Wondering which of these you think would be the closest human analogy (given it's so hard to google sex positions w/ non-human illustrations)
Not sure what you mean by perpendicular in that regards, but #3 of picture 1 would be doggy style with a laying down female dog, which is unusual but maybe some might want or accept it. Most female dogs would stand if you try something like this, as they can then pull their vulva up through arousing / muscle contractions, so you have an easier entry. But it is well possible from a physical analysis, just unusual.
#4 of picture 1 would resemble what I mean. Just that female dogs of medium size don't reach up to your head in that position, they end somewhere around your upper torso or shoulders if not stretched out.
both on sides is kind of like spooning except face to face instead of face to back?
which of these three do you think is best analogy ?
The second one, just that a dogs legs ain't like a humans legs and she will need to put one around your hip below your body, while you should
not lay on it with your weight. It's a bit tricky but well doable.
You can as well lay with her spooning, just penetration is almost impossible in that way, if you don't actually
turn into the spooning position with your belly on her lower back
after you penetrated her. Because if she closes her hind legs then it's almost not possible to find the right angle comfortably, as this puts the tendon / muscle mass of her legs on or over the area you need to reach in the right angle.
There might be some breeds where it works better, some where it works not at all. With Nordic dogs you should be happy about somewhat spread hind legs, else it is hard (outside of heat) to get intimate with her due to the hairs around and between the legs and the vulva which are the direct opposite of "smoothly gliding". Always better to move the hairs aside.
so start side/side and then roll on top later once trust is built and context ("fucking your pussy not biting your abdomen") is established?
I wouldn't say "turn in missionary" as it can lead to her feeling unwell / submissively under control basically. I would say, move just as much as she feels comfortable with and as such that her lower (below your hip) leg is free to move, so you don't need to keep your core / torso weight up by your own muscles to prevent laying on her (which hurts almost guaranteed, as you are 1,5 to 4 times her weight).
This confuses me because I would think with long legs they would reach the ground and bear her weight whereas with a short legged breed her feet would be hovering midair, torso entirely balanced on you, and hard to keep her balanced and not rolling off to the side.
A dog has quite long legs if stretched far, as the tarsals (basically the bones in the back of the foot) are movable like a lower leg and longer, as well as stretchable in an almost linear stance regarding to the tibia (front bone of the leg). A human won't do that often as it hurts to put weight on it on a linear position.
And: the female canine vulva entry seems like it's around 35 to 45° regarding the legs, if the dog stands upright. But the entry canal is further upwards, almost 80 to 90° compared to the legs: from behind. As such the outer area is quite flexible but still muscular and can be pulled up (or permanently higher due to heat and swollen genital putting it in a higher place = easier entry.
So.. if the female dog stands over you laying down, you are almost angled 80 to 90° to her vaginal canal. She would have to lower her hips as near as possible over your body, lay "over" your penis and then slide down on it. ?
Which is quite hard to do.
If you bring her to stand a bit further upwards and lower her back, then you lift your hips / lower torso, you can penetrate her if she's not too high or tall. But she might then even stretch her hind legs out, raising her back = you might slide out. If she would then pull her hind legs towards her body or stretch them far off behind her, you could move yourself and copulate actively, but like said: dogs don't usually lay "like a brick" stretched out, even in missionary they do this rarely. The legs mostly are stretched
upwards not behind / lower.
So if your girl (if you have one which is interested) likes the stance, it's possible, why not.. but most people actually copulating in that stance don't
lay but sit and were penetrating the dog from either missionary or doggy style, then holding her and turning around
with her, effectively letting her "sit" on your hips / lower torso. Then it's easier but I have yet to see a dog which just keeps the legs stretched behind her or pulled to the body without being hold by the active part.
well if they're humping' I think that would be a slight movement downard (at least it's pelvic tilting?) but I guess you mean "she won't squat to get you balls-deep inside her, just massage the tip/glans" since that would be fatiguing on her quadriceps muscles?
Yes, she won't squat and humping is not "slow", it's the same subconscious reaction / reflex chain that happens with male dogs. And as she moves her lower body almost 80-90° angled to the direction she would need for a length-wise axial penetration.. hard to do.
It works with
fingers quite well! Because those can and are to be curved, even in quick humping. But with an aroused erection uhh.. the girl would've to learn quite some form or yoga to firstly move
slow as to not ram your penis in either her clitoris fold (which is a dead end) or on/aside the bone structure as you're angled against the angle of usual penetration.
Still might work if the girl has the experience and wants this stance herself, actively working to make it a success, but it's quite unlikely I assume. If a female dog humps, she would pull the one she wants to hump as well with her front paws / legs on the torso and move in quick procession her back in the lower front, which makes it possible for finger stimulation but rarely for a penetration from the lower side. If you copulate with her in doggy style it works better if she starts to hump as she will just "pull out" a few centimeters each humping.
I guess with the worries about "am I forcing this?" the idea of "dog on top" would give a comfort of "she could just walk away if she didn't like it, doesn't feel threatened"
women who lie underneath male dogs an get fucked by them enjoy that comfort, it just seems a lot more obvious that there's consent and no coercion when the dog is on top, but it's not a natural thing for female dogs to be on top so I don't know how instinctively they'd be into it
which is I guess why your suggestion of "side to side" might be a decent compromise
I guess like w/ humans they might be open to experimenting with non-instinctive postures w/ trust if it feels good?
If you don't cling to her, she'll free herself if it is uncomfortable or not in her liking. Or she won't let you start the act at all. Or she will show signs of distress, of pacification like repeated licking of her lips, looking only quickly or not in your eyes (and then looking away again which means "I don't feel safe or comfortable in this situation / I don't want harm / I'm peaceful".
And: You can start with your fingers and experiment with her, she'll probably show you exactly what she likes and what not. My own actual female dog loves to lay in "missionary" stance spooning before me while I stimulate her by fingers, but won't like it if I am "on top" of her, means on the other side. Only sideways is acceptable.