Welcome to the The abusive porn cleanup project. A futile effort to teach people that animal are not sex toys.This is likely the worst canine video I have seen here so far. It literarly made me physically sick. What the fuck is wring with people? And how could anyone share that with feeling that "yeah, this is some good stuff"
I do appreciate your effort even more after this experience, this requires hella strong stomachWelcome to the The abusive porn cleanup project. A futile effort to teach people that animal are not sex toys.
Hey! I resemble that remark!!?It only attracts jaded pervs looking for the next thrill rather than zoos
Report it with explanation of what is wrong.
Removed now.
I cannot speak for all the mods on here, as I'd imagine that some mods check the "send notification" box while other mods might not. I usually do send a notification myself. But I typically keep it sort of vague. Such as, "Removed due to mishandling of a dog penis." or "Removed due to hobbled/restrained mare." and sometimes even, "Removed due to being highly questionable content." I typically do not go into a big long explanation about the exact reason why it's been removed. Not only that, but those notification boxes have a character limit. However, if I feel the need to hand out a warning infraction, then I'll sometime send the offending party a PM with a little more of a breakdown to the reason why their video was removed. If it's straight up rape or zoosadism, like not even remotely gray area content, I'll typically just ban the user with the ban reason being something like "posting animal rape content" or "posting zoosadism content."@FloofyNewfie I have a question.
When someone's thread is removed and the person gets an explanation of why it was removed, does it usually contain the reason and the explanation of what was wrong in the content? For example in the case above will the user be told that the video contained dildogging and why it was wrong or that dog cum does not in fact look like yogurt?
Thanks for the explanation. I would like to propose a new idea to the people who review and report porn. Since the thread is usually removed before the user is able to read the comment explaining in detail what was wrong with their content, there is limited or no lesson learned moment.I cannot speak for all the mods on here, as I'd imagine that some mods check the "send notification" box while other mods might not. I usually do send a notification myself. But I typically keep it sort of vague. Such as, "Removed due to mishandling of a dog penis." or "Removed due to hobbled/restrained mare." and sometimes even, "Removed due to being highly questionable content." I typically do not go into a big long explanation about the exact reason why it's been removed. Not only that, but those notification boxes have a character limit. However, if I feel the need to hand out a warning infraction, then I'll sometime send the offending party a PM with a little more of a breakdown to the reason why their video was removed. If it's straight up rape or zoosadism, like not even remotely gray area content, I'll typically just ban the user with the ban reason being something like "posting animal rape content" or "posting zoosadism content."
I do the same.I cannot speak for all the mods on here, as I'd imagine that some mods check the "send notification" box while other mods might not. I usually do send a notification myself. But I typically keep it sort of vague. Such as, "Removed due to mishandling of a dog penis." or "Removed due to hobbled/restrained mare." and sometimes even, "Removed due to being highly questionable content." I typically do not go into a big long explanation about the exact reason why it's been removed. Not only that, but those notification boxes have a character limit. However, if I feel the need to hand out a warning infraction, then I'll sometime send the offending party a PM with a little more of a breakdown to the reason why their video was removed. If it's straight up rape or zoosadism, like not even remotely gray area content, I'll typically just ban the user with the ban reason being something like "posting animal rape content" or "posting zoosadism content."
There is a character limit to what we can send as the notification.Thanks for the explanation. I would like to propose a new idea to the people who review and report porn. Since the thread is usually removed before the user is able to read the comment explaining in detail what was wrong with their content, there is limited or no lesson learned moment.
Therefore when you report a thread mention the user in here, make sure it is clear which of their threads we are talking about and copy your explanation to your comment here. This way the user will have a chance to read why their thread was reported and learn from their mistakes accompanied with a chance to discuss the problem in here and get further answers. This will encourage the people to actually think and consider the reasons rather than simply tossing the email into the trash and forgetting it.
I'll keep that in mind then.Good to see
Even something simple is better than nothing. With the character limit known short notifications should be clearly understood.... Um should be. Hmmm. There's going to be that someone..
For reference this comes from a vet guide to semen collection:This is an example of how to not jerk off a dog, in fact this gif comes from a video which has been removed several times already.
50 likes.
A few posts above that you can see an example of fake elemer's glue cum. And the whole thread contains several other gifs of women rubbing dog penises this way or riding them on their back which is also an uncomfortable position for dogs.
That does looks beyond fake. Why do they put such a thing if they know dog semen is clear colored.An example of fake elmer's glue cum: