• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:


  • Total voters
    1,674
I also just finished filing about 20 reports of mostly porn and personal adverts that claim to be "teens".

WARNING: No posting media with the word "teen." This indicates someone under the age of 18 and will be removed without notice. Likewise, if someone appears to be younger than 18, the content will be removed. Please report anything you think should be reviewed.
This also extends to content with kids in the background (it doesn't matter if they can be seen or not). Do not upload! This can border on producing CP even if no other party is involved and will be removed without warning.
 
Apparently some sort of a horse core thread was recently closed. Was that because of abusive content or a different reason, does anyone know?
There is a horsecore thread which went a bit "dumpster fire". Reason being 20 year old footage was finally posted and some people didn't like what they were seeing. The thread was closed without explanation.

Then a second thread (your mention) was created containing a lot of material present in the thread I mentioned just above. This thread was deleted 1 or 2 days after it's creation.

There is some 45 minutes of unreleased horse core and I hope Dogslikebacon will post them. He has to start a new thread since the old one is closed.
 
Whichever mod/admin worked on this report and sent me this:
"Unfortunately, your recent report has been rejected: Post in thread 'A medley from r/BeastFiction' - I had to read the whole damn story, there is no word teen"

Please observe:
Ctrl+f -> "teen" (search in page)
Took me 60 seconds to find and copy it here.

“It’s nothing,” the teen murmured, bending the fan slightly downwards so her dog could remain relaxed. “I just let some- hey!”
Glancing up with his dark eyes, he peered right into the teen’s, sitting oddly still.
The teen sat back down onto the chair, stretching her bare legs and turning the setting on the fan even higher.
The teen shook her head, then ran a hand through her hair.
The teen’s green eyes widened when she spotted his raging erection hanging low from between his legs, causing her to gasp.
The teen gasped- or at least tried to- but couldn't escape due to King pressing his body onto hers, keeping her in place.
The teen felt his stiff rod pulsate deep in her mouth, her eyes tearing up as she felt him poke the back of her throat.

I do not really understand how you managed to miss that. :D
@Oldman @FloofyNewfie can we please get this resolved?
I will edit this post and remove the words once you acknowledge that it exists.
 
Last edited:
Whichever mod/admin worked on this report and sent me this:
"Unfortunately, your recent report has been rejected: Post in thread 'A medley from r/BeastFiction' - I had to read the whole damn story, there is no word teen"

Please observe:
Ctrl+f -> "teen"









I do not really understand how you managed to miss that. :D
@Oldman @FloofyNewfie can we please get this resolved?
I will edit this post and remove the words once you acknowledge that it exists.
I skim the whole thing there's definitely a power disposition as well. But it never mentions exact age. But as you say teen indicates most likely underage. So the possibility is in there its up to the mods to look at it
 
I skim the whole thing there's definitely a power disposition as well. But it never mentions exact age. But as you say teen indicates most likely underage. So the possibility is in there its up to the mods to look at it
That should not matter anyway:
WARNING: No posting media with the word "teen." This indicates someone under the age of 18 and will be removed without notice. Likewise, if someone appears to be younger than 18, the content will be removed. Please report anything you think should be reviewed.
 
That should not matter anyway:
WARNING: No posting media with the word "teen." This indicates someone under the age of 18 and will be removed without notice. Likewise, if someone appears to be younger than 18, the content will be removed. Please report anything you think should be reviewed.
The problem is that he also mentions "D-cup breasts" and other indications of adulthood. What you are looking at is an author planting keywords in the story to draw search engine hits and "sell" their story.

It's a technical violation but not hard core pedo.
 
That should not matter anyway:
WARNING: No posting media with the word "teen." This indicates someone under the age of 18 and will be removed without notice. Likewise, if someone appears to be younger than 18, the content will be removed. Please report anything you think should be reviewed.
I just said that. Quit being a robot and actually read my detailed input instead going all rules bot on me. I told ya the rules are violated due to power discrepancy/implied parent figure saying your his bitch from now on. Plus her obliviousness to the situation. Adding also to the fact using the word teen.

I hate speech to text...
 
I just said that. Quit being a robot and actually read my detailed input instead going all rules bot on me. I told ya the rules are violated due to power discrepancy/implied parent figure saying your his bitch from now on. Plus her obliviousness to the situation. Adding also to the fact using the word teen.

I hate speech to text...
Sorry I misunderstood your intention.
 
the worst part about this, is that these types of videos perpetuate the stereotype that sex with animals is immoral. It’s going to be sooooo long before we are ever viewed as decent individuals.
 
