a female dog can consent no matter if stray or not that wont change anything in that regard
its not right to use the dog for sexual stuff then dumb the dog back to the street
no its all the same when sex is consentual
Not again... males enjoy sex, females suffer it ?
One thing we can be sure of,
miserable life as street dog, suffering much only used from the ,,human,, for sex - not giving him shelter or such
and how will u be sure the male dog isnt exploited in any way?
Exactly that.
Dogs do not think like a western cultured human does and females can have as much sexual desire as males. Every dog is an individual, with varying urges in across their life.
Anyone in the lifestyle should be safety conscious. First is not knowing if the animal has a disease, parasites, or even rabies. People in the life should know the pet, that it is safe, gentle, friendly, vaxxed, de-wormed and de-parasites, etc. Plus, from the pet's perspective, that the person is friendly, safe, etc.
EU totally agree
Same with animals that aren’t yours without permission ie petsitting your friends or families animals or as a pet sitter job service like rover
I hate to ruin it for you, but several if the people who produce porn are some of the worst human beings on the planet. i know for a fact that of you have male on female dog porn, and gave been collecting for any time, you have porn made by sadists that kill dogs for pleasure in their spare time. (I dunno about other species stuff) Yes, it's that prevalent and some of the best stuff was made by the worst people. This concludes todays episode of Lonewolf Ruins Everything.
Its cruel because " Stray" implies no need for committment. If you teach a dog to seek sex from humans, and are not intending to be that dogs outlet for it, what the HELL do you think is going to happen to that dog if he or she approaches a non-zoo human and makes overtures? Suppose its an underager, or someone sees the dog make its approach to a human in an obvious way( canines are not known for subtlety, chum), and gets the wrong idea?
No, you are not ruining it.
If that works for you go right ahead, bud. If you're genuinely a Zoo of whatever stripe, you'll be back....I'll bet you'll find something to sub for that side of you....for a week or ten days.....good luck
I guess their point was more to get the priorities straight and try to get the animal off the streets first before getting into anything sexual and then letting them exist whereever they've been found. Makes sense, as this is the difference between genuinely caring about an animals well-being (as many zoos claim that zoos should be all about that) and only being sexually interested in animals (which is a reality that applies to most people in zoo spaces). So asking to rehoming them first before bedding them seems like a noble effort, which ultimately would quite probably not happen though.
That's what most non-zoos would prefer as well. In case of genuine abusers I'm totally on board with that. But not every interaction is abuse, sadly this can rarely correctly be determined by outsiders and especially not by watching porn, because in a video you get to see what people want you to see, but you may not get to see what's going on behind the curtains. So being cautious would make sense. A rule of thumb is: if something in the interaction seems to be off, the whole thing might not be as wholesome and fine as one might be led to believe. But as I said, it's really hard to determine with media, unless the watcher is really knowledgeable enough for interpreting an animals body language properly and is also actually willing and in the mood to do so and making this the determining factor if they like the video or not.
The answer isn't as black and white as it is portrayed here.
By your standards, EVERYONE is, bub. You need to get out more.....without the ghillie suit.
Agree
