25 likes, several praising comments.
@Oldman Another team russia video. Since the previous one was removed, I guess they are not allowed. Is that correct?
Thanks. Is this written in the rules? I do not see it there.
This is confusing. Commercial porn gets posted almost daily. It is very simple to distinguish from amateur content just by the way it is shot. How come that is not removed?
Reposting commercial content is mentioned in the rules. However a rule targeting Team Russia in particular does not exist. Although I probably should add them to the list even though "etc." should cover it.
As it stands, this is how the rule is listed...
By the way to anyone who reviews porn. This is a powerful tool for removing commercial crap porn from the forum. And it works even on posts where the porn is linked from another porn site as long as you can tell whether it fits into the commercial category as I just tested.
I agree, however most of the anal-related porn with dogs I have ever seen was abusive - the dogs were forced to do it or they just "tolerated" it.
But a lot of it at least with horses uses fake cum and bad handling which means it is reportable and usually removed especially if one of the horse people here support the report with more detailed explanations.
There is a group on the zooville matrix server called something like "uncensored anal". I suspect it will be full of abusive content simply based on the fact that the owner must have had some reason to put "uncensored" into the title/description. I have no had enough courage to go there yet though.
This does not look right to me. First the short leash around her neck is wrong. You should not need anything like that. Second I do not like the way the guy is handling her, holding her feet and especially at 3:04 that does not look like someone who loves animals. 3:12 is an indisputable proof of abuse. What follows after that is clear rape.
Probably not. I guess the thread just is removed. I did not get any notification from the mod, so I do not even know whether any warnings were issued. But from experience it is either none or just the author might have been warned.
I doubt that will happen.
They did get a warning, a first and final regarding doxing. He did explain why he posted, and the fact that the person did indeed express their desire through that social media, however, I have not seen that video as i will not create an account there. I am very convinced that this person will not be posting any social media form anyone ever again. He learned his lesson, if not, it will be a ban.
All of them? Every single user that liked the post or commented under it?
The video was an apology of someone who accidentally shared a zoo recording of themselves, got into trouble with the police and thankfully did not loose their dog. The woman was sad and scared. It was not porn and in fact she never meant to make zoo porn. It contained her personal information and the discussion bellow already had posts of people finding out her full name and other accounts and stalking her. This is not acceptable behavior in my opinion.
The notification system seems to be a bit broken right now. The last report notification I have is from "Tik tok girl loves her horses" which is a different thread. But thanks for trying, it makes it easier for me to evaluate which reports are useful.
