• Zooville Critical Notice, For all Users!
  • User Permission and Privilege Changes (PMs and Forum Layout): Sept. 20th, 2025: Please read the following announcement: CLICK HERE!
  • Update, October 4th, 2025: The ability to create NEW groups in the social groups area of the forum has been disabled. Click the hyperlink in the notification above for more information.

The Zeta Chronicles - A pro-active comic for the zoo community

Regarding page 8: I expect both visible participants as well as all living beings in the park to be leashed after reading that inscription. ?‍♂️
 
UR20Z said:
WTF is a "non-persona civil union"?
Click to expand...
It was a twist on the legal term of persona non grata. Since there would be some form of limited legal recognition of non-persona, or non person to person relationships in existence. Hence a new legal term would be required to explain it.

www.collinsdictionary.com

Persona non grata definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary

Persona non grata definition: If someone becomes or is declared persona non grata , they become unwelcome or... | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and examples
www.collinsdictionary.com www.collinsdictionary.com

I liked that little detail and @YanchaOkami why the main characters wouldnt be leashed. XD
 
Last edited:
ZTHorse said:
It was a twist on the legal term of persona non grata. Since there would be some form of limited legal recognition of non-persona, or non person to person relationships in existence. Hence a new legal term would be required to explain it.

www.collinsdictionary.com

Persona non grata definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary

Persona non grata definition: If someone becomes or is declared persona non grata , they become unwelcome or... | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and examples
www.collinsdictionary.com www.collinsdictionary.com

I liked that little detail and @YanchaOkami why the main characters wouldnt be leashed. XD
Click to expand...

Doesn't work.

"Persona non grata", from your own cite, means a person who is/has become unwelcome - mechanism irrelevant. Note that the person is still a person - he's just not wanted around.

Put another way, the PERSON'S welcome becomes nonexistent. he/she/it doesn't become a "non-person", he becomes an UNWELCOME person. There isn't even an indication that the person ceases to be a person - Only that he's become someone you don't want around.

Words mean things, despite your wishes otherwise. Sorry, but in the context you're trying to use it, "non-persona" is as meaningless as if you'd used "glasprindilax" or "sarglimalorp" instead.
 
It is interesting because the protagonists and most characters out there in the comic are no humans and most humans deem the term "person" only in relation of humans (or representatives of humans, as example with specific traits - nowadays not that regularly anymore, which is a good thing). It doesn't revolve about being welcome, the simple definition of "person" is enough to leave a funny twist in it.

Either those characters see them self as "persons" but resemble animals - then it's hard to argue why their animal partners are "less persons" and have to wear a leash.. Or they see them self as animals / fursonas / whatever, then it layers their own existence distanced to the usual "person" and it's interesting why they don't have to wear a leash them self.

At the end it's all coming to a simple conclusion: Those who can declare the rules will exclude or include as they wish, independently of a given biological aspect or specific resembling.
 
YanchaOkami said:
It is interesting because the protagonists and most characters out there in the comic are no humans and most humans deem the term "person" only in relation of humans (or representatives of humans, as example with specific traits - nowadays not that regularly anymore, which is a good thing). It doesn't revolve about being welcome, the simple definition of "person" is enough to leave a funny twist in it.

Either those characters see them self as "persons" but resemble animals - then it's hard to argue why their animal partners are "less persons" and have to wear a leash.. Or they see them self as animals / fursonas / whatever, then it layers their own existence distanced to the usual "person" and it's interesting why they don't have to wear a leash them self.

At the end it's all coming to a simple conclusion: Those who can declare the rules will exclude or include as they wish, independently of a given biological aspect or specific resembling.
Click to expand...
Shhhhhh....

Youre spoiling why its a furry comic.

Something @UR20Z isnt smart enough to see.
 
ZTHorse said:
Shhhhhh....

Youre spoiling why its a furry comic.
Click to expand...
Hmm, I don't get what a persona non grata would have to do with it, tho.

Except if it is linked to ignoring and breaking the given rule / law in a metaphorical sense: No matter what the protagonists or their animal partners would choose, if they don't leash one participant (aside the new non-person category, just plainly related to the rules given there and their animal-like occurrence), they would exclude this one from being welcome at the park and as such a persona or non-persona non grata, whatever it is at the end (animal, human, furry fursona..).

So as to fulfill it in the common sense of "leash your pets" it is necessary to declare a new form of "person" which basically includes fursonas and so on while excluding the "pets".

