• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

[ZOOVILLE RULES]

Oldman said:
What part of we don't have to explain it to you do you not understand? In fact, we have explained it to you.

WE DON'T WANT IT HERE.
IT IS OUR FORUM

We allow questioning of the rules, but when you immediately go off the deep end with attacks on our character and our way of operating our website, you are going to get your ass handed to you by not only the mod team, but most likely by other members.
Click to expand...
I don't mean to attack, but rather to criticize. I don't look down on you as people, and if I get such thoughts, I don't express them. However, this site preaches character heavily (like the person who said I was a newbie speaking to long-time members and many of the rules that presumably arose from moral reasons [like incest or human-on-animal watersports]), so if it relies on it, I may as well point out how things might affect the perceived character. Not by saying you're an incel or something rude like that, but by saying that a lack of transparency and whatnot may reduce user trust.
 
Last edited:
pissyfart said:
To be fair, I guess all sexual or fetishistic acts with animals that make contact with them or extensions of them are pretty much just as physically dangerous. Just don't tell me rimming a dog or sticking your penis in their anus with no protection is safer. And IDK if enemas are safe for animals. Also, we haven't addressed psychological and circumstantial dangers. Dogs can be sent to shelters and killed for bestiality, but not for scat play. Additionally, a dog may respond to physical sexual contact with psychological consequences, but it has no capacity to understand what happens if a human interacts with its fecal matter in any way (unless there are olfactory triggers related to territory-marking or something if a human moves feces from the location, but at that rate, shoving your wiener in their face could be a different olfactory trigger, but IDK).
Click to expand...
You love editing your post when I'm in the middle of making one....

Since every dog is different, you don't know how they may be if you haven't been around them. Being around some I've done things with (not anal), they seemed fine. Treat them as any normal dog lover.
For most cases, you don't know what else that owner was doing to them. All you may hear is "a guy had sex with a dog" and claim the dog is scared, shaking, etc. You don't know what else the owner may have done. All the media will show is the dog is shaking because she was sexually harmed. Of course no one is going to say or ask him was he nice with her or him.

Personally, I knew someone who had a couple of dogs I lived with, and with this dudes abuse towards them. They mostly gave up coming to him for anything, and went to others including me. No, not for sex. But for anything else such as wanting out.
 
dogluver101 said:
You love editing your post when I'm in the middle of making one....

Since every dog is different, you don't know how they may be if you haven't been around them. Being around some I've done things with (not anal), they seemed fine. Treat them as any normal dog lover.
For most cases, you don't know what else that owner was doing to them. All you may hear is "a guy had sex with a dog" and claim the dog is scared, shaking, etc. You don't know what else the owner may have done. All the media will show is the dog is shaking because she was sexually harmed. Of course no one is going to say or ask him was he nice with her or him.

Personally, I knew someone who had a couple of dogs I lived with, and with this dudes abuse towards them. They mostly gave up coming to him for anything, and went to others including me. No, not for sex. But for anything else such as wanting out.
Click to expand...
I edit my posts because I may come off as rude or miss details, and it's considered bad etiquette on most forums to, say, necrobump or triple post. I apologize for any inconvenience.
 
pissyfart said:
I don't mean to attack, but rather to criticize. I don't look down on you as people, and if I get such thoughts, I don't express them. However, this site preaches character heavily (like the person who said I was a newbie speaking to long-time members and many of the rules that presumably arose from moral reasons [like incest or human-on-animal watersports]), so if it relies on it, I may as well point out how things might affect the perceived character. Not by saying you're an incel or something rude like that, but by saying that a lack of transparency and whatnot may reduce user trust. Also, why does it have to be a super secret vote? If you mean votes amongst mods and maybe paid supporters (who can be perceived like shareholders), that's understandable at least. But if elite members got the vote while others didn't, I don't agree with that.
Click to expand...
No, the vote was meant more of as a joke. We held a vote between mods and admin during infancy of the forum and we decided not on scat as it has nothing to do with bestiality or zoo in our collective minds.
 
Oldman said:
No, the vote was meant more of as a joke. We held a vote between mods and admin during infancy of the forum and we decided not on scat as it has nothing to do with bestiality or zoo in our collective minds.
Click to expand...
Oh, I see. Your reasoning makes sense, I suppose. I can get by on the content allowed here while treating the moderators with common decency, despite any disagreements. Thanks for putting up with my heated debate instead of instantly banning me. I think this conversation has naturally cooled off now. Not fully resolved, but resolved enough to satisfy me. I don't need to be nosy about every psychological nook and cranny. I've learned more already, and learning even more won't really change anything. I've laid out my best arguments, and it changed nothing. This community is largely the passion project of the moderators, rather than aiming to be an all-encompassing public service. Staff are the flesh-blood of the site, and they get to have their own opinions as opposed to the opinions of their community. I'll only intervene on "free speech forums" or communities where staff promote being run on community opinion (like Old School RuneScape with its polls).
 
