You can delete posts you dont like
This is actually not what this would do if it is implemented. There will be no change to the software of the forum.
Only mods can delete posts and the decision whether a post stays or not is on mods.
There's no possible way that this could go wrong, that's sarcasm by the way.
So here are some points where this could go wrong which I pointed out in the dumpster fire also:
1. Let people of any gender post in any section regardless of the section's gender categorization and leave the post there until the OP reports it if they do not like it.
This is the equivalent of free for all rule. This breaks current categorization making the porn section effectively one monolithic porn category. (making search for the stuff you want to see difficult, categorization of information on a forum is a useful tool)
2. If the OP has been inactive for 12 months since their last post and can not be contacted, only then can a mod take control of the thread and move or remove the post/thread based on a report from an active member.
This was added after pointing out that threads where the OP does not exist anymore are common.
This requires manually checking who has been last online when if a report is received.
Then if the OP is not banned you have to send them a message and wait for an unspecified amount of time for a reply and then decide.
- 1. How long do you want to wait to be able to tell they are not contactable a week, a month?
- 2. The whole time the report has to stay dormant in the queue.
3. When it is decided that the OP is not available and a mod decides to therefore remove a post, then you can easily accuse the mod of transphobia since a regular user does not have any ability to check how, when and whether any mod tried to contact any user.
4. The same problem goes for abandoned threads where a user does not have any ability to check whether the thread was reported or not at all.
So in conclusion doing this change will lead to the trans minority of the forum complaining that threads/posts are re/moved anyway.
And this whole issue was started by a complaint about a removed post.
Which is exactly what this comment is pointing out.
No.
Too many variables to even consider, and if it was even possible. Still no. Mods would still remove it either way without the OP's consent if it violates the rules anyway.
I do not care for porn. But I do care whether a change in the forum is going to have a desired effect and in my opinion it will not.