SnowWolf96
Citizen of Zooville
141546
141547
141548
SnowWolf96
Citizen of Zooville
141549
SnowWolf96
Citizen of Zooville
141551
And no boss, it's just a Pokémon (shiny dusk form Lycanroc), that one of my friends drew up for me @FloofyNewfie
And no boss, it's just a Pokémon (shiny dusk form Lycanroc), that one of my friends drew up for me @FloofyNewfie
141 double 5 single 2
Well... I knew it was from Pokémon, I was just wondering if it was smut, since the character seems to be doing the "slutty tongue" thing. Lol
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
141553
*Brrrr* - awake again. Life's wonderful without idiotic friends. With them, not so much.
Abstract world view without the slightest link to realism is one of the more common problems in real life with humans right now. Projecting their own individual problems to anything and everyone around them, just not to themself.
*Brrrr* - awake again. Life's wonderful without idiotic friends. With them, not so much.
Abstract world view without the slightest link to realism is one of the more common problems in real life with humans right now. Projecting their own individual problems to anything and everyone around them, just not to themself.
Last edited:
SnowWolf96
Citizen of Zooville
141 555-FLOOFY ?
This is why aliens won't visit us...
This is why aliens won't visit us...
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
141556
Lol, manga drawing people overdoing the hentai part of their life.
Lol, manga drawing people overdoing the hentai part of their life.
1415 Heinz 57
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
141558
Good evening Floofer! ?
Hope your day is good so far and you've lots of time for your two cute girls! ?
Quite cold here, 3°C right now. But finally dressed up, three layers of clothing. A necessity to prevent infections.
Probably biking to my heated storage later on, but have to do some stuff here beforehand. Which needs daylight, as such 4,5 more hours of sorting, cleaning recycled things and checking, dismantling them. And cleaning my transport bags, they got quite messy by all this dusty stuff.
That's life.. What are you doing in terms of private efforts and projects, my good floofer?
Edit: Oh, hello DaneFloofer, just saw your reaction! I wish you a wonderful day as well!
Good evening Floofer! ?
Hope your day is good so far and you've lots of time for your two cute girls! ?
Quite cold here, 3°C right now. But finally dressed up, three layers of clothing. A necessity to prevent infections.
Probably biking to my heated storage later on, but have to do some stuff here beforehand. Which needs daylight, as such 4,5 more hours of sorting, cleaning recycled things and checking, dismantling them. And cleaning my transport bags, they got quite messy by all this dusty stuff.
That's life.. What are you doing in terms of private efforts and projects, my good floofer?
Edit: Oh, hello DaneFloofer, just saw your reaction! I wish you a wonderful day as well!
Last edited:
141559
It's been unseasonably warm here, but it's only supposed to last a couple more days. Then it'll get back down to around more normal temps.
It's also been hella busy at work, painfully busy. Ugg.
Hope all is well with the Yanch Foxxo? Well... besides the cold that is.
It's been unseasonably warm here, but it's only supposed to last a couple more days. Then it'll get back down to around more normal temps.
It's also been hella busy at work, painfully busy. Ugg.
Hope all is well with the Yanch Foxxo? Well... besides the cold that is.
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
141560
Oh, unseasonable warm.. I would welcome temperatures which were 5°C hotter between August and April and 10-14°C hotter between October and February.. but I would have to move to Italys coastal regions then. That's not my goal. And surely it's still a problematic aspect for world ecology and life if overall temperatures raise because it changes a lot of fundamental cyclic activities of nature itself (not so much of the humans, but they'll suffer through them anyway).
We had this quite intense the last five years in Germany, the amount of "just rain" which went to "half the city is flooded" happened in so many usually unproblematic regions. And having a blizzard with hail in the middle of April happened once as well - looked like a trip to Siberia in October. ?
Was cold enough to actually freeze your lungs if you stayed outside for hours without air filtering through clothes. And this is quite painful even at the beginning. -20°C and lower.
How warm is it in your region right now those days?
For me all is well in some way. Aside usual health problems, but I didn't die again the recent years, as such.. that's a win?
Need to start my weight and bodybuilding sports again, lost the motivation due to what happened the recent months. But that's quickly recovered.