Or to define the "pet" aspect: one way would be - if it can't understand simple scientific or argumentative arguing based on abstract logic not linked to the thinking animal itself (direct classical conditioning shouldn't play a role here) - then it wouldn't resemble a person.

The "non-person" is one of multiple possibilities to declare it, but somewhat contrary to what many zoophiles would want: granting their animals a set of basic person (in this case human) rights which surpass animal rights. Be it for protection or for a certified relationship status like marriages.

Anyway, off to bed, four days of harshly timed events follow.
 
YanchaOkami said:
Hmm, I don't get what a persona non grata would have to do with it, tho.

Except if it is linked to ignoring and breaking the given rule / law in a metaphorical sense: No matter what the protagonists or their animal partners would choose, if they don't leash one participant (aside the new non-person category, just plainly related to the rules given there and their animal-like occurrence), they would exclude this one from being welcome at the park and as such a persona or non-persona non grata, whatever it is at the end (animal, human, furry fursona..).

So as to fulfill it in the common sense of "leash your pets" it is necessary to declare a new form of "person" which basically includes fursonas and so on while excluding the "pets".

Or to define the "pet" aspect: one way would be - if it can't understand simple scientific or argumentative arguing based on abstract logic not linked to the thinking animal itself (direct classical conditioning shouldn't play a role here) - then it wouldn't resemble a person.

The "non-person" is one of multiple possibilities to declare it, but somewhat contrary to what many zoophiles would want: granting their animals a set of basic person (in this case human) rights which surpass animal rights. Be it for protection or for a certified relationship status like marriages.

Anyway, off to bed, four days of harshly timed events follow.
Click to expand...
Exactly, and i think it was a brilliant point that mark wrote that little bit of world building into it.
 
After reading the first page of comments, yall can be harsh as hell. It's just a comic. They could have just taken the money and ran. The bar is pretty fucking low guys. Sure have some good expectations from the community but don't expect some kind of magical piece of art that's going to encompass every single person's experience on here. Especially for the future.

I haven't been here nearly as long as the obvi- super posters, but it seems like things get way too deep out of nowhere. OP just wanted to share a piece of art and I'm seeing people debating the existance of god like chill the fuck out boyos. hehe 0w0
 
l33t3r0p3n3r said:
After reading the first page of comments, yall can be harsh as hell. It's just a comic. They could have just taken the money and ran. The bar is pretty fucking low guys. Sure have some good expectations from the community but don't expect some kind of magical piece of art that's going to encompass every single person's experience on here. Especially for the future.

I haven't been here nearly as long as the obvi- super posters, but it seems like things get way too deep out of nowhere. OP just wanted to share a piece of art and I'm seeing people debating the existance of god like chill the fuck out boyos. hehe 0w0
Click to expand...
No, the OP didn't "just want to share a piece of art". This is a deliberate attempt at dragging the so-called "zoo community" out into the spotlight in an effort to "gain zoo rights". Despite the fact that there are those of us who have been around and around and around this block many times in the last 30 years, and seen the same result *EVERY SINGLE TIME* telling the damned fool that the only result possible is more hatred toward zoos, more, and more draconian, laws against animal sex, more outrage at the idea that "those filthy animal fuckers" are allowed to exist, more people jailed and their critters sexually mutilated and/or killed or left abandoned 'cause the arrested person was their only caretaker, and the list goes on.

This comic isn't "just a comic", or art being displayed - it's a calculated "let's try to sneak in the back door and convince the normies who, if left to go about their business without rubbing their faces in our existence, wouldn't even think about us at all, to get behind Zoo rights".

What it ACTUALLY is, is turning out to be a pathetic furry comic that's so cringeworthy I can't even express it.

As for your "chill the fuck out", no, dude, I for one won't "chill the fuck out". After watching shit along these lines happen for 30+ years in failed attempt after failed attempt after failed attempt to "get zoo rights", I can, without fear of being contradicted by anybody but the pollyannas who exist under the fallacious idea that "Everything works out for the best if you just keep plugging away at it", say that this is a STUPID action, that can accomplish NOTHING good, and will only serve to draw attention to our existence, which will in turn result in even more persecution of zoos and their critters. As such, I'll be damned if I'm gonna be doing any "chilling" - I'm gonna call it out for the absolute stupidity it is, and I'm going to keep doing so until the message gets pounded through. I've watched too many of these self-appointed "Zoo superheroes" who are going to "rescue us" (thanks, but I don't recall asking for rescue) from (uh... tell me again what you're rescuing me from?) do nothing but make the situation worse every time they've tried this crap over the past 30-odd years.

