape a dog that has never seen you in a hotel room.
Looks like a stray dog, not taken good care of either.
Never through the whole video have I seen a single hint of excitement, the dog is apathetic, shut down and does not want to be there.
Let alone the lame, dumb "actress".
 
Just wanted to say that I'm actually really glad to see that this is well enforced here. That there's a standard upheld. Being new here I didn't know what to expect coming in as this is the very first community I've ever joined but I've liked what I've seen thus far and this just makes me feel all the better. Thanks for the work y'all do here.
 
Fart26rus said:
video
Click to expand...

Yes, alisonproductions has after decades of fake cum commercial crap porn learned that when your actress has never seen a live horse, you need to let the horse mount a mare to make him cum. Because your actress can not do anything else than hold the penis and open the mouth. No skill, no knowledge of how to jerk a horse off. Actually in many examples no ability to close the mouth and not let the cum out.
But they have not learned to not bind the legs. They have to make sure the lame actress who does not know nothing about animals is not hurt, they can not afford to have a zoophile with actual relationship with the animal. Which is why their porn is considered animal abuse. As well as against the rules because it is recent commercial content.
 
pes said:

Yes, alisonproductions has after decades of fake cum commercial crap porn learned that when your actress has never seen a live horse, you need to let the horse mount a mare to make him cum. Because your actress can not do anything else than hold the penis and open the mouth. No skill, no knowledge of how to jerk a horse off. Actually in many examples no ability to close the mouth and not let the cum out.
But they have not learned to not bind the legs. They have to make sure the lame actress who does not know nothing about animals is not hurt, they can not afford to have a zoophile with actual relationship with the animal. Which is why their porn is considered animal abuse. As well as against the rules because it is recent commercial content.
Click to expand...
but some of the cum got on her face! that's all that matters!
 
Just want to let whoever I was communicating with before know so I don't continue to disappear off the face of the earth. I still intend to finish M/M dogs, just extremely busy unexpectedly atm between work and college. I'll get back to it at some point soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
@msdogy Commercial crap.
All 4 legs bound.
Head bound.
Mare in front.
No excitement, no humps, no proper erection, no flare, no cumshot.
Fake cum 14:14 from an unflared, limp cock.
Semi limp dick shoved into body orifices of lame unskilled actresses.
Warning point for animal abuse, deleted.
55.png45.png

Identifier:
387.png

Crap porn identification

Some bad/abusive porn shows up frequently. (Surprisingly it is often commercial zoo porn, who would have guessed.) So this place will accumulate identification screenshots along with links to the reports for fast reference...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net
 
So as I've been continuing my journey through the Solo horse section, I've found the occasional picture where a horse doesn't seem to have a tail. So I was wondering are there any breeds of horse without tails? Or are they docked for any good reason? I would have thought a horse tail is a pretty good fly swat, so even if it gets a bit of poop on it that might attract insects, a good swish or whack of the tail would send them on their way again if only temporarily.

Here is an example of what I'm talking about.

So is tail docking in horses classed as abusive then?
If so should it be posted? Clearly the horse is no less deserving of love and adoration, but I wasn't really sure how to feel about it in pictures here.
 
HugDoggy said:
So as I've been continuing my journey through the Solo horse section, I've found the occasional picture where a horse doesn't seem to have a tail. So I was wondering are there any breeds of horse without tails? Or are they docked for any good reason? I would have thought a horse tail is a pretty good fly swat, so even if it gets a bit of poop on it that might attract insects, a good swish or whack of the tail would send them on their way again if only temporarily.

Here is an example of what I'm talking about.

So is tail docking in horses classed as abusive then?
If so should it be posted? Clearly the horse is no less deserving of love and adoration, but I wasn't really sure how to feel about it in pictures here.
Click to expand...

Tail docking has been done to avoid tails getting caught in carriage harnesses. As far as I know, several countries (UK, Belgium and Netherlands are mentioned here) have nationwide bans on docking. Other countries might have bans on docking for aesthetic reasons only.
 
HugDoggy said:
So as I've been continuing my journey through the Solo horse section, I've found the occasional picture where a horse doesn't seem to have a tail. So I was wondering are there any breeds of horse without tails? Or are they docked for any good reason? I would have thought a horse tail is a pretty good fly swat, so even if it gets a bit of poop on it that might attract insects, a good swish or whack of the tail would send them on their way again if only temporarily.

Here is an example of what I'm talking about.

So is tail docking in horses classed as abusive then?
If so should it be posted? Clearly the horse is no less deserving of love and adoration, but I wasn't really sure how to feel about it in pictures here.
Click to expand...
People amputate horse tails!? That's revolting!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top