• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

To those part of Zoocadia

Are you part of zoocadia?

  • Yes

    Votes: 22 31.9%

  • No

    Votes: 6 8.7%

  • Never knew it existed

    Votes: 41 59.4%
  • Total voters
    69
pes said:
I do not get that. Why are you there then if you do not like it?
Click to expand...
Irony.​
nekdoneco123 said:
masha never stated he doesn't like it
Click to expand...
I like that forum and it's really better quality than ZV. And so the joke is also true, an elite place. And that's what I love about it.
I don't mind if detractors call it an elite place. Because it really is an elite place and that's why I love it.

For years we were locked up with idiot fetishist, we deserve to have a separate forum.
 
Last edited:
Wolfspirit said:
I managed to stomach it. I feel bad for saying that because they had such good intentions with that and put so damn much energy, time and money into it. The art itself was nicely done, but it never should've been furry based first of all, that's just preaching to the zoofurry choir, if even that, and comic form is just not appropriate for that subject matter in my opinion.
Click to expand...
I have not noticed any backlash stemming from it though. But I am not on twitter or telegram where all the modern battles take place nowadays.
Did the comic cause any stir in the furry community or anywhere else at all? Or were the worries false?
 
MashaSobaka said:
I like that forum and it's really better quality than ZV. And so the joke is also true, an elite place
Click to expand...
i wouldn't say better quality, just different in some ways. whatever that's good or bad is not for me to gauge....
then again, two out of maybe four times i wrote something i felt needed to be said, it got (probably justifiably) deleted, so what do i know about quality. *shrugs*
 
nekdoneco123 said:
i wrote something i felt needed to be said, it got (probably justifiably) deleted, so what do i know about quality. *shrugs*
Click to expand...
That's why I don't write everything I honestly think.
People expect honesty, but when they get it, they are upset. I prefer not to write everything down. *huging*
 
MashaSobaka said:
That's why I don't write everything I honestly think.
People expect honesty, but when they get it, they are upset. I prefer not to write everything down. *huging*
Click to expand...
well, i for one value candor. probably doesn't mix well with belief that respect is not given but earned.
i don't really care if things get deleted. will likely happen again.
 
Gamerguy said:
Didn’t notice where the introduction section was. Accidentally introduced myself in a forum about random topics. People did not take kindly to it.
Click to expand...
Go back and read from where you left off in the "Lets talk" thread the smiley face and thumbs up to your post should have been a tip off that the people responding to you weren't being serious. But it was explicitly pointed out by one of the people who replied to you not more than 2 post on that they were just joking around. But I guess you were gone and never saw that part. Introductions are not even required on zoocadia. You hadn't done anything wrong and nobody was telling you off.
 
pes said:
I have not been there for over a year. I do not know what their rules are nowadays. I think it was not always 13+ and started as 18+.
I can not remember to be honest.
I will delete my account there though since I am not using it anyway.

From their rules:

What is ZooCommunity.org?
ZooCommunity is an open, friendly and safe SFW forum / community for Zoosexuals and allies.
It aims to be a well-moderated welcoming forum where everyone from ages 13 and up is welcome.
Our mission is to de-stigmatize Zoosexuality, provide a safe space for members to get help and advice from the community and talk about Zoosexuality as a sexual orientation, not simply a fetish.
Think of ZooCommunity.org as being similar to an LGBT support forum, but aimed at zoosexuals instead.

From my point of view. It is an echo chamber with false positive atmosphere, everyone overly too supportive and generally very little on there is interesting to me.
The claim that they are SFW is nonsense, since they have "soft" porn threads with yiff art containing genitals.

To make it completely obvious THIS IS A DIFFERENT SITE THAN WHAT THE THREAD IS ABOUT!
Click to expand...
I find it amusing that any of us think teenagers don't have access to sexually explicit material whether that be drawn, or real photos any time they want. Has anyone ever heard of a little place called e621? I can google dog balls and have thousands of real photos of genitals in under a second. is the soft porn section your talking about worse than that?

I'm old, but I knew I was a zoo by the time I was 13 for sure even if I didn't have a name for it back then. I just had no interest in humans they just did nothing for me. Back then I knew enough that it wasn't normal, but I'd be fucked if it is something I would discuss with my parent, teachers, doctor whoever, it was my secret. But back then there was no social media telling me everyday I was the scum of the earth and I should kill myself. So if this is correct
ZooCommunity.org as being similar to an LGBT support forum, but aimed at zoosexuals instead.
Click to expand...
then is the place any better or worse than LGBT support for people of a similar age who are dealing with that sort of bigotry as well?
 