Last edited:
pes said:
@dogluver101 @FloofyNewfie @FoxandtheHounds @Kombajnista @Mare Lover 1975 @Oldman @RoadWarrior @thebestguy @umafera
Mods☝️. When you are deleting a post with a tg/... username, always put the username in the search box as well.
Because usually it has been posted multiple times and quoted.
Then distribute as many points as needed.
Click to expand...
Whenever I report one I always check their post history too. Which more often thsn not uncovers someone else who also responded to them, or posted on the same lurker profile.
 
pes said:
@dogluver101 @FloofyNewfie @FoxandtheHounds @Kombajnista @Mare Lover 1975 @Oldman @RoadWarrior @thebestguy @umafera
Mods☝️. When you are deleting a post with a tg/... username, always put the username in the search box as well.
Because usually it has been posted multiple times and quoted.
Then distribute as many points as needed.
Click to expand...
Indeed. I always try to remember to do so when dealing with an IM handle. Otherwise, they may end up getting an unnecessary warning strike from another mod for an infraction that occurred from around the same time as when they were first warned. I figure, delete all incidents and give warning strike telling them not to do it again would be more fair.

Although it is always funny when you search for someone's IM handle and it pulls results from a prior banned account. Lol
 
pes said:
@dogluver101 @FloofyNewfie @FoxandtheHounds @Kombajnista @Mare Lover 1975 @Oldman @RoadWarrior @thebestguy @umafera
Mods☝️. When you are deleting a post with a tg/... username, always put the username in the search box as well.
Because usually it has been posted multiple times and quoted.
Then distribute as many points as needed.
Click to expand...
I always check the offending users posts. That way I can delete all the instances of the idiot posting it. This usually also reveals more people doing the same, and more warnings handed out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
dogluver101 said:
More just moving some stuff around. Copy and paste. No way I'm typing all of it from scratch. lol
Click to expand...
Just a question if I may:
Rules prohibiting scat, necro, vore, gore and "call to action" are now gone. There may have been one mentioning blood, but I'm not sure. Scat and necro are covered in the "Zooville Chat" section, but all that used to be in a general forum discussion section. What happened to them?
 
Kristy said:
Just a question if I may:
Rules prohibiting scat, necro, vore, gore and "call to action" are now gone. There may have been one mentioning blood, but I'm not sure. Scat and necro are covered in the "Zooville Chat" section, but all that used to be in a general forum discussion section. What happened to them?
Click to expand...
I'll review them. I don't believe I changed much in the media rules section, as I think that's where most were.
 
NightstarPrincess said:
i read the rules?!
Click to expand...
No you did not:

[ZOOVILLE RULES]

(Rules are subject to being updated over time. Click the Watch button at the top of this post to be notified of new posts in this thread.) Agreement to read and view adult material: The sites is designed and intended to be used by consenting adults - people who are at least 18 years old. Legal...
www.zoovilleforum.net www.zoovilleforum.net
 
You can not advertise your telegram username on the forum except where the rules allow it.
If you want to watermark your content, use something else. Thanks.
 
@FloofyNewfie since you were able to manually change the report template, would it be possible to change the cryptic sub 10 post error when joining a group to something clearly saying that you need to have a higher number of posts?
 
pes said:
@FloofyNewfie since you were able to manually change the report template, would it be possible to change the cryptic sub 10 post error when joining a group to something clearly saying that you need to have a higher number of posts?
Click to expand...
Ehhhhhhh..... I mean if I can find it, sure, I could maybe do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
FloofyNewfie said:
Nah, I had to manually dig through all of the error message text in the language options until I found the right one.

The error message should look like this now:

View attachment 571311
Click to expand...
The result of this is going to be threads asking, how many posts you need to have. :D Instead of what the hell is that message. Can it have links inside to the rules or the specific thread about pms and groups?
This has to be so simple that a dick pic can get it first try.
 
pes said:
The result of this is going to be threads asking, how many posts you need to have. :D Instead of what the hell is that message. Can it have links inside to the rules or the specific thread about pms and groups?
This has to be so simple that a dick pic can get it first try.
Click to expand...
Man, you gonna make me do a small amount of HTML coding now... Fine!!!! Lol

It should look like this now, clicking on the link will bring them to @Oldman's post about PM limitations:

Screenshot_20240610-192455~2.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top