Why do you want to?Why am I unable to "like" a post?
I would like to be able to show other users that I like their content. I guess I would like to know why wouldn't you want too?Why do you want to?
That explains why all the women are overweight that I've seenWARNING: No posting media with the word "teen." This indicates someone under the age of 18 and will be removed without notice. Likewise, if someone appears to be younger than 18, the content will be removed. Please report anything you think should be reviewed.
BBW is for some completely mysterious reason popular nowadays.That explains why all the women are overweight that I've seen
That explains why men are seen as sexist, on here...That explains why all the women are overweight that I've seen
You already have this in the 5th post of the rules titled "helpful tips".EXIF Data:
Removing EXIF data.
This is data used in photos and videos to detail specifications, such as the camera used, GPS (If enabled/equipped), serial number of the device used, etc.
It's easy to remove EXIF data by using the right software.
EXIF Purge (Windows & Mac)
www.exifpurge.com
A simple, to-the-point EXIF remover.
For Linux users. I'm sure there's something for Linux users... But I'm not aware of any software. If anyone does. Let me know!
REMOVING EXIF DATA FOR VIDEOS. THE SIMPLE WAY. How to view, edit, and remove EXIF Data, including location on Windows
Alternatively, make sure location tagging is disabled on the device you're using.
- Go to the folder where your image is located.
- Right-click the image > click Properties.
- Click the Details tab.
- Click Remove Properties and Personal Information.
- Then you can click Create a copy with all possible properties removed for a copy of the photo with EXIF data stripped.
- Alternatively, you can edit metadata by clicking Remove the following properties from this file OK.
Why does the post you're replying to say no scat, but not the pinned? I wonder if they changed the rule.Is it possible to remove any kind of politic at this forum?!.
This is not the place i guess, it ruin the atmosfere here.
Thx..worknin progress ?
There is no scat. Ever. Period. That will not change. We are not a shit forum, we are a zoo forum.Why does the post you're replying to say no scat, but not the pinned? I wonder if they changed the rule.
Zoo includes scat, and keeping a closed mind to content with animals that is even less dangerous than the regular old bestiality stuff here is dumb. Your staff can't even explain your reasoning. Human on animal isn't my thing, but I'm not asking it to be banned. Why ban scat because it's not the admins' thing? Zoo means sexual attraction to animals, and that includes their feces and them dedicating. This reasoning makes no sense whatsoever. At least make sense if you're going to impose such an arbitrary restriction.There is no scat. Ever. Period. That will not change. We are not a shit forum, we are a zoo forum.
Even fewer places to mingle with zoos who like scat for no known logical reason whatsoever, no? And these arguments don't prove any point.I'm glad scat/incest/loli isn't allowed here. All these arguments about how they should be allowed because "they're more accepted/legal than zoo anyways!!!" are just proving the point we don't need it here. There's plenty of other places to access that content, there's not plenty of other places to mingle with other zoos so let's stick to that...
No, it most certainly does not. Normal human attraction does not include their waste.Zoo means sexual attraction to animals, and that includes their feces and them dedicating.
Normal human attraction does not include animals either. Get your bandwagon fallacy outta here.No, it most certainly does not. Normal human attraction does not include their waste.
Can you tell me where the fuck anywhere in the definition of zoo says scat..Zoo includes scat, and keeping a closed mind to content with animals that is even less dangerous than the regular old bestiality stuff here is dumb. Your staff can't even explain your reasoning. Human on animal isn't my thing, but I'm not asking it to be banned. Why ban scat because it's not the admins' thing? Zoo means sexual attraction to animals, and that includes their feces and them dedicating. This reasoning makes no sense whatsoever. At least make sense if you're going to impose such an arbitrary restriction.
Zoophilia means sexual attraction to animals. Sexual attraction to animals pooping is sexual attraction to animals, as I've sought content of animals pooping: not humans. Coprophiles aren't inherently zoophiles, and zoophiles aren't inherently coprophiles, so enjoyment can be separate. Like not all coprophiles are turned on by animals popping for a variety of reasons, one of them being because they're not zoophiles.Can you tell me where the fuck anywhere in the definition of zoo says scat..
Did you know most bestiality laws include "anal" in their laws? They don't have to say scat or feces. They say anything with the animal.Zoophilia means sexual attraction to animals. Sexual attraction to animals pooping is sexual attraction to animals, as I've sought content of animals pooping: not humans. Coprophiles aren't inherently zoophiles, and zoophiles aren't inherently coprophiles, so enjoyment can be separate. Like not all coprophiles are turned on by animals popping for a variety of reasons, one of them being because they're not zoophiles.
No scat isn't a reasonable rule. It's kink-shaming something totally harmless that any pet owner will have to deal with at one point or another, and AFAIK, jurisdictions that outlawed bestiality porn don't cover porn with scat contact. Likewise, no bestiality laws I know of cover contact with feces. Likewise, if bestiality harms animals psychologically (I'm not entirely sure), playing with their poop sure as hell doesn't. An act that reduces the risk of abuse to animals beyond anything that could legally be defined as bestiality ever could shouldn't be banned. Make a separate subforum if you must.
Also, I don't fw this attitude. This is like the people who say "animals can't consent because of pheromone signals". It's vague and not debate logic.
It's odd to compare pedophilia and incest with scat, as the first two can cause severe psychological (and possibly physical) trauma to unwilling victims, whereas the ladder only offers diseases given unsafe practices. I'd get banning humans eating or touching animal scat (without some kind of protection [like gloves]) videos from the forum, as it's dangerous, human on animal scat is morally dubious, and human-only scat would be off-topic (and IDK why we even have a human-only channel), but solo animals pooping without human interference? This is so safe that it's allowed on YouTube, but not on the zoophile site that potentially endangers animals (not confirming 100% that bestiality is harmful in all cases, but I can't confirm 100% that it doesn't have deeper effects. It's a debate for a different day, but case-in-point, watching animals poop has less potential to be exploitative or harmful to the animal than straight-up bestiality).Did you know most bestiality laws include "anal" in their laws? They don't have to say scat or feces. They say anything with the animal.
Of all the time I've been in the zoo scene, I haven't known the ones I've known to be into that.
If we're kink shaming, I guess we should allow incest, and pedo? I guess you consider zoo is the same as pedo?
And dog cum looks like human cum, so we should ban all videos with semen, as this is a zoophile forum: not a semen forum!Discussion...... I'm thinking we will allow. If there are pics, then the entire thread gets deleted. If it's animal pee in the pics, it will be a pass as well. Watersports encompasses everything related to human pee visually. Now, I could be over ruled, or if other mods vote that it needs to go then it's gone.
Did you seriously call it bandwagon fallacy after posting this:Normal human attraction does not include animals either. Get your bandwagon fallacy outta here.
Zoo includes scat, and keeping blah blah blah.
Not only is that a fallacy fallacy (meaning a fallacy doesn't intrinsically take away from certain arguments), but you didn't even get your fallacies right, for nowhere did I make the argument that scat is liked by more people, therefore it is right (example of a bandwagon fallacy).Did you seriously call it bandwagon fallacy after posting this:
Here is our reason. It's our website, we don't want it here, we talked about it and everyone voted no. Create your own website. We don't have to explain a god damn thing to you.Even fewer places to mingle with zoos who like scat for no known logical reason whatsoever, no? And these arguments don't prove any point.