Applying that logic to any other sexuality would be absolutely asinine.
Zoosexuality is different from other sexualities, so, who told you to amply zoosexual logic on non-zoosexual relationships? You are doing a red herring fallacy by applying zoosexual logic on non-zoosexual orientations.
I don't need to be a zoosexual to love dogs.
Well, yes, you could love dogs to a lesser degree, as you would love a friend or relative. But to love them to a higher degree, you need to be a zoosexual. Same way you don't need to be gay to love a dude as a friend or as a relative, but to truly love a dude as a husband, you need to be gay.
As a matter of fact, most people who love dogs aren't zoos.
Correct, they are just normal people who love them as friends, pets, relatives, they don't love them like a husband or wife, wih is how zoosexuals love animals.
I am a zooSEXUAL which means I am SEXUALLY attracted to dogs and my end goal is to have a SEXUAL relationship with one.
A zoosexual is sexually and
Emotionally/Romantically attracted to an animal, they see and love the animal as a husband/wife. You are clearly missing that romantic aspect of zoosexuality, else, you would have no problems in having a relationship with your dog without the sexual aspect. Your claims makes it quite clear that you are a bestialist (nothing wrong with that) which is a different group of humans (bestialist are not zoosexuals) who don't have a sexual orientation for animals. Bestialists only care about their own sexual satisfaction, this is why you see your dog as a failure as she is not into sex with humans.
If my dog isn't interested in anything SEXUAL, as great as she is, I don't consider ourselves compatible because, as a zooSEXUAL, I desire a SEXUAL relationship with her.
As a bestialist, you don't see yourself as compatible with her because she does not let you have sex with her. As you said, you goal is SEX, not a loving human+canine husband+wife relationship. So, could you stop using the incorrect term and address yourself as a bestialist? You, by your own words, have gave enough evidence that you are not a zoosexual.
Like I said before, any zoosexual would be compatible with a dog, even if the dogs is asexual. Because to zoosexuals the romantically part of the relationship is FIRST. It is the same as a husband and wife, who remain together and loving despite her wife having no usable vagina because of an aggressive cancer. He may not be able to fuck her, but he still wish to be with her because he loves her.
That's the entire point of this post.
Yea, we get it, you got a dog with the only goal of fucking her, but she is not into that and now you are calling it a curse that you are a bestialist.
Question: Do you feel significant distress or depression or significant impairment in your daily runine or you harm yourself or others because of your bestialist attraction? If you do, you literally can be diagnosed as having a zoophilic disorder. And it you feel that way, is best that you seem mental help counseling in real life to help you with that disorder.
How zooSEXUALITY is a curse.
Again, don't say "how zoosexuality is a curse" when you should be saying "how bestialism is a curse to me" ←Again, you don't fit the definition of a zoosexual, you are incorrect in calling zoosexuality a curse.
Also, since you seem incapable of loving humans (I will assume you are a bestialist exclusive) that is the curse that you have? That only animals arouse you? Well, easy answer is, get another, eventually you will get one that is into sex with humans and that should keep your libido happy for a few years. Rinse and repeat. It "sucks" that you end up as a bestialist exclusive, but self hating yourself won't make things better for you. Accepting that this is how you are and find a way to be happy, that is the best you can do.
How my life would likely be much better if the SEXUAL aspect wasn't there to begin with.
Won't you be asexual if you didn't lust for doggy sex? Some asexuals are miserable. So, you may as well be in the same position or worse if you where an asexual. Same if you where into humans, lots of humans end up suicide because of failed human+human relationships. In the end, you don't know if you would have been more happy. So why worry about that? Instead you should work to make the present YOU happy.
After all that weird soapboxing and accusing me of being a bestialist
You may want to read my reply again, nowhere I accused you of being a bestialist. I made generic statement of what a bestialist would be like. If you fit that definition, so be it. (And it seem you fit the definition.)
Also, there is nothing wrong with being a bestialist. And from your own words, you are a bestialist.
it really sounds like you're the bestialist here.
Sounds like you are pulling up a poisoning the well fallacy. Along with good old projection.
FYI: I have been in a loving relationship with 2 different dogs, as husband and a wife for a total of 14 yeas (in total) This is something a bestialist can't pull off as they don't fall inlove with animals. I know for a fact that I'm a zoosexual and not a bestialist as i fit the definition of zoosexuality, I would love my husband/wife even if they could not perform sexually.
If you're fine with a sexual relationship with an animal going only one way (and specifically, your way), you're the one using animals as sex toys.
I have no problem with bestialists using animals as sex toys, as long as it is consensual
and harmless, I don't care.
If a person loves the animal as a zoosexual would love an animal, him/her having a one way sexual encounter won't mean that the zoosexual sees the animal as a sex toy. We just never see them as sex toys.
If you want to be really anal about it, any human or animal being used for sex, could be seen as a sex toy by YOU. Point is, zoosexuals don't see them as sex toys, only bestialists see them or treat them as sex toys.
So I'm going to be clear with this again, for me, sexuality goes BOTH ways.
What does that suppose to mean?
Also, IMO, you give me the feeling that you are trying to be a zoosexual when most likely you aren't and this is causing you frustration. Best thing to do is to accept that you are not a zoosexual, be a bestialist and be happy about it. Also, you totally sound like you have some underliying mental health problem, you being a bestialist is not helping you either.