• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:

  • Total voters
    1,674
@werkec
werkec said:
Found this among other videos, will share the rest at a later date
View attachment 225213
Click to expand...
5:36 what the hell is that? One thing here is very clear. That horse is not interested, those horrible actors are not owners of that horse and they are not at all and have never been zoophiles.
7:13 slapping the dick across her/his face. Would a zoophile do something like that? No. Zoophiles actually respect animals.
There is no cumshot, there is no flare, the elmer's glue you see after the "mysterious" cut at 8:36 is fake cum.
9:26 shoving a limp penis in his ass. An actually interested horse would shove that in on his own and probably completely through his colon. :D
There is no way the horse can withstand this amount of CBT without being drugged to stay calm. That is common in commercial crap porn.
You get a lube ejaculation at 17:06.
Disgusting commercial crap porn.

Please take a look at these reference videos which show what sex with a horse actually looks like:

The abusive porn cleanup project

Me and my big mouth. :gsd_laughing: I am quite time poor, so doing this on my own would be a little unlikely any time soon, but if someone wanted to help by finding the source clips to use preferably with the time code (just in minutes and seconds) of when the main abuse was occurring, I could...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net
Notice the behavior of the horse, the shape and flare of the penis and the stiffness of it and the consistency of the semen and the way it is ejaculated. Then you can compare that to the horrible example of animal and customer abuse you just posted.
 
So there is this "seacreatures,eels,fish,octopus or others" room on the zooville chat.
Screenshot1.pngScreenshot2.png
The link you see there is a video that shows a live eel insertion into the vagina of a woman. Which hints at what kind of content are the users in the group interested in. In other words that is animal abuse.
@Oldman @FloofyNewfie can you please have a look at that? Thanks.
 
pes said:
So there is this "seacreatures,eels,fish,octopus or others" room on the zooville chat.
View attachment 225516View attachment 225517
The link you see there is a video that shows a live eel insertion into the vagina of a woman. Which hints at what kind of content are the users in the group interested in. In other words that is animal abuse.
@Oldman @FloofyNewfie can you please have a look at that? Thanks.
Click to expand...
The admin of the chat has been notified of this rooms existence, and it should be taken care of soon enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
pes said:
So there is this "seacreatures,eels,fish,octopus or others" room on the zooville chat.
View attachment 225516View attachment 225517
The link you see there is a video that shows a live eel insertion into the vagina of a woman. Which hints at what kind of content are the users in the group interested in. In other words that is animal abuse.
@Oldman @FloofyNewfie can you please have a look at that? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Those topics have always been on the fence for me - only because -- take eels, they are largely consumed as food. And one i saw once of fishing worms - well we know what usually happens to them.

Also the eel ones come from a popular tv show. Similair to fear factor - but the usa is far more restrictive than most of the world (land of the free ???) and dont allow programs with sexual acts. Usa doesnt allow sexually suggestice commercials either ? free speech ?

I go back to brazil and see the different commercial and tv shows i literally laugh my ass off because the usa - whipe it is a safer place with far more opportunities for people, is a giant nanny country.

Got off topic - so yeah. You know im quick tp scream about abuse - bit these type for some reason im more undecided on.
 
Can one of the doglovers here have a look at this clip? The dog is lying on his back with the woman more or less sitting on him. You don't see much of the dog's penis, but to me it seems to be another incident where the dog doesn't have an erection, and that people actually take advantage of the penile bone instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
AppleDash said:
Can one of the doglovers here have a look at this clip? The dog is lying on his back with the woman more or less sitting on him. You don't see much of the dog's penis, but to me it seems to be another incident where the dog doesn't have an erection, and that people actually take advantage of the penile bone instead.
Click to expand...
Removed. Definitely no erection at all. She's squishing more than just the dogs chest.
 
Sydbarrett1179 said:
View attachment 131260
Skye's first taste of puppy love
Click to expand...
40 likes.

3:38 using bait for licking.
11:05 extracting limp penis from the sheath.
12:03 ignoring the dog's attempts to get away.
12:53 sucking on a limp penis while the dog is on his side.
13:32 preventing the dog from getting up.
15:11 almost limp penis dildogging.
16:03 holding the dogs hind leg to make him lay on his back while taking advantage of his penis bone.
19:27 holding both the dog's hind legs down to prevent movement. Forcing to stay.
19:57 the dog attempts to leave since she is jerking his almost limp penis the wrong way and that is visibly painful.
Classic commercial animal abusive crap porn.
The second video in this thread is the same crap just longer.

This user specializes in commercial crap porn, mostly because it has women. The likelihood of the majority of his threads being similar crap is very high. So if anyone would like to help reviewing them, please feel free to do so.
 
Last edited:
@FloofyNewfie @Oldman Apparently this user is already banned:
"Your recent report has been resolved: Post in thread 'Skye blu tribute' - User is already banned, so deleted."
So maybe removing the rest of his porn threads could help clean the crap up a bit.
 
kierpik said:
Japanese movies are usually censored (thankfully not all of them), but some of them are really worth watching. Here are two of my fav's
Click to expand...

1st post 1st video is the usual commercial crap, the actress has no idea how to jerk a dog off and there is a lot of dildogging. Obviously the dog is held in place by the guy they are not even trying to hide.

1st post 2nd video:
9:49 the dog is held by the guy above by a choker collar (visible later) while she tries to extract the penis from his sheath obviously knowing absolutely nothing about it.
And attempt at "jerking" the dog happens later and then two guys lift and hold the whole dog up to the bed, hold him by his tail while the actress poorly pretends to like sucking the dog. Really convincing. :D She is an obvious zoophile. :D
Then there is dildogging again.
The dog does not have a single moment in the entire video where he would be able to move freely.
Usual disgusting commercial crap porn made for nonzoophile fetishists.

