support? i don't know if i would go that far... ambivalent or even accepting, maybe. but that's a start.
outspoken anti-zoos are usually very self-righteous and are usually also the type to go on performative tirades about child porn or racism or whatever, because in their mind being outspoken of it clears them of any suspicion.
case in point. i was thinking about this earlier today. isn't it kind of funny that these outspoken types are also the most likely to use our jargon? like, i rarely see people outside the community use "zoo" as shorthand for "zoophile." maybe it's for brevity, but it still begs of the question of how they know it in the first place... it's almost as if they've been lurking around our websites, reading dirty stories and looking at lewd pictures...
though i'm not sure why some of you guys are insisting that all - not just some - furries are secretly zoophiles, or on their way to becoming zoos. no doubt a lot of them are. especially the ones who look at straight-up bestiality art and call it "feral" — but a talking cartoon dog is a far cry from a real one who barks and walks on four legs. i can definitely say that the process for drawing one is completely different.
only thing that will do put a face to a movement people hate, so that angry zealots can shake their fists at him. meanwhile, the real zoos will be too scared to publicly support him for fear of outing themselves.
no, there are more subtle ways to shift the narrative without getting people fired or thrown in prison. some people may not be fully onboard with this zoo thing, but they might be willing to listen to reason. focus on them. and unless you want to scare them off, don't just blurt out that you fuck horses. present yourself as a disinterested third party, as to distance yourself from the angry zealots and make fence-sitters more receptive to your reasoning.
