• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The abusive porn cleanup project

I have found abusive content in the past:

  • Total voters
    1,695
Can we get some of the horse people to analyze this video and report it with explanation if you find reportable content.
It is a tough one. It is obviously commercial crap, it has fake cum and some other bad things, but I think it needs better debunking to make the report convincing. You can skip the first 7 minutes.

In my opinion:
This is basically horse orgasm denial and a guide on how to sexually frustrate a stallion to oblivion. Any time the horse attempts to hump, he is stopped and he has a mare in front of him to keep him horny.
That is pretty bad to be honest. Obviously they need a mare since the lame actress has no idea what to do and the horse does not want anything to do with her. Finished off with the usual shove an almost limp dick in an orifice and moan. Both horses are bound in place on top of that. Ended with a fake cumshot at 30:06.
Notice that nowhere before this "cumshots" was there any humping, flare or proper sexual excitement. And there is an mysterious cut right before the "cum" comes out.

Thanks.
 
A lot is wrong about this video. First and foremost you do no need to rape a dog to have sex with him.
The guy basically holds him in place the whole time of the "sucking", attempts to prevent any kind of movement and does not even know how to jerk him while the woman desperately tries to suck on his limp penis. The dog does not seem to be happy about it and tries to leave several times until the finally give up.
 
pes said:
A lot is wrong about this video. First and foremost you do no need to rape a dog to have sex with him.
The guy basically holds him in place the whole time of the "sucking", attempts to prevent any kind of movement and does not even know how to jerk him while the woman desperately tries to suck on his limp penis. The dog does not seem to be happy about it and tries to leave several times until the finally give up.
Click to expand...
Just watched it... Yep i see that clearly theres no need for 2 people to hold him. His body motions look troubled/nervous. If people imagine if they were that dog would they want that treatment
 
pes said:
Can we get some of the horse people to analyze this video and report it with explanation if you find reportable content.
It is a tough one. It is obviously commercial crap, it has fake cum and some other bad things, but I think it needs better debunking to make the report convincing. You can skip the first 7 minutes.

In my opinion:
This is basically horse orgasm denial and a guide on how to sexually frustrate a stallion to oblivion. Any time the horse attempts to hump, he is stopped and he has a mare in front of him to keep him horny.
That is pretty bad to be honest. Obviously they need a mare since the lame actress has no idea what to do and the horse does not want anything to do with her. Finished off with the usual shove an almost limp dick in an orifice and moan. Both horses are bound in place on top of that. Ended with a fake cumshot at 30:06.
Notice that nowhere before this "cumshots" was there any humping, flare or proper sexual excitement. And there is an mysterious cut right before the "cum" comes out.

Thanks.
Click to expand...
From what I've seen I agree with what you and caikgoch commented in that thread. It can be explained as sexual torture, and then of course suppose the stallion would have dislocated her jaw, he would be cast aside as 'dangerous'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
Mannydc_17 said:
View attachment 73589
Click to expand...
18 likes, 3 love.
Are you kidding me? That dog definitely is not happy about that position. Have you read the rules?
She is sucking his limp dick. Now guys come on you know what an erect dog penis looks like.
The way she is sucking him is completely wrong an therefore there is NOT A SINGLE ERECTION in the entire video.
The "cumshot" at 0:18 is nonsense. The dog does not even have an erection and this is not what dog cum looks like.
Can you please explain to me what exactly made you choose this title 'good head to dog'?
Reported for animal abuse.
 
I am saving this here for later review since it has a lot of content:
If anyone else wants to review/report it before I get to it, feel free to do so.

At least some of these clips come from videos that have been reported and removed before due to animal abuse.
The first clip already shows someone holding the dog down in frame by his hind leg and a completely disgusted, poorly paid, nonzoophile actress. It is commercial crap porn, what else would we expect.
I will do a detailed review in the next few days.
 
pes said:
I am saving this here for later review since it has a lot of content:
If anyone else wants to review/report it before I get to it, feel free to do so.

At least some of these clips come from videos that have been reported and removed before due to animal abuse.
The first clip already shows someone holding the dog down in frame by his hind leg and a completely disgusted, poorly paid, nonzoophile actress. It is commercial crap porn, what else would we expect.
I will do a detailed review in the next few days.
Click to expand...
"Alright I seen enough" thats my review report. No need for a detailed just the first few secs was uncomfortable. Anyone with a mind can see its so fake as well as uncomfortable
 
Reconscope said:
"Alright I seen enough" thats my review report
Click to expand...
While mods do sometimes read this thread, please report specific abusive content using the Report button. That is the only sure way. And please put a description of what you find wrong in the video into the report. It makes things more obvious and easier.
 
pes said:
While mods do sometimes read this thread, please report specific abusive content using the Report button. That is the only sure way. And please put a description of what you find wrong in the video into the report. It makes things more obvious and easier.
Click to expand...
Coming from me its saying alot just by those words. No need for a legality notice or exact eyewitness report. Im very tolerent porn watcher so i know exactly how it is. If i was a mod i would definitely catch a eye from another's report with those few words
 
Reconscope said:
Coming from me its saying alot just by those words. No need for a legality notice or exact eyewitness report. Im very tolerent porn watcher so i know exactly how it is. If i was a mod i would definitely catch a eye from another's report with those few words
Click to expand...
Reports are not public. Only you and the mods know about them. It is much better to directly tell the mods this way then expect them to notice a post in this thread. They do not know how tolerant to porn you are or are not. Detailed reports help to provide the evidence of what and where is wrong making sure the mod that is reviewing the content does not accidentally miss something you saw.
 
pes said:
Reports are not public. Only you and the mods know about them. It is much better to directly tell the mods this way then expect them to notice a post in this thread. They do not know how tolerant to porn you are or are not. Detailed reports help to provide the evidence of what and where is wrong making sure the mod that is reviewing the content does not accidentally miss something you saw.
Click to expand...
Alright ill send them more details. This time ill put it properly. I mean really its dead obvious its abuse.

