• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

[ZOOVILLE RULES]

I don't mean to attack, but rather to criticize. I don't look down on you as people, and if I get such thoughts, I don't express them. However, this site preaches character heavily (like the person who said I was a newbie speaking to long-time members and many of the rules that presumably arose from moral reasons [like incest or human-on-animal watersports]), so if it relies on it, I may as well point out how things might affect the perceived character. Not by saying you're an incel or something rude like that, but by saying that a lack of transparency and whatnot may reduce user trust. Also, why does it have to be a super secret vote? If you mean votes amongst mods and maybe paid supporters (who can be perceived like shareholders), that's understandable at least. But if elite members got the vote while others didn't, I don't agree with that.
No, the vote was meant more of as a joke. We held a vote between mods and admin during infancy of the forum and we decided not on scat as it has nothing to do with bestiality or zoo in our collective minds.
 
No, the vote was meant more of as a joke. We held a vote between mods and admin during infancy of the forum and we decided not on scat as it has nothing to do with bestiality or zoo in our collective minds.
Oh, I see. Your reasoning makes sense, I suppose. I can get by on the content allowed here while treating the moderators with common decency, despite any disagreements. Thanks for putting up with my heated debate instead of instantly banning me. I think this conversation has naturally cooled off now. Not fully resolved, but resolved enough to satisfy me. I don't need to be nosy about every psychological nook and cranny. I've learned more already, and learning even more won't really change anything. I've laid out my best arguments, and it changed nothing. This community is largely the passion project of the moderators, rather than aiming to be an all-encompassing public service. Staff are the flesh-blood of the site, and they get to have their own opinions as opposed to the opinions of their community. I'll only intervene on "free speech forums" or communities where staff promote being run on community opinion (like Old School RuneScape with its polls).
 
Last edited:
@dogluver101 @FloofyNewfie @FoxandtheHounds @Kombajnista @Mare Lover 1975 @Oldman @RoadWarrior @thebestguy @umafera
Mods☝️. When you are deleting a post with a tg/... username, always put the username in the search box as well.
Because usually it has been posted multiple times and quoted.
Then distribute as many points as needed.
Whenever I report one I always check their post history too. Which more often thsn not uncovers someone else who also responded to them, or posted on the same lurker profile.
 
@dogluver101 @FloofyNewfie @FoxandtheHounds @Kombajnista @Mare Lover 1975 @Oldman @RoadWarrior @thebestguy @umafera
Mods☝️. When you are deleting a post with a tg/... username, always put the username in the search box as well.
Because usually it has been posted multiple times and quoted.
Then distribute as many points as needed.
Indeed. I always try to remember to do so when dealing with an IM handle. Otherwise, they may end up getting an unnecessary warning strike from another mod for an infraction that occurred from around the same time as when they were first warned. I figure, delete all incidents and give warning strike telling them not to do it again would be more fair.

Although it is always funny when you search for someone's IM handle and it pulls results from a prior banned account. Lol
 
@dogluver101 @FloofyNewfie @FoxandtheHounds @Kombajnista @Mare Lover 1975 @Oldman @RoadWarrior @thebestguy @umafera
Mods☝️. When you are deleting a post with a tg/... username, always put the username in the search box as well.
Because usually it has been posted multiple times and quoted.
Then distribute as many points as needed.
I always check the offending users posts. That way I can delete all the instances of the idiot posting it. This usually also reveals more people doing the same, and more warnings handed out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
More just moving some stuff around. Copy and paste. No way I'm typing all of it from scratch. lol
Just a question if I may:
Rules prohibiting scat, necro, vore, gore and "call to action" are now gone. There may have been one mentioning blood, but I'm not sure. Scat and necro are covered in the "Zooville Chat" section, but all that used to be in a general forum discussion section. What happened to them?
 
Just a question if I may:
Rules prohibiting scat, necro, vore, gore and "call to action" are now gone. There may have been one mentioning blood, but I'm not sure. Scat and necro are covered in the "Zooville Chat" section, but all that used to be in a general forum discussion section. What happened to them?
I'll review them. I don't believe I changed much in the media rules section, as I think that's where most were.
 
i read the rules?!
No you did not:
 
You can not advertise your telegram username on the forum except where the rules allow it.
If you want to watermark your content, use something else. Thanks.
 
@FloofyNewfie since you were able to manually change the report template, would it be possible to change the cryptic sub 10 post error when joining a group to something clearly saying that you need to have a higher number of posts?
 
@FloofyNewfie since you were able to manually change the report template, would it be possible to change the cryptic sub 10 post error when joining a group to something clearly saying that you need to have a higher number of posts?
Ehhhhhhh..... I mean if I can find it, sure, I could maybe do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
Nah, I had to manually dig through all of the error message text in the language options until I found the right one.

The error message should look like this now:

View attachment 571311
The result of this is going to be threads asking, how many posts you need to have. :D Instead of what the hell is that message. Can it have links inside to the rules or the specific thread about pms and groups?
This has to be so simple that a dick pic can get it first try.
 
The result of this is going to be threads asking, how many posts you need to have. :D Instead of what the hell is that message. Can it have links inside to the rules or the specific thread about pms and groups?
This has to be so simple that a dick pic can get it first try.
Man, you gonna make me do a small amount of HTML coding now... Fine!!!! Lol

It should look like this now, clicking on the link will bring them to @Oldman's post about PM limitations:

Screenshot_20240610-192455~2.png
 
Man, you gonna make me do a small amount of HTML coding now... Fine!!!! Lol
*FloofieNewfie runs off in search of his page-worn HTML Handbook...finds it under his old, but cherished, Atari computer...blows the dust off it, sneezes and gets to work*
 
Back
Top