• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

The amount of people here who seem interested in animals just for sex, and nothing else, really annoy me

TheZetaMeta

TheZetaMeta

Tourist
Small gripe, I don’t know if anyone can relate to, but I really find how many people here who seem to be sexually interested in animals purely for sex, a bit concerning, and annoying.

Especially since there is so, so much more to zoo human/animal relationships then that.

I do wish there was more talk on the more romantic side of zoo relationships the sexual, because I swear most of the posts I see are just: “do woman REALLY like being mounted by a dog?” or: “is horse cock really that painful?” And stuff like that.

As said, I just wish there was more broader talk on everything else about zoo relationships.
 
This is what happens when porn enters the spaces I feel like.

Also, on some level, people are only going to be comfortable sharing so much about their own lives and so ultimately, it can be hard to drum up consistent engaging discussions within the community. There has always been a bit of and ebb and flow that I've felt.
 
It does appear it's more porn based. If you see the sections for Bestiality as a Fetish and the Zoosexuality category, the fetish side has a lot more than any other. It also ends up shrinking because I have to move a few threads that don't relate to that specific section.
Other Zoophile communities I'm on that are not porn based are always dead and never mentioned. But I'm sure if porn was on there, it would be the top of every porn hounds list.
 
Bestiality and fetishes make up the majority of these sites, which is why you see so many emotionless posts about just fucking.
There are far fewer people who live with the animal as a real couple, from emotion, heart, and soul, and make love as the culmination of this. Zoophilia would originally mean this, but today the word is used for everyone.
 
TheZetaMeta said:
Small gripe, I don’t know if anyone can relate to, but I really find how many people here who seem to be sexually interested in animals purely for sex, a bit concerning, and annoying.

Especially since there is so, so much more to zoo human/animal relationships then that.

I do wish there was more talk on the more romantic side of zoo relationships the sexual, because I swear most of the posts I see are just: “do woman REALLY like being mounted by a dog?” or: “is horse cock really that painful?” And stuff like that.

As said, I just wish there was more broader talk on everything else about zoo relationships.
Click to expand...
Yea I understand how your feel. For me personally, even tho I do enjoy the images and stuff I doubt i'd ever be able to like..do anything unless I have built up a really strong bond first, think id enjoy the closeness more than the other side of it. The end goal for me would be a really strong bond more then anything.
 
zaft_horse said:
Yea I understand how your feel. For me personally, even tho I do enjoy the images and stuff I doubt i'd ever be able to like..do anything unless I have built up a really strong bond first, think id enjoy the closeness more than the other side of it. The end goal for me would be a really strong bond more then anything.
Click to expand...
I think it's perfectly fine and healthy to enjoy a casual fling or encounter with an animal you aren't necessarily close with too, But all too frequently people who don't have that animal ownership experience veer too far into ideas that place hypothetical animals into the position of objects of satisfaction rather than four legged partners in mutual enjoyment. Animal sex is hot! Animals are hot! But man are some of the ideas people hold pretty uncomfortable, even if they don't realize or mean them to be.
 
TheZetaMeta said:
Small gripe, I don’t know if anyone can relate to, but I really find how many people here who seem to be sexually interested in animals purely for sex, a bit concerning, and annoying.

Especially since there is so, so much more to zoo human/animal relationships then that.

I do wish there was more talk on the more romantic side of zoo relationships the sexual, because I swear most of the posts I see are just: “do woman REALLY like being mounted by a dog?” or: “is horse cock really that painful?” And stuff like that.

As said, I just wish there was more broader talk on everything else about zoo relationships.
Click to expand...
soooooo what is the problem??...do you have fingers to type and enter conversation?.. contribute your input. lots of it, and the average of "purely for sex" and the " so much more" would find a balance ok...I am sure it would be interesting and followed too
 
Well, I am not into fetishes or so, my animals are my everything, my companions, I care and provide for them, I am not much sexually involved with them but if we do get to that point, it will be bonding often and also to show affection, love and passion and that they know I am there for them.
 
Like others have said it's difficult for people to share the more intimate side of this publicly. I haven't practiced in a long time but I love my animals to death, if I ever picked it back up again I wouldn't be able to ever have sex with an animal that I didn't treat as a partner and companion. There's no pleasure without love.