2nd post:
2 dogs held in place by two guys (same as the 1st). 1:31 dildogging by moving the entire dog. Again the dogs have no choice at all. They are used as sex toys. 3:25 the same thing. The actress is completely disgusted and not a zoophile at all.
 
pes said:
1st post 1st video is the usual commercial crap, the actress has no idea how to jerk a dog off and there is a lot of dildogging. Obviously the dog is held in place by the guy they are not even trying to hide.

1st post 2nd video:
9:49 the dog is held by the guy above by a choker collar (visible later) while she tries to extract the penis from his sheath obviously knowing absolutely nothing about it.
And attempt at "jerking" the dog happens later and then two guys lift and hold the whole dog up to the bed, hold him by his tail while the actress poorly pretends to like sucking the dog. Really convincing. :D She is an obvious zoophile. :D
Then there is dildogging again.
The dog does not have a single moment in the entire video where he would be able to move freely.
Usual disgusting commercial crap porn made for nonzoophile fetishists.

2nd post:
2 dogs held in place by two guys (same as the 1st). 1:31 dildogging by moving the entire dog. Again the dogs have no choice at all. They are used as sex toys. 3:25 the same thing. The actress is completely disgusted and not a zoophile at all.
Click to expand...

That's right. But have you ever seen Japanese dog porn done differently? Matter of taste.
 
kierpik said:
Matter of taste.
Click to expand...
Not is a matter of not abusing animals. If you like watching animals being used as sex toys, you are not a zoophile and as soon as you post that I will report that.

kierpik said:
But have you ever seen Japanese dog porn done differently?
Click to expand...
No. Commercial porn of any variety is nearly always made this way because it is not made by zoophiles and it is not made for zoophiles. It is made by people who do it for money, do not care for animals at all and it is made for fetishists who more often than not would not be able to tell the difference between a cat and a dog as long as there is a "beautiful" actress near it. And that actress does not even have to like what she is doing. Fetishists watch it for the women and do not care for the animals and often even the women either.
Commercial zoo porn is almost always equivalent to animal abuse/exploitation and customer exploitation as it often shows fake behavior and cum and sets unreasonable expectations.
 
pes said:
Can we get a second opinion on this?
It seems to me the guy is using her tail to move the dog instead of his hips to move his penis. A tail is not supposed to be used for support and at best you should be grabbing the dog around the hips the same way a male dog would.
Click to expand...
It's very mixed opinion here. The k9 in question doesnt seem in distress however... The tail is a sensitive spot. It could be a lack of knowing this useful information. Its not abuse its mostly poor handling but at the same time hes not trying to hurt her it seems.

Poor handling but not malicious. Its a grey area since i see no resistance/discomfort
 
Reconscope said:
Poor handling but not malicious. Its a grey area since i see no resistance/discomfort
Click to expand...
It is specifically mentioned in the rules.

Videos of one pulling on a tail may be removed. A tail is not to be used for support or to pull an animal. Suppose an animal is not willing to participate. Do not proceed!
 
dartel said:
It is specifically mentioned in the rules.

Videos of one pulling on a tail may be removed. A tail is not to be used for support or to pull an animal. Suppose an animal is not willing to participate. Do not proceed!
Click to expand...
That is true
 
pes said:
So this just happened:
View attachment 226197
The thread got deleted very quickly but it shows what kind of sick fucks are lurking on this forum. (Which does not have any sort of filter during registration)
Click to expand...
Yep, that was wiped along with the user without hesitation. Some people are sick bastards.

For anyone who doesn't know what "crushing" is, it's about as horrific as it sounds. There are sick sadistic people that get off to people crushing bugs/snails/moles/gerbils/and even baby animals such as kittens under large boots (such as cowboy boots.) Some people are absolutely fucked in the head.
 
Mnaznboi said:
guys who are having sex with female animals.. isn't that pretty much animal abuse though?
Click to expand...
No.

Female Dogs Enjoying Sex Out Of Heat?

I know this is going to sound like me boasting, but it's not my intention one bit. Okay, so male zoos who have female dogs, do your girls love sex out of heat? I've spoken with a lot of zoos over the years and it seems like bitches are usually not very horny or slutty unless in heat. I've also...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net

How a female dog expresses consent with body language

Flagging (normally they do this behavior in standing heat) is how a female dog expresses that she is willing and ready to mate with a male, lifting of the vulva and tucking the tail off to one side are clear signs of consent, it is part of the k9 body language, they are absolutely capable of...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net
Female animals are completely capable of giving consent and asking for sex. And if their size and genitals allow it, there is no harm when a human penetrates them.
 
Mnaznboi said:
guys who are having sex with female animals.. isn't that pretty much animal abuse though?
Click to expand...
My oh my, are you serious? A 180 lbs 7 inches long man fucking a mare vs. a 900 lbs stallion fucking her with his 2 foot long dick? Abuse? You must be kidding...
 
RexAndMe said:

Should ***********rocks be on the banned sites list?

Like ******, ***********rocks has become a breeding ground for abusive material. At least from what I've seen linked in the Link Dump section. That and the fact that the comment section below every video is filled with messages selling Child Porn, incest, rape, you name it. So like ******...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net
Click to expand...
Honestly based on previous experience with attempting to change the rules, I am skeptical, but worth a try.
 
Horst Trapper said:
My oh my, are you serious? A 180 lbs 7 inches long man fucking a mare vs. a 900 lbs stallion fucking her with his 2 foot long dick? Abuse? You must be kidding...
Click to expand...
The idea that all penetrative sex with female animals is abusive is not new. I have seen it mentioned a couple of times on the forum already. I guess it stems from the idea that a female must be submissive and does not have a choice. That has been disproved already.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top