Those hiking mountain boots are weird. They don't exactly keep my feet warm. Even with all this material. Should've bought real leather insulated ones instead of Goretex.
Oh, unseasonable warm.. I would welcome temperatures which were 5°C hotter between August and April and 10-14°C hotter between October and February.. but I would have to move to Italys coastal regions then. That's not my goal. And surely it's still a problematic aspect for world ecology and life if overall temperatures raise because it changes a lot of fundamental cyclic activities of nature itself (not so much of the humans, but they'll suffer through them anyway).
We had this quite intense the last five years in Germany, the amount of "just rain" which went to "half the city is flooded" happened in so many usually unproblematic regions. And having a blizzard with hail in the middle of April happened once as well - looked like a trip to Siberia in October. ?
Was cold enough to actually freeze your lungs if you stayed outside for hours without air filtering through clothes. And this is quite painful even at the beginning. -20°C and lower.How warm is it in your region right now those days?
For me all is well in some way. Aside usual health problems, but I didn't die again the recent years, as such.. that's a win?
Need to start my weight and bodybuilding sports again, lost the motivation due to what happened the recent months. But that's quickly recovered.
Those hiking mountain boots are weird. They don't exactly keep my feet warm. Even with all this material. Should've bought real leather insulated ones instead of Goretex.
141561
Ehh... I try to keep more specific details of my area off of the public forum. Now, it would be fairly unlikely that stating the exact temperature would identify my exact location, but you never know. People have been doxxed from information you wouldn't ever think would be identifiable.
Ehh... I try to keep more specific details of my area off of the public forum. Now, it would be fairly unlikely that stating the exact temperature would identify my exact location, but you never know. People have been doxxed from information you wouldn't ever think would be identifiable.
Dogstudlover
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
141563
Good morning everyone ?
Good morning everyone ?
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
141564
Hmm, more specific - okay, but "actual temperature" is usually as unspecific as it goes.
Because it's measured by more-or-less precise hardware and more-or-less measurement points in an area. As such I could state the temperature here at one number behind the comma and nobody would be able to link it to anything. This temperature might right now persist in 1/12th of earths surface areas somewhere in some depth / height / regions.
(Because if you're either near a river, near a sea, a hill, mountain, a windy area or a natural hotter place with earth temperatures influencing the measure points, it's even compared to one measurement point in 2 km distance like 2°C difference.)
Not to mention the different forecasts and temperature measurements between different analyzing weather portals, hehe.
But anyway, no need to state it if you don't want to. I know that details can lead to doxxing (even as it would be hard in my case as even doxxing needs a real address.. and not just "somewhere in this area of land!", that's like doxxing a fish), as I was data security manager for several companies in the past.
The other stuff is usually more problematic. Like: images you post (you don't, which is good). If you have a generative time, a shadow, a sun position or stars visible and a rough idea where it could be located by the surroundings visible or prior postings, this could just end in "GeoDoxxers" instead of "GeoGuesser".
There's always the aspect: what can others see? - in real life. Like tattoos. Which might be known by someone. And he tells this around. Or specific abnormal details of the body, but at the end.. that's all not enough without a common base of people which -know- about them and identify them. In all-day life people don't care much about specific little remarks of life on another person's visible parts. While tattoos or piercings stand out quite a lot and get recognized, scars don't easily do. But there might be pictures of them, that's sometimes a problem (with social networks even more due to third persons posting them).
Anyway, gonna give the "GeoDoxxers" some funny lost time: It's 4,3 °C right now and the sun will rise at roughly 7:24 AM. Which is quite precise location information. ? But does still cover ten-thousands of acres. And I won't post pictures of the stars.
@Dogstudlover : Welcome cute Dogstudfloofer! ? ?
Hmm, more specific - okay, but "actual temperature" is usually as unspecific as it goes.
Because it's measured by more-or-less precise hardware and more-or-less measurement points in an area. As such I could state the temperature here at one number behind the comma and nobody would be able to link it to anything. This temperature might right now persist in 1/12th of earths surface areas somewhere in some depth / height / regions.