Over my existence on Zooville I have personally reported content that showed:
1. Animals being forced into sex.
2. Animals being bound, muzzled, held or prevented from moving for the purpose of sex.
3. Animal genitalia being handled incorrectly which includes forceful sucking of a limp penis.
4. Animal rape.
5. Identifiable photos or videos of women being posted without their consent.
Most of which was then removed after a moderator review.
one major concern I have is issues where this might be happening off-camera but you can't actually see that there's stuff like binding/muzzling because the video is done super-closeup

this makes me think that maybe mods should ban 100% closeup videos since they fail to depict than an animal is unbound

only by seeing the entire animals body can you be sure that it isn't being confined by some unseen device off-panel
 
this makes me think that maybe mods should ban 100% closeup videos
This is unlikely. But I understand your concern. Very usually when the video is made for money or by someone who regularly invites unknown people to have sex with their animals, the animal is held in place by the owner. But the camera does not show the animal's head. Sometimes though you can see the hands on the side of the frame because avoiding it the whole time is difficult.
 
This is unlikely. But I understand your concern. Very usually when the video is made for money or by someone who regularly invites unknown people to have sex with their animals, the animal is held in place by the owner. But the camera does not show the animal's head. Sometimes though you can see the hands on the side of the frame because avoiding it the whole time is difficult.
yeah the idea of an owner holding it down bothers me...

like I'd love to see just an extended documentary where sex doesn't even happen all the time... like you have some instances where it's bored and walks off and doesn't want to fuck, and that's fine, try to romance it later, etc
 
yeah the idea of an owner holding it down bothers me...

like I'd love to see just an extended documentary where sex doesn't even happen all the time... like you have some instances where it's bored and walks off and doesn't want to fuck, and that's fine, try to romance it later, etc
Petlust usually shows the entire animals and at least the few videos I remember with dogs were not bad. There is usually nobody else with the animal except the actor and some of those seemed to be zoophiles.
They did have some questionable content too though like a few videos with snakes and I did not watch every single of their videos, but overall they seemed to be a bit better than your usual commercial zoo porn.
They even had some where sex just did not happen because the actor could not get the animal to mount him for example.
 
I'm dropping a fat load for you guys. Open your holes, here it comes.
2nd video this what it looks like when a nonzoo sucks a dog for money. She can be seen trying to force the sheath over his knot several times. The dog is prevented from getting up several times and she jerks his penis like a human dick which understandably makes the dog want to leave and he is not allowed.
two more:
The dog gets smacked over his head. How anyone thinks that is good porn is beyond me.
 
Last edited:
Could you have a look at the second video ('Asian mom...')? At the first point of action she seems to gag, but tries to pass it off as moaning. The dog is on his back, and every time he gets up, she puts him down again. In addition, I am not sure this is the way of sucking a dog's penis, or that the penis is even erect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
Could you have a look at the second video ('Asian mom...')? At the first point of action she seems to gag, but tries to pass it off as moaning. The dog is on his back, and every time he gets up, she puts him down again. In addition, I am not sure this is the way of sucking a dog's penis, or that the penis is even erect.
It is the same one removed in the post above you. :D Reported again.
I went ahead and reported several other crap clips from that thread too. Do not be afraid of reporting stuff like that.
 
Last edited:
It is the same one removed in the post above you. :D Reported again.
I went ahead and reported several other crap clips from that thread too. Do not be afraid of reporting stuff like that.
IMO that Camilla account seems like straight cancer. Their entire post history screams FORBIDDEN_WEBSITE!. I don't doubt that they will post many more vids like this.
 
IMO that Camilla account seems like straight cancer. Their entire post history screams FORBIDDEN_WEBSITE!. I don't doubt that they will post many more vids like this.
Feel free to report those. :D 3 bad ones and he is making a new account. :D
 
Do not be afraid of reporting bait videos either. Use this to justify removing content that uses food to trick animals into sexual stuff. I consider that wrong and bad porn and we certainly do not need to see that.
 

4:40, 7:40 the horse has his hind legs bound together. 11:14, 13:51 front legs bound too. The entire horse is bound in place and completely prevented from moving.
Are you kidding me? Do you consider that good porn? That is animal abuse and basically rape.

On top of that it is classic commercial crap porn. The horse is also bound in the front, there is no excitement on his part, there is lots of rubbing and shoving the limp penis into places and he is getting soft more of the time than hard. Obviously the actress is not a zoophile absolutely at all. And there is a mare in front of him because obviously the actress knows nothing about how to get a horse hard.

Horse people feel free to review the rest of @vitaliijn threads he asks for a lot of commercial crap.
 
@dartel I saw your "commercial crap" post on that thread mentioned above. Here you can see reporting that crap is worth it. Reports are anonymous unless you decide to post about it. So please next time, consider reporting the abusive commercial animal rape.
 
@dartel I saw your "commercial crap" post on that thread mentioned above. Here you can see reporting that crap is worth it. Reports are anonymous unless you decide to post about it. So please next time, consider reporting the abusive commercial animal rape.
I didn't view it, just the link thumbnail was enough to know what crap it was.
 
Back
Top