How do you avoid getting busted as an animal fucker? Simple: Keep your head down, your eyes and ears open, and let John Q. Public forget we exist, which is what he wants to do in the first place. Put this shit out there and rub his face in the fact we exist, and the only result that will (the only result that CAN) come of it is more and worse persecution (and/or prosecution) of zoos, and more and worse harm to their critters.
 
Reconscope said:
Isnt a sfw comic just a informative comic?
Click to expand...
So how does it read when your employer or coworkers find out you "have links to a pro bestiality comic book"?

What does it matter that the sex isn't depicted in the comic?

If it was a SFW pro-necrophilia comic...
"But they didn't show the corpse-fucking in the comic!"
 
FeralLovin' said:
It is.

And there is nothing to worry about since all of their ideas seem to have been schemed up after a day of finger painting and eating Elmores glue. This one won't end so hilariously like following an obvious pedo, but it will be mocked by anti-zoos, condemned by actual zoos, ignored by the people it's ment to win over, and eventually be forgotten when the minority of zoos supporting this kind of stuff hear about the next ding-dong that has a plan to win over the masses.
Click to expand...
Can someone point me at this pedo fiasco?

Was there someone on this site that people were following that came out as a pedo?

The zooville lore is deep and I am not caught up
 
Gtaw555 said:
Can someone point me at this pedo fiasco?

Was there someone on this site that people were following that came out as a pedo?

The zooville lore is deep and I am not caught up
Click to expand...
It's flaooating around here somewhere - Search "HypnotistSappho" (I think that's how it was spelled)

The very-short short form: The "leader" of the "Let's get zoo rights" movement that ZTHorse and this idiotic comic book are flogging came out as a "MAP" - "MAP" = "Minor attracted person" = "Kiddy-diddler by a more politically correct, friendlier name"
 
I will say this to this community of people. There really is not a dull fuckin moment in here! lol. A ton more people that I ever thought are quite intellectual and deep. On top of that every one of us has the ability to talk about what all the "normies" out there think it's perverse and that we are (zoos I mean, don't get started on that again, lol)evolutionary backsliding by being attracted to what only seems natural and normal to us. "Normal", which is only applicable based upon the individuals perception, therefore it is really a subjective issue.
 
Equitatus6 said:
I apologize to @ZTHorse and the artists of this comic for my earlier comments. I wish you all well in your future endeavors and hope you find success in whatever it is you are trying to accomplish.
Click to expand...
Everyone could use a bit more good will these days. Open hearts and love for those who need it the most
 
ZTHorse said:
It is in great honor, and humility, that I am able to present this for all of the zoo community.

It would not be possible to have done this alone, and in great thanks to everyone who has supported zooville and in general, the zoo community. With your funding, we seeked to use the funding to maintain the sites but also, to being to have tools in which, we could reach those outside our community with the realities and struggles we face.

In this journey, there is many many many talented zoos in the world, who with their talents, wished to produce this comic. A comic of which, can be handed to just about anyone and they could turn page by page, and perhaps, take walk in the shoes we face. Just maybe, we could do something to positive and up building for us but also those whom are mis-informed about us.

In great kindness, It is a honor to present Zeta Chronicles for free distribution across all mediums.

View attachment 234233

A resource has been created to be updated by google scholar and other search terms here . https://www.zoovilleforum.net/resources/zeta-chronicles.79/

This comic is likely to be 30-40 pages long and new pages will be released bi-weekly until completed.

Written by Libbypaw & @ZTHorse

Sketch & Line Art by Issac Coyote

Color by Championwhoops/Twitter

With kindest regards and love for all the zoos in the earth,
-The Zeta Chronicle Team
Click to expand...
Nice I have a lot of ideas about zoo stories, wish some day create a 3D movie styles ?
 
Yez said:
Agreed that the comic will likely bring no improvement on the public perception on zoos, but it's also probable that few normies will be exposed to it anyhow. I get and agree with your every concern, but I also don't think this comic will have the power to substantially chance anything, not even for the worse.
Click to expand...
Always worth a try. I mean it can't get any worse right? Not like there's anything to lose anyways.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top