• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Are you a zoo or a bestialist?

Are you a zoo or a bestialist?

  • Total voters
    761
I love animals, I share a strong empathy with them & a deep love for them! However, when it comes sexual... I am straight up only interested in the their cock & fucking. I'm not sexually attracted much to the entirety of the animal, a bit to horses tho. So that would make me a bestialist if I had to put a label on it. Though I could imagine a deeper emotional bond formed over time doing such intimate acts with an animal. I don't particularly feel a need to put a label on it tho, I have strong sexual interests in some animals, I generally love all animals too, I just see it as not only a sexual 'fetish' but another way for humans to connect with animals, communicate, share energies, make bonds, a mutual enjoyment. I think its perfectly natural to bond and connect with animals this way.
 
I would say I was bestialist in the past, and didn't really feel like I had found my place in zoo where I belonged.
As I've been thinking a lot about this recently, I would say I'm now more interested and ready to explore my true feelings which would I guess make me zoo under your guidelines. How that ends up I really can't say yet, but I'm hoping I can say Zoo for sure in the future.
 
I consider myself a zoo as I'm sexually attracted to animals as well as wanting to form a loving mutual relationship with them. However, I haven't actually had sex with an animal before.
 
Zoo.
Regardless of species, I am demisexual towards someone (2 or 4 legs) and need a relationship bond in order to be intimate with them.
 
ILoveZooGirlsXXX said:
I would say I was bestialist in the past, and didn't really feel like I had found my place in zoo where I belonged.
As I've been thinking a lot about this recently, I would say I'm now more interested and ready to explore my true feelings which would I guess make me zoo under your guidelines. How that ends up I really can't say yet, but I'm hoping I can say Zoo for sure in the future.
Click to expand...

Like that. I only ever was into bestiality, I thought, but over the past year (a round about), I realized that I'm not just sexually attracted to animals.
But I'm neither exlusively attracted to animals. I'm bi for humans and animals (and bi in general, but hell xD)
 
I call myself a zoo/zoophile out of a sort of prescriptivist attachment to it just meaning sexual attraction to other species. I haven't had a romantic bond w an animal to date but I have had more affection for my beast lovers than my human fuckbuddies. I'm a cockslut who happily has sex without love... but also a big fat romantic w the right partner.

I kind of consider bestialist to mean someone who fucks animals for convenience (the lonely farmer stereotype) or money (pro/studio beast porn actresses & actors)
 
I consider myself zoo. I've had what I would consider a semi romantic relationship with a k9 girl. Sadly she has passed away at a young age. She showed me in particular a very high level of affection compared to other individuals. It would probably happen again in future animals given the chance.
 
I'm not sure how to define myself I said other because I don't think I have an emotional or romantic attachment and I don't have any reason other than it feels good. But I am a bit of an adrenaline junky.
 
Jese said:
zoophilia beastiality, whats the difference?
Click to expand...

it's a distinction we try to make to show the world outside that some people are interested only in the sex part of it and some are invested in the animal entirely, enjoying all aspects of taking care of an animal throughout their life.

it's a distinction we try to make that is quite probably entirely lost on the world outside, because all they see are animal rapists no matter what we do. :/
 
I think it's a mix of both. It has an important sexual connotation for me, but it doesn't imply that it's meaningless or that there can't be a bond.
 
Here's a question and please don't go all judgeMENTAL on me for asking it: With this community, some people look down on members who have sexual relationships with animals (they own or don't) without having emotional connections/relationships with those animals yet in human society we have whats called hook-up culture which is perfectly acceptable the majority now a days (specially the college aged folks, though they do tend to cry rape the following morning) so is it really some thing different to offer a stray food and then have sex with them without emotion or a plans to see them again than it is to meet some one at a club, buy them a drink and then have sex without emotion or plans to see them again? Also consider that many animals have NO emotional connection to their own species, like say cats who come together to breed and then avoid each other after (males some times even kill kittens). Is it different because humans are considered a monogamy species (despite science proving our biology suggests otherwise), or some religious concept butting its head in, or some thing else?
Please keep in mind I'm not knocking any one's feelings on the matter or trying to derail the thread, I just always have this question when I see this sort of discussion.
 
