enjoy...
URL
Even the first frame of the video shows the hind legs bound together. It is animal abuse. Let alone that the clip comes from fake cum commercial crap porn. Deleted.
enjoy...
URL
This is probably incredibly nit-picky but I'm like 80% sure >this< (LAST gif they posted) is from the video I'm replying to. You can catch a glimpse of the dog being held by the tail in the final couple of frames regardless.First video shows the dog being held up by the hind legs. Not sure if this warrants removal but I found it very concerning.
Some of these have been deleted. But it is a grey area.@pes, is cowgirl position acceptable on the forum? Saw something in the W/M section.
Different video and kind of gray area as well. But meh, deleted. One gif, not a big loss.This is probably incredibly nit-picky but I'm like 80% sure >this< (LAST gif they posted) is from the video I'm replying to. You can catch a glimpse of the dog being held by the tail in the final couple of frames regardless.
I go in the solo section frequently. Always on the lookout and report anything that needs to be. Sometimes you got asshats on there posting genitals of puppies ?An extra pair of eyes never hurts anywhere here
Not like this. Hit the report button on the post. Thanks.I see a dog chained in the Solo- Dogs- Nice girl's pussy and anal thread ? @pes
Who is she
and the op's only care was who the woman is? jesus...
Dog held up in place by front paws then laid back forcefully.
Forcefully put on his back several times while an incompetent piece of shit in the form of a woman sucks him off.
Smacks him across his face at 1:51 while holding his mostly limp penis.
3:09 holding him down by his entire head.
4:05 taking advantage of the penis bone forcefully of course.
Wow, just wow, I would not have though something could rival the worst piece of crap I have seen on here so far. This is just about doing it. This entire video is an example of raping and abusing an animal.
This is your final warning.
Next time you get a permanent ban.
Identifier:
View attachment 361139
They maybe don't , otherwise they knew it was wrong and won't post it, there are nasty people out there.Sometimes I wonder if people actually look at the videos before they post or reply or if people are really that horrible to condone such acts.
Not at all. These people do not care about animals at all. The only important part of the video is that there is a woman in the same frame with some sort of an animal doing something that is considered degrading and taboo.otherwise they knew it was wrong and won't post it
Yeah, I should have rephrased my comment, ? but the moral of the story is it's sickening how these people have no etiquette, dignity or passion towards animals.Not at all. These people do not care about animals at all. The only important part of the video is that there is a woman in the same frame with some sort of an animal doing something that is considered degrading and taboo.
As expected.This is leaked content from one of Alison's older horse films. The rules regarding commercial content on this forum could potentially get this thread removed. On top of that, Alison's content has a history of controversy on this site. The use of restraints are shown in previous trailers. I can confirm, they're used on a few occasions in this particular film as well. Although, none of that is shown in any of these clips.
Video1: Legs roped together. Both front and hind. Classic commercial crap. 1 warning point.videos
You mean cowgirl position? I have to check through every post in all the threads? More frequently on weekends can I do that.I want to guess F/M. Or at least it's the most frequent for fake-as-shit porn. Especially if there's a horse. And then with dogs they just bounce on their cock all day.
I am currently keeping an active eye on sections:@pes, which thread in the porn area are the highest culprits in animal abuse so I can look there, F/M, Solo, M/M ?
Got it, I will check through them againI am currently keeping an active eye on sections:
which together have just a handful of active threads so it is easy to check every couple days.
I am in the process of going through:
from the last thread to present currently somewhere in the middle.
If anyone wants to help with systematic reviews, pick some section except the the first list which does not need more eyes or go through the f/m dogs from the front for example.
Solo Animals
www.zoovilleforum.netTrans and Animals
www.zoovilleforum.netCurrently are not being reviewed by me.Males and Animals
www.zoovilleforum.net
The most abuse is in the most active sections. So Women with animals and very likely Men and animals where I suspect the most reportable stuff will be in the anal threads.
Probably not. I do not think the philias apply to non-human animals. You probably also can not apply the same kind of intention to them as you would to humans.Is this in violation of the rule against necrophilia?
thanks for taking a lookProbably not. I do not think the philias apply to non-human animals. You probably also can not apply the same kind of intention to them as you would to humans.
Eh, I see where you're coming from. But in this case I really don't mind removing such content. Also nobody's replied to the thread since 2019 and the poster hasn't been seen since 2020. I really don't think an animal fucking another dead animal is appropriate for a zoophilia site.Probably not. I do not think the philias apply to non-human animals. You probably also can not apply the same kind of intention to them as you would to humans.