HugDoggy said:
I find it amusing that any of us think teenagers don't have access to sexually explicit material whether that be drawn, or real photos any time they want. Has anyone ever heard of a little place called e621? I can google dog balls and have thousands of real photos of genitals in under a second. is the soft porn section your talking about worse than that?

I'm old, but I knew I was a zoo by the time I was 13 for sure even if I didn't have a name for it back then. I just had no interest in humans they just did nothing for me. Back then I knew enough that it wasn't normal, but I'd be fucked if it is something I would discuss with my parent, teachers, doctor whoever, it was my secret. But back then there was no social media telling me everyday I was the scum of the earth and I should kill myself. So if this is correct
Click to expand...
We obviously do know that porn is very easily accessible to anyone with a any sort of a computer from pretty much any age the moment you can use a web browser. I can tell you I had access from about the same age as you.

But the law does not see it as simply. And that is the reason why I left the site.

If they get into pedo trouble, I would rather not have an account there. More so when I am not using it anyway.
I myself have no desire to talk about sexual stuff with anyone who is under the age limit.
Since you can not be sure you are not doing that there and it can lead to trouble, staying off that site is better in my opinion.
Normal zoo sites are not as interesting for the law enforcement as those that involve minors even though both the things are illegal.
So I would rather take the lesser evil and stay on a 18+ zoo site where I at least have a much lesser chance of committing a pedo act by unknowingly talking to a minor. Here users are at least somewhat protected by the 18+ requirement and therefore implicit assumption that everyone here is adult.

You surely remember a couple of cases of zoos getting into trouble and having the pedo accusation piled on top whether it was true or maybe not. It is in almost every news article about some zoo being busted.

The law enforcement loves to have that excuse because regular zoo just is not that interesting but hunting pedos is.
It simply is not a good idea to give them this excuse just because that forum allows minors to register on it and any post you make there can be claimed to be read by a minor.

HugDoggy said:
is the soft porn section your talking about worse than that?
Click to expand...
That is not what I meant. Their soft porn section is in my opinion against their own rules since they say they do not have explicit porn material when they do actually have it.

HugDoggy said:
then is the place any better or worse than LGBT support for people of a similar age who are dealing with that sort of bigotry as well?
Click to expand...
I do not know. I have never been to a LGBT forum and I do not know how much those could get into trouble because of being accused of pedo related things.
Zoocommunity's intention might be similar to an LGBT support forum, but it puts their users in danger and I do not want to be caught in the crossfire.
 
Last edited:
There are many members under 18 on ZV (simple statistics), which staff cannot filter out. If the authorities crack down on pedo, this site will be one of them. It will not interest (especially to the US authorities) that ZV wrote 18 and ZC wrote 13 in the "rules"... They clean this place completely. It's just a false sense of security...

If someone doesn't like ZC, don't use it. Why is it that everyone is attacking the other side? ZV attack Telegram and ZC. Telegram attack is ZV. Everyone is throwing shit at each other all the time.

And Floofy is also a member of ZC. He wrote there a month ago. Too much drama... Its Furryville?
 
Last edited:
HugDoggy said:
Go back and read from where you left off in the "Lets talk" thread the smiley face and thumbs up to your post should have been a tip off that the people responding to you weren't being serious. But it was explicitly pointed out by one of the people who replied to you not more than 2 post on that they were just joking around. But I guess you were gone and never saw that part. Introductions are not even required on zoocadia. You hadn't done anything wrong and nobody was telling you off.
Click to expand...
I got complained that “ this is not a dating site” when I was introducing myself in the INTRODUCTION section idk how I’m in the wring
 
pes said:
US authorities do not concern me as I do not live in the US.
Click to expand...
I know. I like you.(y)

But I don't like it when someone unnecessarily makes a big drama out of things that are at most 50% true.

Since this is a derailment anyway, I think we should stick with the OP about the ZCA. I don't want to make the argument bigger.
 
mitch_ire said:
I got complained that “ this is not a dating site” when I was introducing myself in the INTRODUCTION section idk how I’m in the wring
Click to expand...
I have not read your intro, but I think if you say in your intro you a looking to meet someone that might be a reason you might get that, as personal adds are against the rules, but without having read your intro I couldn't say for sure.
 
mitch_ire said:
I got complained that “ this is not a dating site” when I was introducing myself in the INTRODUCTION section idk how I’m in the wring
Click to expand...
You didn't write anything about yourself, but you already mentioned in the very first line that you are waiting for private messages after 12 comments. This is not what ZCA is for.
 