FeralGuy said:
Here's a question and please don't go all judgeMENTAL on me for asking it: With this community, some people look down on members who have sexual relationships with animals (they own or don't) without having emotional connections/relationships with those animals yet in human society we have whats called hook-up culture which is perfectly acceptable the majority now a days (specially the college aged folks, though they do tend to cry rape the following morning) so is it really some thing different to offer a stray food and then have sex with them without emotion or a plans to see them again than it is to meet some one at a club, buy them a drink and then have sex without emotion or plans to see them again? Also consider that many animals have NO emotional connection to their own species, like say cats who come together to breed and then avoid each other after (males some times even kill kittens). Is it different because humans are considered a monogamy species (despite science proving our biology suggests otherwise), or some religious concept butting its head in, or some thing else?
Please keep in mind I'm not knocking any one's feelings on the matter or trying to derail the thread, I just always have this question when I see this sort of discussion.
Click to expand...

I think most zoophiles who look down on people who're just into animals for the sex do so, because they tend to think that people who're just after sex abuse the animals.
There's quite some overlap with the arguments of people who're against sex with animals in general, stuff like "you're just abusing natural behaviourpatterns of the animal" or "you're taking advantage of a creature that doesn't know what it's doing".
Especially the second argument (or kind of argument, no matter how one does frame/formulate it) is galling, if it is used by a zoophile, since zoophiles tend to see more intelligence and consciousness in animals than most people. If someone like that then explains a being he/she claims is capable of romantic love or proper relationships isn't capable of just fucking, well that's plain strange.
Another origin of looking down onto bestiality by zoophiles is plain arrogance. "what you're doing is lesser and thus sullying what I'm doing" kind of thinking.

I'm not saying everyone is like that, I'm stating those are argumentative fundaments I've encountered and I'm expecting in some/many cases.
 
Sedirae said:
I think most zoophiles who look down on people who're just into animals for the sex do so, because they tend to think that people who're just after sex abuse the animals.
[...]
Another origin of looking down onto bestiality by zoophiles is plain arrogance. "what you're doing is lesser and thus sullying what I'm doing" kind of thinking.
Click to expand...

i think that's mostly it. they see it as something outsiders will look down on all of us for .... but they won't make the distinction between someone who has sex with an animal they feel they're in a committed relationship with and someone who has sex with any consenting animal. hell, they don't even make the distinction between animal rape and consensual sex between a human and an animal, because of course... "animals can't consent" ... *rolls eyes*
 
I would generally consider myself more of a bestialist, but im pretty aromantic. It takes me a ton of time and bonding to really form emotional attachments, whether with humans or animals, though admittedly animals can get through my shell much faster than people could.
 
zoo, if i were to have some horses i'll take hella care of them, share with them and only fuck if they want to and if so they wanted i have a lot of funny ideas to try
 
im a zoo but not zoo exclusive. but i still have my times where i have a quicky bestiality style. i treat it like i would humans for the most part. some people i get really attached too and some i dont. it happens the way it needs to happen in my opinion
 
I am zoo. I love my two mares, I feel happy in their company, and I do all to make them happy. And I am zoo exclusive. I am no longer interested in women.
 
I suppose by these definitions, I am leaning more towards bestialist. I don't really feel particularly romantic attachment to humans either though. I definitely bond emotionally with animals, but more platonic than romantic. Regardless of species, the closest I feel 'romantic' love would be like an intense, affectionate friendship love. I suppose I still call myself a zoophile, not only interpreting zoophilia as any attraction, but because it's no different to how I experience human love either.
 
Zoo50 said:
This poll is whether one identifies as zoo or bestialist.

Below are the definitions for "zoo" and "bestialist" provided by ZTHorse:

Bestialism - A sexual preference in which a person has consensual sex with animals but lacks affection or romantic feelings for the animal; A friends with benefits relationship. IE: John sees that bestialism has been growing in the zoo community over the years.

Bestialist - A person who practices bestialism. IE: John has been a bestialist for years.

Zoophile: A person whom forms emotional and romantic feelings for their animals. IE: John knew he was a zoophile when he first saw a mare.

Zoo - Shorten term for zoophile. IE: John is a great zoo.
Click to expand...
I am Pansexual, meaning bisexual with Humans and most animal species where it is safe for both involved parties to copulate.
 
1000% a zoo. I love my doggy girl with all of my heart. Our relationship and bond is the most important thing to me. And if someday is stops wanting sex or is unable to have it, it will never change the love I feel for her ❤️.
 
Bestialist here. For me, the exciting part is how instinctual it is for humans and animals to have sex. As humans, we have been taught that sex and emotions go hand-in-hand, even though we know that isn't true. I am fascinated by how our scents and how we present communicate with animals in ways we may not fully understand. That said, it should always be consensual and there is no place for abuse of any kind.
 
DaneLover1 said:
1000% a zoo. I love my doggy girl with all of my heart. Our relationship and bond is the most important thing to me. And if someday is stops wanting sex or is unable to have it, it will never change the love I feel for her ❤️.
Click to expand...
I envy that kind of love you have for her...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top