(Because if you're either near a river, near a sea, a hill, mountain, a windy area or a natural hotter place with earth temperatures influencing the measure points, it's even compared to one measurement point in 2 km distance like 2°C difference.)
Not to mention the different forecasts and temperature measurements between different analyzing weather portals, hehe.
But anyway, no need to state it if you don't want to. I know that details can lead to doxxing (even as it would be hard in my case as even doxxing needs a real address.. and not just "somewhere in this area of land!", that's like doxxing a fish), as I was data security manager for several companies in the past.
The other stuff is usually more problematic. Like: images you post (you don't, which is good). If you have a generative time, a shadow, a sun position or stars visible and a rough idea where it could be located by the surroundings visible or prior postings, this could just end in "GeoDoxxers" instead of "GeoGuesser".
There's always the aspect: what can others see? - in real life. Like tattoos. Which might be known by someone. And he tells this around. Or specific abnormal details of the body, but at the end.. that's all not enough without a common base of people which -know- about them and identify them. In all-day life people don't care much about specific little remarks of life on another person's visible parts. While tattoos or piercings stand out quite a lot and get recognized, scars don't easily do. But there might be pictures of them, that's sometimes a problem (with social networks even more due to third persons posting them).
Anyway, gonna give the "GeoDoxxers" some funny lost time: It's 4,3 °C right now and the sun will rise at roughly 7:24 AM. Which is quite precise location information. ?
But does still cover ten-thousands of acres. And I won't post pictures of the stars. @Dogstudlover : Welcome cute Dogstudfloofer! ? ?
Dogstudlover
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
141565
I think just reading your paragraph would deter any Doxxers?
I think just reading your paragraph would deter any Doxxers?
thatdogger
Lurker
141567
141569
. 
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
141569+1
Smut is at the end.
They are usually (if they're interested in finding out a location) motivated by such writings, as they estimate that the other one doesn't know about their own possibilities. And there are a lot of anti's or even just plain haters which want to take judgement in their own hands. It's all well-known. Being active in several anti-groups for decades (being a zoophile, but I love to know my self-declared enemies).
Information I post over all the time are with some wanted and willing imprecise data fields in it. Like randomizing. Not to lie, but to falsify the approach of overall analytics. It will cause less precise approach by widening the bandwidth of data fields.
I'm not living like the usual person in a rent flat or building. I could be here. Or there. I have keys and ways of access of places which don't even know my names. Multiple areas which are only known to singular numbers of people which don't communicate about them. Even the police wouldn't necessarily find me easily. And that's a good thing, I like privacy.
The most sensitive data would be the internet connection, actually. But it's booked on another non-existing name, paid locally. And doesn't stay online (no energy source) if I move around, nor do I take my linked devices with me all the time. I keep them well-hidden at those times, quite far away. No "smartphone where you go", neither a smartphone OS which could collect the "usual amount" of data.
Comes with less comfort, still not paranoid if it actually was the job to prevent such things and I know unfortunately what is possible.. It's easy to understand triangulation, recognizable tx/rx power spectrums, linking by network interferences, open network access. Satellite imagery possibilities, airspace surveillance. And hard to prevent smartphone OS data collection nowadays. Still somewhat possible.
The latter one resembles exactly why work safety measures forbid open fire in combusting environments. ?
Smut is at the end.
They are usually (if they're interested in finding out a location) motivated by such writings, as they estimate that the other one doesn't know about their own possibilities. And there are a lot of anti's or even just plain haters which want to take judgement in their own hands. It's all well-known. Being active in several anti-groups for decades (being a zoophile, but I love to know my self-declared enemies).
Information I post over all the time are with some wanted and willing imprecise data fields in it. Like randomizing. Not to lie, but to falsify the approach of overall analytics. It will cause less precise approach by widening the bandwidth of data fields.
I'm not living like the usual person in a rent flat or building. I could be here. Or there. I have keys and ways of access of places which don't even know my names. Multiple areas which are only known to singular numbers of people which don't communicate about them. Even the police wouldn't necessarily find me easily. And that's a good thing, I like privacy.
The most sensitive data would be the internet connection, actually. But it's booked on another non-existing name, paid locally. And doesn't stay online (no energy source) if I move around, nor do I take my linked devices with me all the time. I keep them well-hidden at those times, quite far away. No "smartphone where you go", neither a smartphone OS which could collect the "usual amount" of data.
Comes with less comfort, still not paranoid if it actually was the job to prevent such things and I know unfortunately what is possible.. It's easy to understand triangulation, recognizable tx/rx power spectrums, linking by network interferences, open network access. Satellite imagery possibilities, airspace surveillance. And hard to prevent smartphone OS data collection nowadays. Still somewhat possible.
The latter one resembles exactly why work safety measures forbid open fire in combusting environments. ?
Last edited:
141571
Woot, just walked a whole 1 mile (1.61 km) with the doggy girls.
The main reason I like to keep myself as anonymous as possible is the very fact that there are groups, often in the several hundreds but sometimes in the thousands that hunt zoos. 1 person looking to dox a zoo isn't much of a threat unless you really fuck up and make yourself exposed. But gather, say, 442 anti-zoos working together to find bits and pieces of information could in turn slowly make up the picture by adding a few pixels at a time, slowly but collectively. Eventually enough pixels could be found which allows the picture to be interpreted for what it is.
You might think I'm a little too paranoid, and maybe I am just a little... but it was due to tiny little, on the surface seemingly insignificant, pieces of information all shared amongst a large group of zoo hunters, all working together, which lead to the doxxing of Toggles the rat. It was also due to a large collective group that the person that went around violently assaulting people at Trump rallies was doxxed. He thought a face mask and heavy hooded clothing was enough, but enough people were determined to figure out who he was, and little by little the pieces added up until his true identity was matched.
It's cases like these which makes me a bit gunshy to share ANY information that could, on the surface, seem insignificant. But to someone malicious is merely a pixel they can they can add to the pool, eventually leading to the whole picture being uncovered. Me being an administrator on the largest zoophiles forum currently around would likely make me a pretty good target for such a collective attack.
Woot, just walked a whole 1 mile (1.61 km) with the doggy girls.
The main reason I like to keep myself as anonymous as possible is the very fact that there are groups, often in the several hundreds but sometimes in the thousands that hunt zoos. 1 person looking to dox a zoo isn't much of a threat unless you really fuck up and make yourself exposed. But gather, say, 442 anti-zoos working together to find bits and pieces of information could in turn slowly make up the picture by adding a few pixels at a time, slowly but collectively. Eventually enough pixels could be found which allows the picture to be interpreted for what it is.
You might think I'm a little too paranoid, and maybe I am just a little... but it was due to tiny little, on the surface seemingly insignificant, pieces of information all shared amongst a large group of zoo hunters, all working together, which lead to the doxxing of Toggles the rat. It was also due to a large collective group that the person that went around violently assaulting people at Trump rallies was doxxed. He thought a face mask and heavy hooded clothing was enough, but enough people were determined to figure out who he was, and little by little the pieces added up until his true identity was matched.
It's cases like these which makes me a bit gunshy to share ANY information that could, on the surface, seem insignificant. But to someone malicious is merely a pixel they can they can add to the pool, eventually leading to the whole picture being uncovered. Me being an administrator on the largest zoophiles forum currently around would likely make me a pretty good target for such a collective attack.
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
141572
Yes, as an administrator that might be quite right in terms of "being a target". But usually weather data has no real effect, if it isn't continuously monitored.
You know the removal of the flags by Shia LaB. aka the "HeWillNotDivideUs" event surely. With just one stand-still image which has not even any recognizable (weather / daytime linked) creation date of the file, people would not be able to find it precisely. Except if it's visible from outside, as once was the case from what I read about.
Always a high risk. Same as sexual activities with dogs in well-visible areas outside, that would be a bad idea.
About paranoia: as long as it's fact-based it's never paranoia. As the reasons exist. If you know the possibilities well enough, you are not paranoid to be cautious in their regards, as the possibilities are physically proven.
Instead those which ignore the risks (the most people, nowadays - unfortunately) and just click away "yes, I accept!" any time are actually the ones which I would say are at least unable to grasp those real risks. Or worse: they ignore high risks due to a wrong understanding of those. Or even worse: they ignore them willingly, because "doesn't matter" - which is as ignorant and - if not mentally challenged - at least dangerous as it gets.