HugDoggy said:
I have not read your intro, but I think if you say in your intro you a looking to meet someone that might be a reason you might get that, as personal adds are against the rules, but without having read your intro I couldn't say for sure.
Click to expand...
No I said I’m looking forward to meeting new people
 
MashaSobaka said:
There are many members under 18 on ZV (simple statistics), which staff cannot filter out. If the authorities crack down on pedo, this site will be one of them. It will not interest (especially to the US authorities) that ZV wrote 18 and ZC wrote 13 in the "rules"... They clean this place completely. It's just a false sense of security...

If someone doesn't like ZC, don't use it. Why is it that everyone is attacking the other side? ZV attack Telegram and ZC. Telegram attack is ZV. Everyone is throwing shit at each other all the time.

And Floofy is also a member of ZC. He wrote there a month ago. Too much drama... Its Furryville?
Click to expand...
Zoos, Furries, what ever, no matter what the group people always seem to find something to hate in others.
 
mitch_ire said:
No I said I’m looking forward to meeting new people
Click to expand...
I can tell you from the point of view of a mod that it is often difficult to exactly guess what someone means and sometimes posts get deleted even though they were meant in a different way.
Make a new post and just avoid making it look like a personal advertisement.
 
pes said:
I can tell you from the point of view of a mod that it is often difficult to exactly guess what someone means and sometimes posts get deleted even though they were meant in a different way.
Make a new post and just avoid making it look like a personal advertisement.
Click to expand...
Maybe ig
 
pes said:
I read your post and it seems to have been clarified in the subsequent discussion.
This is exactly as I said sometimes it is difficult to exactly guess the meaning of a post.
Click to expand...
I get ig is it very interactive there or
 
pes said:
I have not noticed any backlash stemming from it though. But I am not on twitter or telegram where all the modern battles take place nowadays.
Did the comic cause any stir in the furry community or anywhere else at all? Or were the worries false?
Click to expand...
I didn't mean to suggest there was backlash, only that it was by zoofurries but unfortunately ended up being only for zoofurries in how it was presented. With a little dose of cringe mixed in. They should've had some people from outside their bubble give their feedback before publishing it. Which is probably why it stayed mostly in the zoo and zoofurry spaces it was posted but not spread around much and expanding it's reach to it's intended target audiences. Because very few wanted to be associated with it. On top of the ZFA organization mess with Sapho the pedo co-founder and just their very controversial (within the zoo community) efforts toward the legalization of bestiality because of the debate over how that would affect the welfare and protection in reality, not theory, of nonhuman animals if it was
 
MashaSobaka said:
Not feeling. Its true.
Click to expand...
Maybe there's some of ZC members who feel that way, I don't know, but this as I said is about the nonhuman animals. That is what everything is and should be centered around. Their happiness (outside of fucking and cumming), proper treatment, education, without having to deal with being exposed at least twice a week on average to shitty zoo porn posts showing animals being disrespected and borderline abuse, and the occasional actual abuse, dick pics, the blatant specist animal-user mindset that plagues these types of places. All of this shit takes a toll on a real zoo, and the more empathic we are toward nonhuman animals, the harder it is! Its a very similar situation (and public reaction I'm noticing, oddly) with vegans. It may be the disgust, frustration, deep love for all nonhuman beings whether they're our own or not, and that empathic pain on our end that is being misconstrued by people who view others in a more egocentric manner, as holier than thou.
 
Cooper22z said:
edit: Someone did post that th age restriction to register is 13+... is that true because that.... that is pretty odd. IMO: Anything that's remotely sexual should be 18+ (NOT sure if this person is correct or not, going to do further research now)
Click to expand...
No, Zoocadia.net (ZCA) is strictly 18+, no exceptions. Anyone under the age of 18 gets banned immediately. Zoocadia is 100% an adult oriented forum.

The idea of the forum is pretty simple... it's pretty much your run of the mill adult oriented zoo forum focused more on zoophiles and the animal partners we love and hold dear. The premise is more similar to that of the now defunct ZoophilesForum (without the whole "trusted members" elitism aspect.) It's a space for zoos by zoos. To disuade kinksters and fetishizers, there's no personal ads allowed, no overly/solely fetishistic (leg-humper or waker) posts nor threads allowed, no human genitalia is allowed as avatars nor banners, porn will only be unlocked if you participate on the forum (post wise, not porn wise), non-zoo "human only" porn is not allowed to be posted, and no pictures of human faces as avatars is allowed.

Basically it's a forum that doesn't pander to kinksters, leg-humpers, and fetishists like this forum unfortunately does. It's a pretty free and open forum for zoos that don't want to be surrounded 10:1 by kinksters and bestiality fetishizers, but rather by fellow zoophiles. That's about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top