Why do you want to?
I would like to be able to show other users that I like their content. I guess I would like to know why wouldn't you want too?
That explains why all the women are overweight that I've seen
BBW is for some completely mysterious reason popular nowadays.
That explains why men are seen as sexist, on here...
You already have this in the 5th post of the rules titled "helpful tips".
Why does the post you're replying to say no scat, but not the pinned? I wonder if they changed the rule.
There is no scat. Ever. Period. That will not change. We are not a shit forum, we are a zoo forum.
Zoo includes scat, and keeping a closed mind to content with animals that is even less dangerous than the regular old bestiality stuff here is dumb. Your staff can't even explain your reasoning. Human on animal isn't my thing, but I'm not asking it to be banned. Why ban scat because it's not the admins' thing? Zoo means sexual attraction to animals, and that includes their feces and them dedicating. This reasoning makes no sense whatsoever. At least make sense if you're going to impose such an arbitrary restriction.
Even fewer places to mingle with zoos who like scat for no known logical reason whatsoever, no? And these arguments don't prove any point.
No, it most certainly does not. Normal human attraction does not include their waste.
Normal human attraction does not include animals either. Get your bandwagon fallacy outta here.
Can you tell me where the fuck anywhere in the definition of zoo says scat..
Zoophilia means sexual attraction to animals. Sexual attraction to animals pooping is sexual attraction to animals, as I've sought content of animals pooping: not humans. Coprophiles aren't inherently zoophiles, and zoophiles aren't inherently coprophiles, so enjoyment can be separate. Like not all coprophiles are turned on by animals popping for a variety of reasons, one of them being because they're not zoophiles.
Did you know most bestiality laws include "anal" in their laws? They don't have to say scat or feces. They say anything with the animal.
It's odd to compare pedophilia and incest with scat, as the first two can cause severe psychological (and possibly physical) trauma to unwilling victims, whereas the ladder only offers diseases given unsafe practices. I'd get banning humans eating or touching animal scat (without some kind of protection [like gloves]) videos from the forum, as it's dangerous, human on animal scat is morally dubious, and human-only scat would be off-topic (and IDK why we even have a human-only channel), but solo animals pooping without human interference? This is so safe that it's allowed on YouTube, but not on the zoophile site that potentially endangers animals (not confirming 100% that bestiality is harmful in all cases, but I can't confirm 100% that it doesn't have deeper effects. It's a debate for a different day, but case-in-point, watching animals poop has less potential to be exploitative or harmful to the animal than straight-up bestiality).
And dog cum looks like human cum, so we should ban all videos with semen, as this is a zoophile forum: not a semen forum!
Not only is that a fallacy fallacy (meaning a fallacy doesn't intrinsically take away from certain arguments), but you didn't even get your fallacies right, for nowhere did I make the argument that scat is liked by more people, therefore it is right (example of a bandwagon fallacy).
Here is our reason. It's our website, we don't want it here, we talked about it and everyone voted no. Create your own website. We don't have to explain a god damn thing to you.
Everyone voted no, and you host the site? Those are more logical reasons. "We don't have to explain a god damn thing to you." Even sites Zoovileforum considers unethical have transparency logs. Also, that response is not PR-friendly for a site that boasts stricter moral standards.