It's just easier to talk about the sex and enjoy the porn side of it for some folks.
 
There are quite some posts around zoo as a fetish that make me cringe, but such posts also remind me that when I first ventured into zoosexuality, it was all about sex for me too. The only thing that set me apart was that even then, I never considered zoo as a fetish or something exciting because it was taboo. But, back then I thought that my relationship with an animal lover would be incomplete without the sex. Over time though, I came to my senses and saw the whole spectrum of human-animal relations, where the sex - albeit it nice - is nothing but the optional cherry on top.

At times, I take these fetish posts here as an expression of people's excitement about having found a place where they finally can open up about their interests beyond our own species. Yet most of the times, I am trapped between the acknowledgement that without the porn, the forum would be a lot less active, and the cringing awareness of animals being deduced to props for the pleasure of the pornhounds whose total inconsideration of animal wellbeing makes me look bad.
 
I mean, I don't disagree with you but... that's kinda just how humans are--even with human-human relationships. I have a couple friends who are trying to date/meet people and I always hear about how much dating sucks because not a lot of people want a serious relationship. It's been that way for a while now, yeah?

TheZetaMeta said:
As said, I just wish there was more broader talk on everything else about zoo relationships.
Click to expand...
Highly agree on this point. I've posted a couple of threads because I want to know what the non-sexual side is like. I've mentioned in other posts I haven't really had a chance to even interact with a horse, but I really want to; I'm pretty curious to see what kind of bond I might form with one someday, or if I will at all.
 
I'm not crazy. Vaginal length from 6 to 14 centimeters (It stretches). The length of a horse's penis? Porn is ok, but it's not real life.
 
dogluver101 said:
Other Zoophile communities I'm on that are not porn based are always dead and never mentioned. But I'm sure if porn was on there, it would be the top of every porn hounds list.
Click to expand...
Which is telling us something important. This little hobby is nowhere near as widespread as we'd like to think it is. For the mundane world, its both marginal and abhorrent. Much of the so called "community" is only here for the porn, because that's what built the "community" in the first place. Humanity isnt going to change, except incrementally at the Speed of James( who is only a snail). Porn has its place. Art is a message sent by non-verbal means. Porn does that...whether we want to admit it or not. Disliking a fact doesn't make it any less a fact. All that does is lead to heartbreak.
 
Suzi said:
I'm not crazy. Vaginal length from 6 to 14 centimeters (It stretches). The length of a horse's penis? Porn is ok, but it's not real life.
Click to expand...
You only see what the producer
Wants you to see. Many of the visual arts' techniques revolve around that fact. Add in that the viewer's imagination plays an active role. It doesnt hold up to analysis, but porn's primary audience isnt up to analyzing it in any case.
 
I like porn. I like to read fantasies even very strange. But realistically, not all will be pleasant. Proportions and options are limited. Imagination is not limited
 
Great thread topic! I found this site a little over two years ago searching for porn. I felt similar in the fact that, while some companions show obvious signs, there are an abundance of videos where the animal looks more like a puppet getting railed. Is it really a 50/50? Or is the dog just trained to lay there while the camera is rolling... l worry how many animals get violated for beastiality clout
 
saddlebum66 said:
Which is telling us something important. This little hobby is nowhere near as widespread as we'd like to think it is. For the mundane world, its both marginal and abhorrent. Much of the so called "community" is only here for the porn, because that's what built the "community" in the first place. Humanity isnt going to change, except incrementally at the Speed of James( who is only a snail). Porn has its place. Art is a message sent by non-verbal means. Porn does that...whether we want to admit it or not. Disliking a fact doesn't make it any less a fact. All that does is lead to heartbreak.
Click to expand...
The real community is very small. In my opinion.
 
Those who are invested in nonhuman partners beyond the sex certainly are in the minority here, and easily shouted down by the sheer volume of people who get off at a woman being degraded by an animal.
 
