I have sort of the inverse perspective. Overwhelmingly the women I've dated and been most attracted to, and comfortable with, have been zoophiles. Two had very little or no experience with human males, another two were experienced all around, and another had limited experience with animals.
Bottom line? It wasn't the zoo aspect so much as the intense, uninhibited intimacy.
My last zoo partner, I "outed" our first time together, I could feel the "knot pocket", and apparently I came... a lot. Long/short, she let a comment slip that I picked up and the recognition was immediate. Our next time was even more intense, and although she had multiple orgasms before I had my first,, we routinely climaxed together.
That's pretty much in alignment with the rest of my relationships with zoophiles - intensely intimate.
But they're also intelligent, relatively independent, motivated, and tenacious. They've all had goals they pursued outside the relationship, and were all very physically attractive in one way or another (sexy/sultry vs cute vs pretty/traditionally "beautiful")
I had a brief encounter with a young woman from another forum and it was... weird. Her k9 experience had zero to do with the attraction, and the attraction was lacking. Not terribly intelligent, definitely not kindhearted, and very unmotivated.
So... YMMV?