Look at it Asian girl grabbing k9 dick like shes paid as well as making him uncomfortable due to improper handling. I seen this WAYYYY too many times its too easy/generic to spot. If this was in questionable zone then sure its worth a look but this is dead obvious
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
Reconscope said:
Alright ill send them more details. This time ill put it properly. I mean really its dead obvious its abuse.

Look at it Asian girl grabbing k9 dick like shes paid as well as making him uncomfortable due to improper handling. I seen this WAYYYY too many times its too easy/generic to spot. If this was in questionable zone then sure its worth a look but this is dead obvious
Click to expand...
Thanks.
 
pes said:
Thanks.
Click to expand...
No problem. Given my reputation of analyzing porn too much

(infamous human lovers committee eludes me to this day on those female ferals did the human guys consent? ?? i mean their memories were wiped... But so did that "cat" guy too) off note but you get the idea
 
Reconscope said:
Alright ill send them more details.
Click to expand...
This forum would really benefit from more people doing this work regularly, daily. I know it is not easy, it is disgusting and maddening. But as you can see it is important and it is needed. There are threads that are years old and still contain abusive content. This should not be here and should not be tolerated.
 
pes said:
This forum would really benefit from more people doing this work regularly, daily. I know it is not easy, it is disgusting and maddening. But as you can see it is important and it is needed. There are threads that are years old and still contain abusive content. This should not be here and should not be tolerated.
Click to expand...
I mean i try not to be a porn watcher too hard ? i dont wanna feel like a perv. A couple times sure but after that im like "why am i here father?"
 
Reconscope said:
I mean i try not to be a porn watcher too hard ? i dont wanna feel like a perv. A couple times sure but after that im like "why am i here father?"
Click to expand...
Well this is hardly porn. :D The stuff that gets reported should not give anyone an erection.
 
pes said:
This forum would really benefit from more people doing this work regularly, daily. I know it is not easy, it is disgusting and maddening. But as you can see it is important and it is needed. There are threads that are years old and still contain abusive content. This should not be here and should not be tolerated.
Click to expand...
When I am online I do make a quick tour, but yeah, all too often it is disheartening to see what people are up to. Of course the porn-focused crowds will cast me aside as a sanctimonious snowflake or whatever, but I don't care. If I see abuse, or even when I have the suspicion of abuse, I report it and let the mods take their decision. For instance, I did watch that video where a dog was eating the peanut butter from a woman. For the dog it wasn't anything sexual, so you could argue that the dog was used as a sex toy. Anyway, the video got deleted.
 
AppleDash said:
When I am online I do make a quick tour, but yeah, all too often it is disheartening to see what people are up to. Of course the porn-focused crowds will cast me aside as a sanctimonious snowflake or whatever, but I don't care. If I see abuse, or even when I have the suspicion of abuse, I report it and let the mods take their decision. For instance, I did watch that video where a dog was eating the peanut butter from a woman. For the dog it wasn't anything sexual, so you could argue that the dog was used as a sex toy. Anyway, the video got deleted.
Click to expand...
Interesting. You reported it? Peanut butter is not against the rules and usually is not removed.
 
pes said:
Interesting. You reported it? Peanut butter is not against the rules and usually is not removed.
Click to expand...
Yes, I reported it to see what the mods would think of it. There is the ethical minefield of using food as a reward for sex. Here, it wasn't just the question whether peanut butter is harmful to dogs or not, but the fact that food was used. If there was no food used, would the dog still have done the same thing? There also is a mismatch between the person's experiences and the dog's experiences. The person gets sexually excited. The dog is just eating some free food with no sexual interpretations. To me, this shows that the person could just as well have used a cucumber or vibrating dildo to achieve the same state of sexual excitement. And this means that using food can just be seen as using an animal as a sexual toy, and I wanted to know what the moderating team would think of it.

Now that this clip has been removed, it might be useful to have some clarification in the forum rules why such clips are not accepted here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
AppleDash said:
Yes, I reported it to see what the mods would think of it. There is the ethical minefield of using food as a reward for sex. Here, it wasn't just the question whether peanut butter is harmful to dogs or not, but the fact that food was used. If there was no food used, would the dog still have done the same thing? There also is a mismatch between the person's experiences and the dog's experiences. The person gets sexually excited. The dog is just eating some free food with no sexual interpretations. To me, this shows that the person could just as well have used a cucumber or vibrating dildo to achieve the same state of sexual excitement. And this means that using food can just be seen as using an animal as a sexual toy, and I wanted to know what the moderating team would think of it.

Now that this clip has been removed, it might be useful to have some clarification in the forum rules why such clips are not accepted here.
Click to expand...
I obviously agree with that.
Ok good to know some mods remove it. Reporting peanut butter videos is worth it now.
AppleDash said:
Now that this clip has been removed, it might be useful to have some clarification in the forum rules why such clips are not accepted here.
Click to expand...
@FloofyNewfie @Oldman any official statement about this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top