AppleDash said:
Those who are invested in nonhuman partners beyond the sex certainly are in the minority here, and easily shouted down by the sheer volume of people who get off at a woman being degraded by an animal.
Click to expand...
It isnt necessarily degradation....that too is in the mind and eye of the beholder. However, when you notice the volume of the clowns who use the words "Bitches" or "Sluts" or "Cunts" in describing women, there's a strong streak of immaturity and misogyny among them. I always wonder why an amateur gal makes porn for these people...Insult ME and see how many favors I do you.
 
Of course it is more complicated than that. Yet I cannot escape the impression that a large segment of those who come here just for the porn appreciate the porn not so much because of the animal in it, but the woman being mounted. This is what you see especially in commercially-produced porn: it doesn't cater for zoos, but for non-zoo people who need something to spice up their lives.
 
AppleDash said:
Of course it is more complicated than that. Yet I cannot escape the impression that a large segment of those who come here just for the porn appreciate the porn not so much because of the animal in it, but the woman being mounted. This is what you see especially in commercially-produced porn: it doesn't cater for zoos, but for non-zoo people who need something to spice up their lives.
Click to expand...
I don't know the answer. I never planned to be a porn star. Porn movies don't impress me. Few are interesting. I watch pixiv drawings more often than porn movies. I like guys' fantasies. Always what is forbidden attracts people. Guys are watching women and hoping for an invitation :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
Like, don’t get me wrong, I don’t hate it, heck, I watch some myself, it just in my eyes feels a little jading when it feels like for some people, that is all they focus on.
dogluver101 said:
It does appear it's more porn based. If you see the sections for Bestiality as a Fetish and the Zoosexuality category, the fetish side has a lot more than any other. It also ends up shrinking because I have to move a few threads that don't relate to that specific section.
Other Zoophile communities I'm on that are not porn based are always dead and never mentioned. But I'm sure if porn was on there, it would be the top of every porn hounds list.
Click to expand...
 
Everyone is different. No forum is needed to do this. I was not looking for moral justification and explanation. Open-minded people experiment. For this you need your own dog, or a trusted partner with a dog and acceptance. Real opportunities, not forums.
Others come for fantasy or videos. I read. I don't analyze. Fantasies I like, too. I'm not a feminist. I come here because I have more time.
 
TheZetaMeta said:
Small gripe, I don’t know if anyone can relate to, but I really find how many people here who seem to be sexually interested in animals purely for sex, a bit concerning, and annoying.

Especially since there is so, so much more to zoo human/animal relationships then that.

I do wish there was more talk on the more romantic side of zoo relationships the sexual, because I swear most of the posts I see are just: “do woman REALLY like being mounted by a dog?” or: “is horse cock really that painful?” And stuff like that.

As said, I just wish there was more broader talk on everything else about zoo relationships.
Click to expand...
I feel like horses are very loving animals and dogs are truly our best friends that are able to love you more than most people could ever learn how too.
 
While there is no shortage of people here that treat dogs merely as walking dildos, I don't think the overrepresentation of questions about sex is alarming. This is skewed in part by the fact that you can discuss "the other things" openly elsewhere on the net, so naturally on ZV people gravitate towards talking about things they're not allowed to otherwise.

I too didn't join ZV with the intent of discussing how often people walk their dogs, though I later came to appreciate that even banal questions like this can yield somewhat different answers on ZV than within the general public. It would be interesting if ZV was a one-stop-shop forum for the zoo animal lover (if there were more vets here, then there could be some potential), but I can't blame it for not being one.
 
I'm new to zoo. love hearing from people and reading posts by people who have a relationship with their animal partner. Its obvious now but i learned that relationship is something that has to be developed and cultivated like any relationship. I'm not a big porn watcher so that factors in.

i just wanted to say I agree that it's annoying the focus on sex alone
 
there is some "other zoo stuff" talk from time to time, it just gets drown in the sea of ppl with the same "what does a dog cock taste like?" questions over and over unwilling to use the search function.

i also think kinksters (ppl interested in just sex not the animal or ppl who only want to watch others because some form of degradation/domination fetish) outnumber "us" like 1000 to 1... sometimes i do wish "our" orientation wasn't such a taboo, loads of ppl are here only because of it being a "taboo" thing to do.

don't let this echo chamber make you believe zoosexuals are in any way common.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top