But I am fine with whatever you decide in terms of personal data. I wouldn't post personal data which can lead to my recognizing as well, even if some of my pictures might seem like they could (they can't, as I actually photograph them on specifically set-up or common areas which are not usually existent and recognizable at my places).
Everyone has to decide themself how much care is relevant. And if I see people actually posting full body or face pictures of themself, even more in porn media.. that's like: "either it's not them (most of the time) or there's absolutely no idea to what this could lead".
And about the anti-groups: they are sometimes ways bigger. I'm in one which has a few thousand participants which collect snippets of data and even use AI recognizing for people which are not careful enough with personal body images. Like written: know your self-declared enemies.. it's important.
On the other hand it is for those really problematic to find data which is falsifying or raising the value bandwidth of specific data that could be linked to it, as it sets the level from "could be here" to "could be here.. and here.. and here.. and.. or even almost everywhere if the other values are as well not as accurate as they were thought to be, who knows".
As well there's basically no risk for me, aside from people personally attacking. Law? Not so much. But I still like my privacy very highly, that's for sure.
Yes, as an administrator that might be quite right in terms of "being a target". But usually weather data has no real effect, if it isn't continuously monitored.
You know the removal of the flags by Shia LaB. aka the "HeWillNotDivideUs" event surely. With just one stand-still image which has not even any recognizable (weather / daytime linked) creation date of the file, people would not be able to find it precisely. Except if it's visible from outside, as once was the case from what I read about.
Always a high risk. Same as sexual activities with dogs in well-visible areas outside, that would be a bad idea.
About paranoia: as long as it's fact-based it's never paranoia. As the reasons exist. If you know the possibilities well enough, you are not paranoid to be cautious in their regards, as the possibilities are physically proven.
Instead those which ignore the risks (the most people, nowadays - unfortunately) and just click away "yes, I accept!" any time are actually the ones which I would say are at least unable to grasp those real risks. Or worse: they ignore high risks due to a wrong understanding of those. Or even worse: they ignore them willingly, because "doesn't matter" - which is as ignorant and - if not mentally challenged - at least dangerous as it gets.
But I am fine with whatever you decide in terms of personal data. I wouldn't post personal data which can lead to my recognizing as well, even if some of my pictures might seem like they could (they can't, as I actually photograph them on specifically set-up or common areas which are not usually existent and recognizable at my places).
Everyone has to decide themself how much care is relevant. And if I see people actually posting full body or face pictures of themself, even more in porn media.. that's like: "either it's not them (most of the time) or there's absolutely no idea to what this could lead".
And about the anti-groups: they are sometimes ways bigger. I'm in one which has a few thousand participants which collect snippets of data and even use AI recognizing for people which are not careful enough with personal body images. Like written: know your self-declared enemies.. it's important.
On the other hand it is for those really problematic to find data which is falsifying or raising the value bandwidth of specific data that could be linked to it, as it sets the level from "could be here" to "could be here.. and here.. and here.. and.. or even almost everywhere if the other values are as well not as accurate as they were thought to be, who knows".
As well there's basically no risk for me, aside from people personally attacking. Law? Not so much. But I still like my privacy very highly, that's for sure.
M
MrsShemon
Guest
141574
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
141575
Welcome to the both lovely Yimby-Floof and Mrs Shemon! ? ?
Usually it's enough for me to give things which don't matter -that- much in their precise numbers a variety, no need to plain out state wrong ones. If it's that risky and I don't want to state it, I can just keep it to myself.
Like saying: I fly sometimes with a private plane. That's true. But I won't tell you which model it is or where it starts / lands.
Welcome to the both lovely Yimby-Floof and Mrs Shemon! ?
? Usually it's enough for me to give things which don't matter -that- much in their precise numbers a variety, no need to plain out state wrong ones. If it's that risky and I don't want to state it, I can just keep it to myself.
Like saying: I fly sometimes with a private plane. That's true. But I won't tell you which model it is or where it starts / lands.