Count to ∞!

[MrsShemon]

110689
? ?

 

[FoxandtheHounds]

110690

 

[MrsShemon]

110691

 

[son1911]

Actually repertoire hails from Latin in origin as well. Lol

It's most likely that anything that comes from French, being a Romance language and all that, can trace its origin in Latin. But repertoire and inventory haven't taken the straight path into the English language; they've both actually taken a detour through French. From an etymological point of view, it is important to take this into consideration because those detours tend to obscure both form and meaning of a word.

So what I'm actually trying to say is that if you don't bother with how the words entered the language, then there's no point to separate them into words of French or Latin origin. All would be Latin.

110692

 

[MrsShemon]

110693

Disceptationem tuam de linguis vere non sequor, sed gaudeo te omnes ludibrio habere.

 

[FoxandtheHounds]

110694

 

[MrsShemon]

110695

 

[FoxandtheHounds]

110696

 

[MrsShemon]

110697

 

[FoxandtheHounds]

110698

 

[son1911]

110699
Floofy will be very displeased.

 

[FoxandtheHounds]

110700

110699
Floofy will be very displeased.

Ahhh heck you're right... I wasn't watching the numbers. My bad @FloofyNewfie

 

[MrsShemon]

110701

Floofy will be very displeased.

Why?

 

[FoxandtheHounds]

110702

110701


Why?

Everytime we get into the 69x numbers we usually have a smut round and post some. We messed it up this time, the smut king will be displeased.

 

[MrsShemon]

110703

Everytime we get into the 69x numbers we usually have a smut round and post some. We messed it up this time, the smut king will be displeased.

Oh no ? we angered the Smut King!

 

[son1911]

110704
I have no smut to appease him with. ?

 

[MrsShemon]

110705

Me neither, but I Google search to honour traditions.

 

[son1911]

110706
I'm ready for my divine punishment.

 

[littleblonde]

110708

 

[YanchaOkami]

110709

Oh, we can still add smut - it's just not a 69 number right now.
Here's some smut for the horny feral lovers.

Don't bonk me please, if any of those is somewhat against the rules, like "size difference" - that's something I don't have influence over, merely the artists imagination.. (and remember: those are neither real, nor abstractly different sizes).

Spoiler: Smut selection

 

[son1911]

110710
Well done, @YanchaOkami ! That'll surely please the Floof.

 

[YanchaOkami]

110711

That'll surely please the Floof.

Thank you, thank you.

By the way: from my analysis of body language signs the third image I posted might be somewhat.. weird. I just noticed the facial features of the dog (wolf?) and she's clearly showing aggressive signs, by the ripples on back of her snout and blinking teeth. Okay, her flews are not pulled up and the ears are non-aggressively upwards, at least something positive.

But with this facial expression a dog would usually just bite the one doing that to her. And show further signs of distress. No idea what the artist thought by drawing it. Maybe: "Oh, she's not satisfied.." - but in reality this looks waaaays different. ?‍

Ripples on the back of the snout are a very, very bad sign, together with growling. Even worse than just lowered ears.

 

[Tom61294014]

110712

 

[son1911]

110713
Maybe the artist isn't fluent in dog language.

 

[MrsShemon]

110714

 

[son1911]

110715

 

[YanchaOkami]

110716

.. Maybe the artist isn't fluent in dog language.

Yes, that's mostly the case. Same goes for .. weirdly drawn out feral genitals and such, but quite often those are as well freedom of interpretation, even if the artist knows how they look in real life.

 

[MrsShemon]

110717

 

[son1911]

110718
Exaggerated genitals are a must in the smut genre. Otherwise we wouldn't be able to see what was going on. ?️

 

[MrsShemon]

110719

To me, realistic feels more "right"
(Yes I know that my smuts have been highly unrealistic)